Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2014, 06:06 AM
  #167121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: undefined
Posts: 328
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
It seems no airline can justify the whales. They are being retired as fast as airlines can park them. Keep in mind that Delta's 747-400's are among the very oldest flying. NW was the launch customer if I recall correctly.
I doubt this will happen but there might be a glimmer of hope. The jets being parked are leased. Perhaps were playing hardball on the lease rates. The value of the jets is scrap value only. The owners at best can part them out. Since Delta has not displaced pilots perhaps it's a ploy for lower lease rates. Still no one seems to want them worldwide and the economic numbers for parking them were compelling when given to the union.
While NW was the launch customer for the 747-400, the ones being parked immediately are not the oldest. They are not the ones with the worst MX histories, they are being parked due to lease negotiations. 6311,6312 and 6316, two are mid aged, maybe 20 years old. 6316 was delivered in the 2003 time frame. The sole "old plane" 6301, is being used as a spare until the end of the year.

As a bit of 744 trivia, 6301 was the first 747 produced, but was not delivered to NWA for several years. it was leased back by Boeing for testing. 6302 was delivered in 1988.

I too suspected they were playing hardball with the leasors. the bankruptcy saw amazing rate reductions. Some of those leases are up for renegotiations. I think that the lessor called our bluff... negotiations are only as strong as your willingness to walk away from a deal.
pilotc90a is offline  
Old 08-29-2014, 06:24 AM
  #167122  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
Is there anything in the PWA that prevents targeted early-retirement programs?
A seniority list perhaps?
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-29-2014, 06:46 AM
  #167123  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,991
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So you're saying that they are offering it to select pilots on select 4 engine airplanes? Hell no. Sorry. That's wrong. Displace 'em, and train 'em.
If the junior most whale Capt is seniority number 500 for example - the early out should be an option for every pilot 1-500.

Then again maybe we are pushing for reduced lease rates and this is all three dimensional-time warp-ninja management Chess.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 08-29-2014, 06:54 AM
  #167124  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Agree with Tsquare and GG. Early outs are something the company needs to avoid a very expensive and manpower-draining training cascade. (of course the company's bean counters didn't look at those limfacs when making their decision). So now they're up a creek.

They need to provide incentive if they want to offer them (in seniority order, of course).

However...I see DALPA (and us) getting rolled. Again.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 08-29-2014, 06:55 AM
  #167125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DogWhisperer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: MD-88 F/O
Posts: 1,004
Default

Super Premium Retirement...
DogWhisperer is offline  
Old 08-29-2014, 07:01 AM
  #167126  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Agree with Tsquare and GG. Early outs are something the company needs to avoid a very expensive and manpower-draining training cascade. (of course the company's bean counters didn't look at those limfacs when making their decision). So now they're up a creek.

They need to provide incentive if they want to offer them (in seniority order, of course).

However...I see DALPA (and us) getting rolled. Again.
I don't think we are gonna get rolled here. I just don't think we are gonna get anything substantial out of it other than not having displacements that imho will be short term anyway.
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-29-2014, 07:12 AM
  #167127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I don't think we are gonna get rolled here. I just don't think we are gonna get anything substantial out of it other than not having displacements that imho will be short term anyway.


As long as they offer it to.everyone in seniority order.

If not, then we can pass on this deal.
gzsg is offline  
Old 08-29-2014, 07:15 AM
  #167128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So you're saying that they are offering it to select pilots on select 4 engine airplanes? Hell no. Sorry. That's wrong. Displace 'em, and train 'em.
Agree 100%.

Never thought i'd see the day.
Jerry
gzsg is offline  
Old 08-29-2014, 07:23 AM
  #167129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RonRicco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Captain
Posts: 830
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
As long as they offer it to.everyone in seniority order.

If not, then we can pass on this deal.
Exactly. As long as it is in senioirty order, what is the big deal?

I am not getting some of the angst with this whole (possible) deal. It almost seems like some would rather have them displace these pilots (causing more possible displacements) than to try and mitigate the damage?

Which course of action provides the best possible outcome for the pilot group and why? (Not a rhetorical question and assuming we aren't giving anything up)
RonRicco is offline  
Old 08-29-2014, 07:26 AM
  #167130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(or even 737 driver, damn that thing is senior for no obvious reason).
Bucking Bar,

The 737 is senior for a number of reasons. Not everyone wants to fly long-haul international. The 737 has the best trips in the system. It's all about quality of life. That is why it's senior.

I'm middle of the pack on the 737. I can hold international on larger aircraft in my base. I choose not to because of the lifestyle the 737 affords. Guys senior to me aren't going anywhere, either. It's all about lifestyle.
orvil is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices