Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2015, 07:16 PM
  #175951  
Otto
 
MikeF16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Turkish Pile Driver
Posts: 1,806
Default

Originally Posted by iFlyer
If your RAW score is the same (most likely), compare your days of availability - they are supposed to use a matching day before they move to the next day group (ie. 2-day trip to a 2-day guy, before they move to someone with, say 5 days still left on call). That might 'splain it.
That might be it. I think he had exactly 2 days of availability and got the 2 day while i had 4 (although they had to put me on rest for 30 hours of the 4 days).
MikeF16 is offline  
Old 01-15-2015, 07:21 PM
  #175952  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 106
Default

Originally Posted by Roadkill
Short answer: REDUCED MANNING!!!

Longer answer: Pilot Greed, guys desiring to score flying out of a base they are not willing to bid, results absolutely without question in reduced manning requirements.

Summary: Anyone who desires to be able to fly out of base swaps/pickups/slips is a greedy SOB who puts their wallet above the seniority list and manning levels of the pilot group. And should be beaten about the head and shoulders with a herring if not worse.
regarding the manning requirements, you could say the exact same thing about Green Slips.
just say'n ...
pb4ufly is offline  
Old 01-15-2015, 07:21 PM
  #175953  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eck4Life's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 289
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Damn PCS. Got a trip that blocks in at 2338. Trip ends at 0008 thus making it uncommutable. I put avoid trips with later than 2130 check out. Feel like I was screwed by a loophole.
To avert that situation, I put Avoid trips with check out <0201 in a separate line. This is after my normal commutable time constraints. If I'm going to work till 0200 (since that is the cutoff) on the "last day" I don't accept not being paid for it.

It sucks, but the best way to learn these things is to be burned by them. That's when you say, never again. I know I'll never forget...

Last edited by Eck4Life; 01-15-2015 at 07:32 PM.
Eck4Life is offline  
Old 01-15-2015, 07:28 PM
  #175954  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Originally Posted by pb4ufly
regarding the manning requirements, you could say the exact same thing about Green Slips.
just say'n ...
No, you can't.

Green Slips have a direct input to raise the manning formula.

More Green slips means they MUST add pilots to that base/category.

However, giving in-base flying away to out of base pilots means....they can keep doing it, GS tax free!

Last edited by Timbo; 01-15-2015 at 07:39 PM. Reason: Spiritual Clarity
Timbo is online now  
Old 01-15-2015, 07:35 PM
  #175955  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Originally Posted by MikeF16
Hmm, now that you bring it up I think you did mention this earlier. Thanks again, slow learner here. I did the math and came up with 23 lines plus a few slop since I assumed min credit per day and no vacation and was significantly closer than the bid package. Sorry to be right . I just missed getting a line, but looking at the last line in the category I might have done better anyway. I'll have more days off than him but since I'm commuting to reserve I'd definitely prefer flying to hanging out in the pad.
Well, until they get everyone trained and IOE'd and converted, it's all a crap shoot. So sit back and embrace the suck.

A year from now they...MIGHT...have it sorted out.

The good news (for you) is that you are at the front of the Suck train, as more junior newbs come in below you, they will be crying the same tears, and then you can tell them how much is sucked to be you:

'Back in the day, when men were men, and sheep were nervous'...
Timbo is online now  
Old 01-15-2015, 08:43 PM
  #175956  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Gold-Braided Lesser French Fort Commander
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by pb4ufly
regarding the manning requirements, you could say the exact same thing about Green Slips.
just say'n ...
True, to a degree. Greenslips as a Regular line-holder does directly make the pilot more productive (and that individual does get the direct pay benefit, and the commensurate workload toll) while directly reducing the number of pilots needed to fly that number of block hours.

A Greenslip while on Reserve, however, is much more complicated and has greatly reduced correlation to lower manning requirements: (as a refresher, and for noobs) A Reserve Greenslip is for premium flying on your xx days or ** days off, which pays straight pay, not double, added to your full reserve pay, AND gives you payback days for every xx or ** day that had even a portion of it violated, PLUS 10 more hours of recovery time beyond that. These payback days and recovery time are added to your next "on call" days that month, or if you have no more on call days left, fall off the end of the month and become payback days. If a portion of the recovery time also falls off the month, even just a couple of minutes, it gets counted as a full payback day, too, and will be reflected on the very bottom of your card under "payback days".

The recovery time is very important, as it means you no longer start on-call status at midnight - it might start your on-call day at 0534 or 0903, for example, and becomes very hard for schedulers to track and make plans for you as you literally fall off their radar screens on their midnight and early morning sweeps, and essentially become invisible.

The payback days are also very important. If they get placed on your next on-call days in the month, and its more than a few days out (3? I think?), you can move them around just like your other xx and ** days, which gives you more flexibility to get the days off you actually need. Alternately, payback days that fall off the end of the month are truly an Ace up your sleeve, ready to be deployed during any Reserve or Regular month for the rest of that calendar year (whereupon they drop out of your payback bank and become supplemental vacation days, but only paying 3:15 vacay pay). Use PCS, Payback days menu to drop a number of reserve days, or regular trips (provided there is coverage), and get pay (and credit, I believe) for either the full pro-rata reserve day, or the value of the trip.

As you can see, it is indeed possible to take 1:21 of recovery time that flows into the next day and falls off the end of the month, and becomes a full payback day, then use it to get paid to drop an 8:06 AUS turn. Which scheduling now has to cover, (or someone gladly picks up) thereby increasing manning requirements.

So the Reserve Greenslip is actually scheduling's version of buying you for today with a high-interest, variable-rate credit card. For which you control the rate. And when they have to pay you back.
iFlyer is offline  
Old 01-15-2015, 08:48 PM
  #175957  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: C560XL/XLS/XLS+
Posts: 1,278
Default

Originally Posted by Roadkill
Short answer: REDUCED MANNING!!!

Longer answer: Pilot Greed, guys desiring to score flying out of a base they are not willing to bid, results absolutely without question in reduced manning requirements.

Summary: Anyone who desires to be able to fly out of base swaps/pickups/slips is a greedy SOB who puts their wallet above the seniority list and manning levels of the pilot group. And should be beaten about the head and shoulders with a herring if not worse.
I do OOB white slips. Come get me.
dalad is offline  
Old 01-15-2015, 09:01 PM
  #175958  
meh
 
Roadkill's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by FIIGMO
That is plain out of line...


Much more to life and choices and circumstance to judge others so harshly without knowing any facts. I am Not willing to allow out of base pickups mind you but, at some times using the laws of the system to benefit is a perk of collective bargaining. When we all agree on a secret handshake about protecting jobs with work action, and some barking sphincter takes the monetary advantage you then may have a point. For now, you are out of line...

Not out of line at all.
FIRST, you apparently took the "beaten about the head and shoulders with a herring" seriously, which should be an indicator to the astute reader of some tongue-in-cheek writing, not to be taken wholly seriously.

Ok, well so let's say you took it seriously.
How long did we have to work to get the trip parking stopped? This is fruit off the same tree. This is not something we can currently do, this is a NEW WORK RULE LOSS that is being discussed! Therefore NO ONE has any "life and choices and circumstance" that are affected by this hypothetical! And your straw man of "judge others so harshly without knowing any facts"-- JUDGE WHO?? NO ONE can do this, therefore I'm not judging ANY ACTUAL PERSON harshly. I'm judging a job-reducing short-sighted potential work rule harshly--yes. If YOU felt insulted, well I've got nothing against the Fiigmo, you shouldn't.

1. I didn't insult anyone. Someone asked for pro-con, did NOT say they supported this. I didn't call them or you anything; I posited a hypothetical pilot with a particular opinion that no one (that I recall) has espoused. An opinion that I'm 100% against, and that I pre-emptively attacked before anyone particularly supported it. Guys should know and be told in no uncertain terms when a work rule
2. At some point the trip goes up for GS coverage and someone IN BASE gets the chance to make more $$. No matter WHERE or HOW it is done, allowing ANOTHER group of pilots to offer to fly that trip, which the company currently does not have the ability to access or with reduced restrictions (!), will reduce the pressure on the company in that base for coverage and will reduce the number of trips put out for GS. The END EFFECT is to reduce the number of pilots needed to fly the entire Delta schedule. All of that is negative.

If you want to fly trips out of a base, bid the base. Or bid OOB White Slips like Dalad does above, which are already in the coverage matrix.

When someone at that base doesn't want to fly a trip and puts it on the swap board--it's THOSE GUY's TRIP, Guys at THAT BASE. To take or to let fall into the coverage ladder, and maybe go to GS IN THAT BASE. I can just imagine the bidding cabals that would emerge if we were foolish enough to ever let this camel get it's nose in the tent...
Roadkill is offline  
Old 01-15-2015, 10:40 PM
  #175959  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TeddyKGB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: 7er
Posts: 1,673
Default

Originally Posted by Roadkill
Not out of line at all.
FIRST, you apparently took the "beaten about the head and shoulders with a herring" seriously, which should be an indicator to the astute reader of some tongue-in-cheek writing, not to be taken wholly seriously.

Ok, well so let's say you took it seriously.
How long did we have to work to get the trip parking stopped? This is fruit off the same tree. This is not something we can currently do, this is a NEW WORK RULE LOSS that is being discussed! Therefore NO ONE has any "life and choices and circumstance" that are affected by this hypothetical! And your straw man of "judge others so harshly without knowing any facts"-- JUDGE WHO?? NO ONE can do this, therefore I'm not judging ANY ACTUAL PERSON harshly. I'm judging a job-reducing short-sighted potential work rule harshly--yes. If YOU felt insulted, well I've got nothing against the Fiigmo, you shouldn't.

1. I didn't insult anyone. Someone asked for pro-con, did NOT say they supported this. I didn't call them or you anything; I posited a hypothetical pilot with a particular opinion that no one (that I recall) has espoused. An opinion that I'm 100% against, and that I pre-emptively attacked before anyone particularly supported it. Guys should know and be told in no uncertain terms when a work rule
2. At some point the trip goes up for GS coverage and someone IN BASE gets the chance to make more $$. No matter WHERE or HOW it is done, allowing ANOTHER group of pilots to offer to fly that trip, which the company currently does not have the ability to access or with reduced restrictions (!), will reduce the pressure on the company in that base for coverage and will reduce the number of trips put out for GS. The END EFFECT is to reduce the number of pilots needed to fly the entire Delta schedule. All of that is negative.

If you want to fly trips out of a base, bid the base. Or bid OOB White Slips like Dalad does above, which are already in the coverage matrix.

When someone at that base doesn't want to fly a trip and puts it on the swap board--it's THOSE GUY's TRIP, Guys at THAT BASE. To take or to let fall into the coverage ladder, and maybe go to GS IN THAT BASE. I can just imagine the bidding cabals that would emerge if we were foolish enough to ever let this camel get it's nose in the tent...
Not arguing with you but still trying to determine the pros/cons of out of base swap board pick ups. If a swap board trip doesn't get picked up it IS NOT going to fall into an in base GS as you suggest. Rather, the pilot who is trying to dump the trip is going to be stuck flying the trip. I don't get your logic in how a swap board trip not picked up could potentially results in a GS? And yes, it's "THOSE GUY's TRIP" as you suggest. Let it sit on the swap board until the last day but when it comes down to the final hours and no one in base has picked up the swap board trip then what is the harm in having an out of base pilot pick it up. Out of base pilot scored a trip he wants and the guy wanting to drop his trip was able to drop his trip. Win/Win? If an out of base guy isn't allowed to pick up the trip you aren't preventing an in base GS.

With such statements as "Anyone who desires to be able to fly out of base swaps/pickups/slips is a greedy SOB who puts their wallet above the seniority list and manning levels of the pilot group. And should be beaten about the head and shoulders with a herring if not worse." You lose you credibility very quickly.

Last edited by TeddyKGB; 01-15-2015 at 10:52 PM. Reason: u
TeddyKGB is offline  
Old 01-16-2015, 12:15 AM
  #175960  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by DelDah Capt
You have to fill it out again. Go to the Fidelity 401k site (the Deltanet link sends you to the same page) and select 'contributions' and you will find that the Profit Sharing contribution is currently preset at zero. You can populate it with whatever percentage you want.
Thanks for the info.
scambo1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices