Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2014, 12:19 PM
  #165951  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hillbilly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 950
Default

Originally Posted by index
Three questions for you Hillbilly:

1. Did you read the letter by Mr. Private Writings--the one that was drafted with the assistance of ALPA National staff attorneys?

2. Do you actually believe what's in the letter?

3. If yes, do you actually believe that a website with an anti-DPA message just accidentally and coincidentally showed up on the DPA website?

Our profession is made up of skeptics. It's part of our DNA. It's what helps keep us safe and alive. Most of us can sniff BS out a mile away. This one stinks a hundred miles out.

1. Yes

2. I don't think it's false. I do think it read very scripted and struck me as odd with the choice of words, etc. and it did raise my BS flag initially. Then I realized that the only part of any significance (in my opinion) was the part about how the individual admitted to not having the skillset necessary to hack anything and the redirect was discovered when they logged on to their own site. Hacking is the accusation after all.

3. No I don't. I suspect when the person logged onto their personal site and saw they were getting redirects they had some fun with it. Not the best headwork, but also not criminal hacking as far as I can tell.

I agree that the whole thing stinks to high heaven.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hillbilly is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 12:21 PM
  #165952  
Wind the clock beoch
 
index's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Index,

Why hasn't the DPA published the server logs?
I don't speak for DPA. I don't even know what server logs are.

Why hasn't ALPA published the last contract survey results?

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
One guy had a theory that a pilot had a domain "deltapilot" and the DPA accidently left the "s" off of their "Deltapilots" domain. If so, the DPA actually was responsible for the redirect. The "deltapilot" domain guy then decided to have some fun ... which would have been funny if not for the fact that the DPA had run out of ideas and this was an opportunity to raise funds and identify an "enemy."

Dunno, but that explanation make(s) sense to me. The DPA discovered their error and fixed it.
Did an ALPA national attorney help you draft this nonsense? You think the DPA hacked their own website? That's really too much Bar, but entirely within your M.O. to blame the victim. Why did Mr. Private Writings contact ALPA attorneys, Bar? Why would they seek protection and legal representation if they know they had done nothing wrong?


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
It has to be scary to have a bunch of malcontents all focus their attention on you, empowered with half price legal services engaged on a political mission.
And yet those "half price legal services" managed to defeat ALPA in court on Thursday. It seems ALPA's purported attorney-client privilege claim as to the identity of Mr. Private Writings was found to NOT EXIST.
index is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 12:21 PM
  #165953  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by index
3bil,

O.J. said he was innocent. What's your point?
OJ? Wow, you're grasping at straws there. Not even remotely similar to this. My point is that it's blatantly obvious that DPA yet again has had the wind taken out of their sails. I'm sure the legal bills are beginning to stack up quite high on TC. There is zero evidence that DPA's website was indeed hacked. For all we know, TC did it himself. After all, they filed a lawsuit against John Doe. After they publicly accused DALPA of hacking their website, and getting the FBI involved. A slam dunk case indeed.

Name calling? Good to see you're capable of mature debate.

Last edited by johnso29; 08-17-2014 at 12:39 PM.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 12:21 PM
  #165954  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hillbilly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 950
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Our union has lawyers who will protect a pilot from the company. Do those lawyers also protect a pilot from federal prosecution?

Yes if it is directly related to his employment. That's irrelevant in this case. They were hit with a subpoena.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hillbilly is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 12:26 PM
  #165955  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by index
Anything to protect your beloved club.
Aren't you a member?

Isn't this "our" club?

... and we might all be making an erroneous assumption that ALPA is defending this person. ALPA may stop at simply being responsive to discovery that it had to respond to.

Now the problem is ALPA may have turned over documentation which was more properly "work product" and protected by attorney - client privilege.

IMHO we should do more to protect "our beloved club." We need a strong union to achieve our goals and protect our jobs. Way too often we throw our association under the bus, getting in trouble collectively rather than making the difficult choices. ALPA takes a lot of heat ... defending pilots.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 12:27 PM
  #165956  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Hillbilly
Yes if it is directly related to his employment. That's irrelevant in this case. They were hit with a subpoena.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm a let the chips fall where they may kind of guy. However, in fairness, and with significant distance from the DPA, this last DALPA posting on the "hacking" topic is a pretty far cry from what has come out in the past.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 12:27 PM
  #165957  
Wind the clock beoch
 
index's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by Hillbilly
1. Yes

2. I don't think it's false. I do think it read very scripted and struck me as odd with the choice of words, etc. and it did raise my BS flag initially. Then I realized that the only part of any significance (in my opinion) was the part about how the individual admitted to not having the skillset necessary to hack anything and the redirect was discovered when they logged on to their own site. Hacking is the accusation after all.

3. No I don't. I suspect when the person logged onto their personal site and saw they were getting redirects they had some fun with it. Not the best headwork, but also not criminal hacking as far as I can tell.

I agree that the whole thing stinks to high heaven.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Okay, fair enough. Thanks for your honesty.

You said that the letter is scripted and used an odd choice of words. I agree.

Would it matter to you if those "private writings and thoughts of a personal nature" actually WERE the anti-DPA information that was published on DPA's website?

And would it matter to you (and only time will tell if this is the case), if Mr. Private Writings turns out to be an ALPA insider?

Would either of those change your opinion as to how high this thing stinks?
index is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 12:40 PM
  #165958  
Wind the clock beoch
 
index's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Aren't you a member?
Of course I am, but it's been a long time since ALPA has even remotely represented me. And I'm not alone in thinking that.

You advocated in an earlier post that members of DPA should be expelled and that they don't "deserve the privilege of membership." Way to build that "unity" Bar. "Unity" is merely a false rallying cry to fall in line with whatever the chairman says.


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Isn't this "our" club?
While it may be your "club" it's not mine. It's supposed to be a union. Until our "leadership" stops going to management birthday parties, watching baseball games with the CEO, and having our national "club" president going on a wall street interview tour telling investors our "contracts are mature" and that ALPA's contract demands won't prove onerous to airlines, we are going to get more of the same.
index is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 12:40 PM
  #165959  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by index

And would it matter to you (and only time will tell if this is the case), if Mr. Private Writings turns out to be an ALPA insider?

Would either of those change your opinion as to how high this thing stinks?
How does that matter, if the guy (gal, or it) was acting completely on their own?

It boils down to harm. There was none. If anything this was a fundraising windfall and gave the DPA a lot more to talk about than their Crew Van News from before the incident took place:

QUOTE = DPA
"Tentative Agreement Voting Opens Today!

Perhaps you woke up this morning and grabbed the USA Today. You may have noticed an article describing the horrors occurring right now in China where government officials dragged a woman out of her home, covered her head, beat her and then carried her to a hospital where they forced an abortion on her, killing her 7 month old unborn child....all for not paying a $6,300 fine for having a second child! The citizens of China and the world are outraged by the actions of a governing body that would trample on its citizens.

[COLOR=#333333]ALPA has trampled on you by ignoring your survey inputs. When Reps are asked about the Contract Survey results, they declare the survey was merely "aspirational" in nature."[/quote]

If this was an "insider" out to harm the DPA, they failed. In fact they aided the DPA, helped it, funded it and sustained it.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 12:48 PM
  #165960  
Wind the clock beoch
 
index's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
And the $64,000 question ....

Does that pilot have any connection to DALPA?

(and if the answer is yes, make that $64 million)
Originally Posted by johnso29
That's been answered multiple times by DALPA. No.
How do you know that is accurate? Because DALPA says so?

I'm not sure what Check Essential means by "any connection to DALPA", it seems pretty broad.

Are you saying that Mr. Private Writings does not now hold, or hold at the time of the "hacking," any ALPA office, whether appointed or elected? Or that Mr. Private Writings was an "ALPA Volunteer" in any capacity at the time his "thoughts of a personal nature" were "intermingling" with DPA's website?
index is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices