Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2014, 09:38 AM
  #167911  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flying Elvis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: Utah Chapter
Posts: 391
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
That's it exactly. Any rest that is 24 hours or greater is defined as a non-fly-day and is therefore treated essentially as an X-day. Any you're right -- they could assign you 30 hours of rest followed immediately by a trip or short call, so long as they give you both at the same time.
Thanks. Should've thought to look in the definitions, but there it is::

169. “Non-fly day” means a day or 24-hour period during which a pilot:
a. does not perform flying for the Company,
b. is not scheduled to perform flying for the Company,
c. does not participate in training, other than distributed training (including travel days),
d. does not perform an SLI duty period (including a flex day),
e. is not on Company business,
f. is not removed from his scheduled rotation for the convenience of the Company, or
g. is not on long call or short call.

And once defined as a non-fly day, the rest of the PWA verbiage in Sec 23 makes sense.

I'll figure this stuff out by about the time I retire!

Thanks again!
Flying Elvis is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 09:41 AM
  #167912  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
+1 .............
Management came to us because they needed our help. Relief. Concessions.

And we, like we always do, gave it to them.

You can like it or hate it, but pretending that management is not in a big bind with all the training coming their way is disingenuous.
gzsg is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 09:52 AM
  #167913  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
Management came to us because they needed our help. Relief. Concessions.

And we, like we always do, gave it to them.

You can like it or hate it, but pretending that management is not in a big bind with all the training coming their way is disingenuous.
The company obviously wants our help here, or they wouldn't even be talking to us about it, but I fail to see an early out program as a concession.

I see the loss of our highest paying jobs as a "concession". I see the Virgin code share, with them still flying 747's to the US of A, while we are parking ours, as a concession.

Now, how do we want to mitigate that concession? Do we just keep all those senior pilots, crammed down onto your equipment, perhaps displacing a lot of guys to lesser paying equipment? That would be a concession.

OR...do we let them retire early?

I don't see an early retirement program to mitigate displacements as a concession. Perhaps we should use this training waterfall leverage to help fix our JV imbalance?

Last edited by Timbo; 09-07-2014 at 10:03 AM.
Timbo is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 09:59 AM
  #167914  
meh
 
Roadkill's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So when we park the 757s, I can hardly wait for the targeted retirement proposal that will come out to the 757 community to prevent stagnation and displacements to the 737/320/-88/717 guys.....
YES! This is spot on-- they haven't been worried for several years about how all the displacements off the ER have been stagnating all of us at the bottom!
Roadkill is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 10:00 AM
  #167915  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo

I see the loss of our highest paying jobs as a "concession".
How do you figure that? We do this to ourselves. I'll say it anyway. Bigger pays more and we do not make aircraft fleet decisions.
tsquare is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 10:01 AM
  #167916  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
That's it exactly. Any rest that is 24 hours or greater is defined as a non-fly-day and is therefore treated essentially as an X-day. Any you're right -- they could assign you 30 hours of rest followed immediately by a trip or short call, so long as they give you both at the same time.
What about the McFadden interpretation Scenario #1 ?

It seems to me that a FAR 117 30 hour rest is NOT the same as a regular X day. They can't require us to be aware of any duty that was not assigned BEFORE the 30 hours began.

The FAA says any obligation to check your schedule OR acknowledge duty breaks the rest.

Read Scenario #1 and the 2 questions:

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...rpretation.pdf

I think Flying Elvis' first post was correct. If you haven't been assigned something before starting the 30 hours then you just go on long call at the end. There is no "Last non-fly day" 9 hours prior self notification type situation when it is FAA required rest.

Last edited by Check Essential; 09-07-2014 at 10:27 AM.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 10:10 AM
  #167917  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
How do you figure that? We do this to ourselves. I'll say it anyway. Bigger pays more and we do not make aircraft fleet decisions.
I know, and I almost agree with you, the thing I worry about is; once you go to Longevity Based Pay, and decouple pay from productivity, how do you justify paying -anyone- more than an RJ 50 pays?

The argument can be made that any airplane that flies 6 legs a day is 'more work' (for the pilots) and therefore it should pay the most....right?
Timbo is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 10:10 AM
  #167918  
meh
 
Roadkill's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 828
Default

From the latest emailed flight Operations update:

Pilot Hiring Update
As of September 2, 610 pilots have entered training in 2014. We estimate there will be a total of 880 new hires for all of 2014, and we currently have approval to hire 340 pilots in 2015


Ok, before they said we had approved hiring approx 90 a month all next year... that's 1080 folks. NOW they say we only "currently" have approval to hire 340... this seems a deliberate and different amount. Folks will say they are approving it chunk by chunk... but I'm worried this is another dot for us to apply to the biq question of the 747 retirement... suddenly we don't have approval to hire 740 of the pilots we expected to hire next year? I wonder where we can find 740 pilots next year suddenly if we don't hire them?
....
Roadkill is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 10:10 AM
  #167919  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrails's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,947
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
I see the loss of our highest paying jobs as a "concession". I see the Virgin code share, with them still flying 747's to the US of A, while we are parking ours, as a concession.
Not that it was ever a 747 route anytime recently, but as long as you're on the topic, Virgin is starting LHR-DTW service.
contrails is offline  
Old 09-07-2014, 10:15 AM
  #167920  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Originally Posted by Roadkill
From the latest emailed flight Operations update:

Pilot Hiring Update
As of September 2, 610 pilots have entered training in 2014. We estimate there will be a total of 880 new hires for all of 2014, and we currently have approval to hire 340 pilots in 2015


Ok, before they said we had approved hiring approx 90 a month all next year... that's 1080 folks. NOW they say we only "currently" have approval to hire 340... this seems a deliberate and different amount. Folks will say they are approving it chunk by chunk... but I'm worried this is another dot for us to apply to the biq question of the 747 retirement... suddenly we don't have approval to hire 740 of the pilots we expected to hire next year? I wonder where we can find 740 pilots next year suddenly if we don't hire them?
....
I think they can find about 500 of them in the 747 category.

(which I think is your point.)
Timbo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices