Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2014, 08:01 AM
  #165901  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
The assumption is if you don't check it from 1500-2359, fine, but you need to check it by 0000. Of course we no longer have to notify of anything, which was a massive concession IMO. Its unprecedented that we are considered notified now upon first voicemail attempted contact. That was an earth shattering giveaway that will remain forever, long after the higher duty period average goes away during the next crisis or whatever.

I think the company will usually try and notify you, but the logic behind the concessions we gave was that since you can go NORAD for any 10 consecutive hours you want if you haven't got an assignment by then, we shifted the burden of notification to us.
I disagree. The only practical difference between C2K and today is we can now not be used before 1000, rather than 0500 as was the case in C2K. Any flying or short call that reports before noon must still be on our schedule by 1500 the day before and it's still our job to find out about it.

Any other reserve assignment continues to require notification by telephone, unless it is placed on our line prior to block in from our previous rotation.

Last edited by Alan Shore; 08-17-2014 at 08:22 AM.
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 08:19 AM
  #165902  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by ImTumbleweed
Alan,

Do you think the JV non-compliance should be included in the 2015 contract?

I think it's a stand alone issue, and should be addressed outside of contract negotiations.

What are your thoughts?
I do not. IMO, the MEC should file a grievance on April 1, 2015 and concurrently request expedited arbitration under Section 1 M. This requires that the arbitration be completed within 60 days of filing, i.e., by May 31, and that the Board render its decision within 90 days of filing, i.e., by June 30.

While we may well have exchanged openers by then, I can't imagine that we'll be anywhere close to being through Section 6, and so the two issues can remain completely separate, as they should be.
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 08:24 AM
  #165903  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
Numerous discussions with my reps have led me to believe that, while achieving consensus can in fact be quite a cumbersome process, it is quite possible and always worthwhile in the end. And the alternative, that of a dictatorship, is never preferable.

So yes. As with any democracy, there are layers to wade through and you have to be able to bring others around to your point of view to have that perspective carry the day.

I consider that neither BS nor getting nowhere. It is what it is. We can either sit behind our keyboards and wish it were different, or we can stand up and get into the game as our reps have done.
Democracy is one of the worst forms of government, it gives rise to factions, and the loss of individual rights. The alternative is not dictatorship, however, a constitution that protects the rights of the union worker. The basic right being, that a union worker should not be able to vote another union worker out of a job.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 08:25 AM
  #165904  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Democracy is one of the worst forms of government, it gives rise to factions, and the loss of individual rights. The alternative is not dictatorship, however, a constitution that protects the rights of the union worker. The basic right being, that a union worker should not be able to vote another union worker out of a job.
If you say so. But how does that relate to whether or not we trust our reps?
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 08:30 AM
  #165905  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,907
Default

I can't find historical data on green slips going back more than a few months. In Sep, for the first time since May, we have positive reserves for more than half the days of the month in the NYC 7ERB. Does this mean the chances of a relatively junior guy getting a GS are slim to none?
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 08:39 AM
  #165906  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
I do not. IMO, the MEC should file a grievance on April 1, 2015 and concurrently request expedited arbitration under Section 1 M. This requires that the arbitration be completed within 60 days of filing, i.e., by May 31, and that the Board render its decision within 90 days of filing, i.e., by June 30.

While we may well have exchanged openers by then, I can't imagine that we'll be anywhere close to being through Section 6, and so the two issues can remain completely separate, as they should be.

Maybe we should approach the company now regarding the compliance issue and see how that "proactive engagement" works for us.
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 08:44 AM
  #165907  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
Maybe we should approach the company now regarding the compliance issue and see how that "proactive engagement" works for us.
Right? I have to assume that such discussions have already taken place, but that nothing's come of it. RA will never willingly operate a route on which he cannot make money, so I'm guessing that they've told us to pack sand and that they expect to see us before the arbitrator.
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 09:06 AM
  #165908  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
The only "self-notification" is for a trip or short call that they place on our line by 1500 on our last X-day. Any other time still requires a phone call from scheduling.

And a reserve pilot no longer has the requirement to acknowledge a trip or short call that's been placed on his line.
I think there is one other instance where CS does not have to call a reserve and that is the schedule check a reserve is supposed to do upon block in from a reserve trip.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 09:18 AM
  #165909  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
I think there is one other instance where CS does not have to call a reserve and that is the schedule check a reserve is supposed to do upon block in from a reserve trip.
Good call, my fellow flamingo. And that too has not changed.
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 09:27 AM
  #165910  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RetiredFTS's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: 7ER Costar
Posts: 406
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps
You guys.... always kidding, that is clearly a Handley-Page Four shooter..


When did the AF flight attendants start wearing yellow?
RetiredFTS is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices