Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2015, 12:30 PM
  #179171  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I have received two different communication in the last month stating that Dalpa will file a grievance on the violation. The company will come in just above 47% of the EASK verses the 48.5% required. The arbitrator will have to decide the value of those jobs lost.
The monetary value or the actual jobs? I'd prefer the actual jobs going forward. Back pay to the entire list (as it effects everything) wouldn't be a bad start though.
gloopy is offline  
Old 03-06-2015, 12:35 PM
  #179172  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
The monetary value or the actual jobs? I'd prefer the actual jobs going forward. Back pay to the entire list (as it effects everything) wouldn't be a bad start though.
Since the company often keeps above the contractual staffing in most categories I don't see how you could effectively enforce a penalty of carrying additional pilots. In the end however a arbitrator will have to decide both the value of the contractual shortfall and the remedy. We are talking about less then Two flights per day to Europe so it's not going to be a huge settlement.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-06-2015, 01:00 PM
  #179173  
meh
 
Roadkill's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by Karnak
Word for today: "Pretendicitis"

Sick, at least in DBMS.
Word for the day:
Pretendisentative:
someone elected to represent you, but pays no attention to their constituency, infers they are liars until proven innocent, works generally towards the worsening of their lot in life, does whatever they want despite strong opposition from their electorate, and tells their voters how stupid and un-knowledgeable they are.

not sure if this applies to any particular person... but I can definitely see using the word.
Roadkill is offline  
Old 03-06-2015, 01:05 PM
  #179174  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: Retired AF/A320 FO
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I have received two different communication in the last month stating that Dalpa will file a grievance on the violation. The company will come in just above 47% of the EASK verses the 48.5% required. The arbitrator will have to decide the value of those jobs lost.
It was discussed in detail at the local council meeting that I attended.
gr8vu is offline  
Old 03-06-2015, 01:08 PM
  #179175  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
Default

Originally Posted by Roadkill
Word for the day:
Pretendisentative:
someone elected to represent you, but pays no attention to their constituency, infers they are liars until proven innocent, works generally towards the worsening of their lot in life, does whatever they want despite strong opposition from their electorate, and tells their voters how stupid and un-knowledgeable they are.

not sure if this applies to any particular person... but I can definitely see using the word.
The Moak Group
EdGrimley is offline  
Old 03-06-2015, 01:25 PM
  #179176  
meh
 
Roadkill's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I was responding to the last line in his post.

So, only 5 Mar, not a heavy weekend or anything...

He seems to be wondering why crew Skeds would be having to cover a lot of flying. The answer seemed to me to be rather obvious.
Originally Posted by Doug Masters
Gotcha. I too got robo called. 3 of them within a 7 hour period. All woke me up. Would this be an interruption of my 8 hour "sleep opportunity" per FAR 117? Could i have legally accepted the 3rd call knowing I didn't have 8 hours rest?
Yeah, sailing is right on this one... I was woozy and disoriented after my 3rd wakeup in the middle of the night robocall, asking me to report in 3 hours or 4 hours (clearly violating crew-rest each time). I was irked and actually did kinda forget what was driving the IA calls, as I typed my message in the wee hours of the morning. But I can be forgiven as my wife was saying, "I have to wake up early, if that damn phone rings again you better be sitting up with your hand on it to answer in 1 ring!!!!"

And I can tell you that yes, being forced to listen to a robocall at 22:40, then at 23:58, then at 02:01, then at 06:31, then at 08:22, then at 09:31... YES, that absolutely violated my crew-rest, and I could in no way have been legal to fly ANYTHING they were asking me to fly, even if I COULD have commuted in (no flights avail to commute by t/o times). As I said, I actually WANTED to fly something.
Seriously, there have been multiple FAA interpretations of crew-rest and what breaks it, and at this point it's just crazy that they company has not programmed their phone system to remember who and when they called so as to not violate crew-rest.
Roadkill is offline  
Old 03-06-2015, 02:00 PM
  #179177  
Otto
 
MikeF16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Turkish Pile Driver
Posts: 1,806
Default

I have a trip that is a single leg of shuttle that blocks in early in the morning. If there was a trip in open time that begins the same day, would day 1 of the 2nd trip just add to the block time of that 1st trip, or would I get the 5:15 guarantee for the only leg of the 1st trip, then a minimum of another 5:15 for day 1 of the follow-on trip? IE, can I snag a 10:30 day?
MikeF16 is offline  
Old 03-06-2015, 02:02 PM
  #179178  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,591
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Since the company often keeps above the contractual staffing in most categories I don't see how you could effectively enforce a penalty of carrying additional pilots. In the end however a arbitrator will have to decide both the value of the contractual shortfall and the remedy. We are talking about less then Two flights per day to Europe so it's not going to be a huge settlement.
When we stopped flying to Cairo and Amman in NYC a few years back, those two daily flights x 2 FO's per flight changed the bidding dynamic as if I had slid back 40 numbers in category over night.

120 segments less per month...and I figure the top 40 FO's flew 3 of those per month. It made a huge difference for the A's and B's in that category. But I also get that system wide, it's not too big of a deal but we need to enforce the contract. From Junior wide body Captain on down, it has had an effect.
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 03-06-2015, 02:25 PM
  #179179  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Originally Posted by EdGrimley
Wow, I thought that was a joke, then I clicked on it. No wonder he'll never fly the line again...

Must be a lot of money flying around up there in DC.
Timbo is offline  
Old 03-06-2015, 02:44 PM
  #179180  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

Wonder how long until it hits chitchat....unbelievable!

Last edited by iceman49; 03-06-2015 at 03:24 PM.
iceman49 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices