Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Can you please post the document that shows 25 wide body purchases that are coming JUST to fly the Pacific?
Carl
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,740
What's curious is that Bucking Bar used to be one of the most thoughtful analysts here. He used to routinely and very correctly criticize DALPA/ALPA when warranted, and correctly praise them when warranted. Now he's every bit as shameless of an ALPA propagandist as Shiznit or sailingfun. How does that happen? What is the DALPA conversion process for guys like Bar?
To me, that's the more interesting question.
Carl
To me, that's the more interesting question.
Carl
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
What's curious is that Bucking Bar used to be one of the most thoughtful analysts here. He used to routinely and very correctly criticize DALPA/ALPA when warranted, and correctly praise them when warranted. Now he's every bit as shameless of an ALPA propagandist as Shiznit or sailingfun. How does that happen? What is the DALPA conversion process for guys like Bar?
To me, that's the more interesting question.
To me, that's the more interesting question.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
[QUOTE=Carl Spackler;1776239]I think Orvil is talking about the plan going forward sailingfun...not the last 15 years.
Can you please post the document that shows 25 wide body purchases that are coming JUST to fly the Pacific?
At the flight ops briefing the company stated the 777 was removed from consideration because they were focusing on a going point to point in the Pacific not Hub to hub. In fact I believe you posted comments some time back stating that. They also stated the 330 NEO did not have the range for the planned Pacific operations and they required the A350 or 787 in the Pacific. They stated the 330 NEO would be primarily a Atlantic and SA aircraft. Inchon is well within the 330 NEO's range.
Because our "union" has shown them over and over again that they have no intention to resist management if management decides not to follow our contract. The real question is, why wouldn't management sign a TA? We're forced to follow it, they're not. No downside.
We have multiple sections dealing with scope in the contract. The company is in compliance with every single section. On 1 APR the company will likely be out of compliance with one section. The non compliance looks like it will be equal to about 1 medium haul Europe flight on a 767-400 per day over the measurement period.
I fully expect the union to either file a grievance or reach a settlement with the company on that issue.
Can you please post the document that shows 25 wide body purchases that are coming JUST to fly the Pacific?
At the flight ops briefing the company stated the 777 was removed from consideration because they were focusing on a going point to point in the Pacific not Hub to hub. In fact I believe you posted comments some time back stating that. They also stated the 330 NEO did not have the range for the planned Pacific operations and they required the A350 or 787 in the Pacific. They stated the 330 NEO would be primarily a Atlantic and SA aircraft. Inchon is well within the 330 NEO's range.
Because our "union" has shown them over and over again that they have no intention to resist management if management decides not to follow our contract. The real question is, why wouldn't management sign a TA? We're forced to follow it, they're not. No downside.
We have multiple sections dealing with scope in the contract. The company is in compliance with every single section. On 1 APR the company will likely be out of compliance with one section. The non compliance looks like it will be equal to about 1 medium haul Europe flight on a 767-400 per day over the measurement period.
I fully expect the union to either file a grievance or reach a settlement with the company on that issue.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post