Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2009, 08:04 AM
  #16871  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by 944Turbo
If management wants the E-195 at compass, fine. All they have to do is give the compass guys numbers 124XX and below, desolve the certificate, no more 76 seat jets at any other airline, and open them up to bid.

How easy was that?
Not so easy, apparently.

The Compass guys were a lot closer to a number and we divested them because we did not want to administer their contract (among other reasons).

No one gets that we can have one list that spans multiple contracts and carriers. I think that is an answer to our scope morass, but acknowledge we'd move whipsaw into our own list by creating a type specific sort of B scale.

But I agree with my Porshephile friend, if the Company wants them to fly a jet not permitted under our scope, they need to hire a Delta pilot to perform that flying.

Has anyone actually heard a Rep, or ALPA staffer, say anything about even considering giving up a seat, a jet, or a job? Any credible reports out there, or is this conjecture?
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 10:07 AM
  #16872  
Gets Weekends Off
 
brakechatter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 404
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Lee Moak has a history of selling scope concessions to the pilot group.
He won't necessarily have to "offer" anything. Moak's tactic is to use fear.
He'll come up with some scenario that includes terrible consequences if we don't allow the company to outsource more flying.
60% will be scared enough to vote yes. Same as it ever was.

Hey folks,

We have 1 week left of balloting in council 44. I have heard nothing of any type of deal being generated for 100 relief--permanent or temporary. This is exactly the kind of thing which demonstrates why these elections are so important. Any kind of deal which allows 100 seat outsourcing, 100 seat temporary outsourcing pending an order, 100 seat jets being flown by anyone other than a Delta pilot at any time for any length is unacceptable. It allows possession of 100 seat aircraft by other than Delta pilots, and possession is 9/10ths of the law. I could describe a bunch of scenarios where such a deal could lead to permanent change no matter how crafty the language in our favor.

Again, I have not heard of any kind of deal such as this being floated anywhere, by anybody. I will be in CQ on thursday and friday to poke around and see what I can dig up. I have seen a lot of support for me on this board, and I truly appreciate it. At the same time, it may not be enough. Get the word out to vote. Convince your friends to vote. It's important.

CS
brakechatter is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 10:31 AM
  #16873  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Lee Moak has a history of selling scope concessions to the pilot group.
He won't necessarily have to "offer" anything. Moak's tactic is to use fear.
He'll come up with some scenario that includes terrible consequences if we don't allow the company to outsource more flying.
60% will be scared enough to vote yes. Same as it ever was.
Other than the bankruptcy deal, could you elaborate. If you can't understand the significant risks to labor in bankruptcy, then you have been living in a cave for the last 7 years.

Since bankruptcy, there have been a series of agreements, primarily in regards to the Joint Venture that have strengthened our scope. We now have the tightest Joint Venture protections in the industry. If there is a "history" of selling scope concessions, you should at least be able to name one.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 10:36 AM
  #16874  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by brakechatter
Hey folks,

We have 1 week left of balloting in council 44. I have heard nothing of any type of deal being generated for 100 relief--permanent or temporary. This is exactly the kind of thing which demonstrates why these elections are so important. Any kind of deal which allows 100 seat outsourcing, 100 seat temporary outsourcing pending an order, 100 seat jets being flown by anyone other than a Delta pilot at any time for any length is unacceptable. It allows possession of 100 seat aircraft by other than Delta pilots, and possession is 9/10ths of the law. I could describe a bunch of scenarios where such a deal could lead to permanent change no matter how crafty the language in our favor.

Again, I have not heard of any kind of deal such as this being floated anywhere, by anybody. I will be in CQ on thursday and friday to poke around and see what I can dig up. I have seen a lot of support for me on this board, and I truly appreciate it. At the same time, it may not be enough. Get the word out to vote. Convince your friends to vote. It's important.

CS
Hey bud,
I threw this out there because I have been hearing this type of chatter for some time.
C-Series needs to fly if we are going to commit.
The 195 would be a great short term fix, but it would cost to much to put it here for a few short years

yada yada yada
Hearing this type of thing makes me think that 1) it might be something that the company may ask for, 2) it may be something that if asked for, if the carrot was big enough might be taken.

It makes a lot of sense, but from a long term perspective is the worst thing we could allow.

I agree that it is nothing that I have been told in black and white. There is no rumblings from the union about this, but it makes enough sense to get guys thinking a long these terms.

I agree you have a lot of support. Great letter today. Communication is not something we should fear!

I encourage everyone to vote in the 44 elections. If you know someone here that has not made their mind up, have them vote. We have some very capable CA and FO candidates to vote for.
Call or e-mail them as well. We are willing to answer any questions. That is why many of us are running.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 10:42 AM
  #16875  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

I think that how you term what has happened in Section One depends on your perspective. Some will call it a sale, others will call say it was taken at gun point, and others will say we have given up nothing. It all depends on how you want to frame your argument.

Fact is that we need to be forward looking going forward and realize that the scenario that I laid out is a possibility, and one that we need to be very keen to.
IMHO what is, is, and there is nothing we can do to change the past, but doing the same thing over and over expecting different results is the definition of insanity. So lets change the way we do things. Our best thinking has gotten us here.

Number one, communicate!
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 12:02 PM
  #16876  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: MD88A
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Source please. At the LCP meeting the word was that SOC was on track for the end of Dec, but there are other things that will not be completed before the first quarter or so. (None of that had anything to do with pilots or flight crew.) There was nothing said about an AE prior to the first of the year. That doesn't make what you said untrue, but I am skeptical. I would sincerely hope that a pre-Christmas AE would NOT happen because it will ruin the holidays for a lot of people... besides, they couldn't start training anyway before the end of the year so what would be the purpose?
I was there as well but things change..........
sevenfiveseven is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 12:27 PM
  #16877  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by sevenfiveseven
I was there as well but things change..........
Not to mention JG specifically said that we can easily move up SOC to mid December if desired.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 12:29 PM
  #16878  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,747
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Has anyone actually heard a Rep, or ALPA staffer, say anything about even considering giving up a seat, a jet, or a job? Any credible reports out there, or is this conjecture?
No, I haven't heard a Rep or anyone from ALPA say anything about giving anything up, but I didn't hear them talk about Non-Flying Lines (NFLs) either, and that LOA happened pretty quickly.

I just think that by people letting their reps know how they feel, it can maybe head something off before it happens or get some intel or feel which way the wind is blowing.
iaflyer is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 01:27 PM
  #16879  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Free Bird's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 799
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
If there is a "history" of selling scope concessions, you should at least be able to name one.
LOA #19 is something that imo should have never been put in front of the pilot group because of the Scope language. The company needed this agreement, not a want, they needed it. DALPA sold this as "it's just our scope plus the NWA scope" that certainly doesn't make it right. DALPA should of told the company if they want the merger, they're not going to get 255 70 seaters.
By way of comparison, AMR can have 25 70 seat jets!!!! Continental can't have ANY 70 seat jets. If those numbers don't get your attention I don't what will.

And the flock voted for what the union wanted? I think the MEC members unanimously voted for this, am I wrong? Who in their right mind would think that 255 70 seaters was a good idea? But wait it gets better, something along the lines of for every mainline jet Delta takes delivery of the company gets 3 more RJ's. Am I wrong on that?

Put all of that together and it is among, if not the worst SCOPE in the industry.

LOA #19 had nothing to do with BK, IMO DALPA should of held the line on scope.
Free Bird is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 01:38 PM
  #16880  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CVG767A's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 767ER capt
Posts: 1,190
Default Warning: completely off topic

I'm posting this here because I need an answer pretty quickly,and this thread gets more traffic than any of the others.

I'm charged with putting together a CARE package for a Delta guy who's in Iraq. What kind of things are most appreciated by the guys over there? No guesses or assumptions, please: I can do that. What I'm looking for is firsthand information, or direct feedback from someone who was there.

Thanks in advance for your help!
CVG767A is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices