Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2014, 03:03 AM
  #171811  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 327
Default 22D2 staffing report

I am kind of confused by this. Is this minimum pilot count by category/seat that is required contractually? Is it safe to assume there will be slightly more in each category than the minimum required?

Thanks
duece12345 is offline  
Old 11-07-2014, 05:10 AM
  #171812  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
In C2012 the MEC never authorized or discussed reducing profit sharing. O'Malley agreed to it without MEC knowledge and it was jammed down their throats. Same plan this time.
As you were not on the MEC at the time, you have no way to know whether the first statement is true. And you have no way of knowing whether your last statement is true, either.
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 11-07-2014, 05:27 AM
  #171813  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Give Mike Hanson a call and report back to us on whether or not you think we will reduce profit sharing. Or you can continue to live in dream world.

I suppose you were one of the many who said I was full of crap on C2012 when I said we were going to allow many more 76 seat RJs.

I hope more than anything to be wrong. Remember, the reps are flying the line. Just like last time, it is the admin insiders who make the concessions.

In C2012 the MEC never authorized or discussed reducing profit sharing. O'Malley agreed to it without MEC knowledge and it was jammed down their throats. Same plan this time.
There are less RJ aircraft, less RJ seats being flown, less RJ pilots, less Delta passengers being deceived about who is flying their aircraft. Those are facts of C2012. An RJ seat is an RJ seat no matter if it is a 50 or 76 seater. The economics and staffing will further reduce the numbers. Just sayin.
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 11-07-2014, 06:05 AM
  #171814  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by FIIGMO
There are less RJ aircraft, less RJ seats being flown, less RJ pilots, less Delta passengers being deceived about who is flying their aircraft. Those are facts of C2012. An RJ seat is an RJ seat no matter if it is a 50 or 76 seater. The economics and staffing will further reduce the numbers. Just sayin.
His point is correct in that c2012 allowed more 76 seaters and while their staffing woes are good for us the dropping fuel prices make those large 76 seaters more economical.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 11-07-2014, 06:13 AM
  #171815  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

And fwiw, what is jet A prices today? $2.42/gal? It's a four year low and far below the $3.20+ that it was when C2012 was being negotiated and Delta was focusing on getting more 76 seaters.

DCI has not been vanquished, they're still here. Hopefully they find more chicken bones to choke on and the 717s that were coming anyways finish them off. Then maybe Delta takes at least the small jet flying back to the big house.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 11-07-2014, 06:23 AM
  #171816  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

The trend is our friend in this case. Short sighted to just focus on current fuel prices because we know they will go back up and put us back in a position bargain with a new set of economics. Less RJs are good! Even less is far better. Hopefully C2015 will be even less without a need to give anything up. Not likely. Giving up the RJ will cost us. How much do we want to give up is the question to get it back?
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 11-07-2014, 06:25 AM
  #171817  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
And fwiw, what is jet A prices today? $2.42/gal? It's a four year low and far below the $3.20+ that it was when C2012 was being negotiated and Delta was focusing on getting more 76 seaters.

DCI has not been vanquished, they're still here. Hopefully they find more chicken bones to choke on and the 717s that were coming anyways finish them off. Then maybe Delta takes at least the small jet flying back to the big house.
Remember, big things are coming soon, and we'll never see those 3% bumps!
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 11-07-2014, 06:27 AM
  #171818  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Starcheck102's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: ATL 7ER A
Posts: 308
Default

You're being used, gzsg.
Starcheck102 is offline  
Old 11-07-2014, 06:39 AM
  #171819  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Starcheck102
You're being used, gzsg.
That's the truth. There is no one around that throws more crap out there just to throw crap out there. He's the National Enquirer of the various DL forums.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 11-07-2014, 06:45 AM
  #171820  
Line Holder
 
LowPhlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: Capt
Posts: 38
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
As you were not on the MEC at the time, you have no way to know whether the first statement is true. And you have no way of knowing whether your last statement is true, either.
gzsg is "mostly" correct in his statement. The profit sharing reduction was floated as a "trial balloon" less than 48 hours before the T/A was announced and handed to the MEC. This means there was some discussion (which was mostly negative toward the idea of trading profit sharing for increased raises). But, there was no re-direction from the MEC to the negotiators or MEC Chairman.

Of course, the MEC was then handed the T/A with the profit sharing reduction and our MEC Chairman was quoted as stating: “The T/A should not be judged compared to the pilots aspirations as reflected in the contract survey…there is no context to their wishes”

The same background players are still prominent in the MEC Administration.

LP
LowPhlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices