Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2009, 09:23 AM
  #18181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by beer
Well..I am already getting calls from friends about Delta hiring. Here's a question. I have a friend who got a pink from NetJets. She will be F'd in January. Will she have to give up recall rights if hired at Delta? I personally told her, who cares, give em up!!
Now that's funny!!
newKnow is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 09:27 AM
  #18182  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
We merged. That's history. Looking forward, you still have not articulated a plan.
Here's a plan. Send me to negotiate:

Bucking Bar - Haneda Negotiations

(must read the captions)
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 09:41 AM
  #18183  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Razorback flyer
They've updated the "Delta Pilot basics" page to take out the contradictory information and any mention of how many/what type planes we have. Wow, that was faster than I expected.
I told you that there are people watching this forum that sit right outside the VP of flt ops door! (Very capable people at that)
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 09:42 AM
  #18184  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by beer
Well..I am already getting calls from friends about Delta hiring. Here's a question. I have a friend who got a pink from NetJets. She will be F'd in January. Will she have to give up recall rights if hired at Delta? I personally told her, who cares, give em up!!
Do I know her from EV? Doing training on the Hawker right now?
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 09:42 AM
  #18185  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot

You really pick and choose don't you.
Slowplay (and his evil twin the communications guru) is a master of this. Just pick out a few points out of context and focus the debate there. In other words, if you can't win the argument... change the argument!
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 09:43 AM
  #18186  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Slowplay (and his evil twin the communications guru) is a master of this. Just pick out a few points out of context and focus the debate there. In other words, if you can't win the argument... change the argument!
Too bad most can see that.

His skill is the fact that he picks out the crap that gets under your skin so you are compelled to respond! He is very good at what he does.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 09:48 AM
  #18187  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Now now, Slowplay and Sailing and Alpha all bring interesting points of view to the thread. They speak more authoritatively as to what the MEC is really thinking than most of the rest of us.

As to those in management, or ALPA, watching this board I doubt they even consider the opinions expressed here. They have much better information and they have a business to run. They might be like those of us who simply are Delta fans, have been Delta fans since they were kids and come here to see the "latest and greatest."

I'm not sure any of us have nearly enough facts to draw conclusions on a JAL joint venture. Based on past performance (and the obvious) our union will sell out junior members if they believe it benefits the more senior majority. This aligns our MEC with management to the extent that they can partner on outsourcing deals. "Relevance" might be a pseudonym for being willing to deal away our own jobs.

we've already "sold" so much RJ flying that we've flooded the market and management doesn't even need all the sub 76 seat scope relief they've got. The next market has to be something else, or somewhere else.

With "lines in the sand" who knows where they are drawn? From a pure economic point of view, the outsourcing argument works all the way up to whatever position the MEC Chair and those in power occupy. Once we decide that we are OK with selling each other out, the decision on where the line is drawn gets very fuzzy. While I understand the economic arguments for bargaining scope, as a union I have to see this as a moral absolute which can not be compromised. We must stop selling one member's job to benefit another member.

This all having been said, I have NO indication what so ever that our MEC is, or would, deal away another pilot's job. The political rhetoric seems to be more conservative on scope lately. But the candidates really did not adopt unity, or any other method to recover flying. ACL65 had the best plan, but he did not get elected, possibly because he was transparent & honest about scope.

Bottom line, we don't know where this is going and we really should not be critical when we are ignorant of the facts.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 11-18-2009 at 10:05 AM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 09:51 AM
  #18188  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Now now, Slowplay and Sailing and Alpha all bring interesting points of view to the thread. They speak more authoritatively as to what the MEC is really thinking than most of the rest of us.

As to those in management, or ALPA, watching this board I doubt they even consider the opinions expressed here. They have much better information and they have a business to run. They might be like those of us who simply are Delta fans, have been Delta fans since they were kids and come here to see the "latest and greatest."
Pandering does not suit you. ( You do have a point, they do share their point of view like we do fairly freely on here. Good or bad we know what they like and do not like)

They consider the opinions and observations as landmines to avoid. We give them a good heads up on what the dolts might be thinking.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 10:03 AM
  #18189  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay

We merged. That's history. Looking forward, you still have not articulated a plan. You've articulated a want. Big difference.
Guess what, that is what pilots do. They tel their union what they want, and the idea is that since the union works for the pilots, the union pilots (you and your boss) would go out and try to make that happen, not tell your fellow pilots why everything is not possible nor probable.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 10:11 AM
  #18190  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Pandering does not suit you.
Wasn't pandering - - you did not have a chance to read the whole post because this web site signed me out before I could get the thing posted. Besides, pandering would do me no good.

You might know a lot more about this JV and staffing than I do. JAL turned in a dismal quarter and my concern is whether we could keep them (and us) afloat long enough to turn that around.

As you mentioned, in C44 I think Mike Hansen has a good perspective on this and I'm glad we elected him. I also think our current Reps have a good viewpoint on this issue. They do a lot better on flying that they don't see as beneath them. For example, they fought mergers with RJ operators, but did not hesitate to understand that unity with NWA was something we needed.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices