Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2014, 12:39 PM
  #164741  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Starcheck102's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: ATL 7ER A
Posts: 308
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Well, Obama is giving a news conference now. He's specifically shaming House Republicans into letting the Export Import Bank continue as it has. He says he doesn't understand why those House Republicans would be opposing the Export Import Bank when that bank does so much good for American jobs.

So glad ALPA national and the AFL-CIO fought so hard for Obama (twice) and fought so hard against republicans.

Back the PAC!

Carl
That is simply false. ALPA never endorsed Obama, does not endorse presidential candidates (thank GOD), and he received no money from ALPA PAC.

I could give a rat about the AFL-CIO - they don't pay dues. You pay dues, so I hope you will check the facts on this for yourself.

This is just one of several occasions when Barry has tossed American pilots under the bus. The highlights include whatever devil's bargain he made with the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, and what he directed to happen at OMB during the endgame of FAR 117.

And now this. I must say his actions make it impossible to support him as an airline pilot. I have no confidence that he is actually on the side of organized labor.

You should retract your assertion. It is as false as it is offensive to the dozen-odd Delta pilots who work very hard on the Hill. The Pilot Partisan agenda is more than just a slogan to us, it represents the only way ALPA can stay relevant and avoid getting cornered in a very toxic political environment.
Starcheck102 is offline  
Old 08-01-2014, 12:43 PM
  #164742  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
They wouldnt laugh if we refused to grant relief on the upcoming.displacements.

Sadly we will lay down and surrender faster than the French.

Ummmm OK, I'll bite. Just how do you propose "not granting relief" to upcomng displacements? Just not show up en masse for training when assigned? They can displace whomever they want, whenever they want. THEY buy the airplanes, and THEY deploy them. WE only fly them...
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-01-2014, 12:45 PM
  #164743  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Starcheck102
That is simply false. ALPA never endorsed Obama, does not endorse presidential candidates (thank GOD), and he received no money from ALPA PAC.

I could give a rat about the AFL-CIO - they don't pay dues. You pay dues, so I hope you will check the facts on this for yourself.

This is just one of several occasions when Barry has tossed American pilots under the bus. The highlights include whatever devil's bargain he made with the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, and what he directed to happen at OMB during the endgame of FAR 117.

And now this. I must say his actions make it impossible to support him as an airline pilot. I have no confidence that he is actually on the side of organized labor.

You should retract your assertion. It is as false as it is offensive to the dozen-odd Delta pilots who work very hard on the Hill. The Pilot Partisan agenda is more than just a slogan to us, it represents the only way ALPA can stay relevant and avoid getting cornered in a very toxic political environment.
Carl?... retract? You must be joking.
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-01-2014, 12:47 PM
  #164744  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Permanently scarred
Posts: 1,707
Default

Originally Posted by FrankCobretti
Casual Observer pretty much makes the argument, but I'll make my own version:

As you know, LBFM stands for "Little Brown ****ing Machine."

"Hooker" isn't racist. "Lady of the night" isn't racist. "Little Brown ****ing Machine" is racist because it (a) specifies two racial characteristics [stature and skin color] and (b) pairs them with a dehumanizing term [****ing machine].

Ask yourself, would you have been equally comfortable with someone writing that captains just wanted to get to Atlanta so they could see little black Sambo?

I'm sure those who use the term mean nothing by it. They probably picked it up before they became critical thinkers, and they've probably never been challenged on it before. But they wouldn't be pilots if they weren't smart. Upon further reflection, they'll come around.
So that I don't offend someone or their race in the future, I ask for clarity: If I use the term "White Trash" am I using a racial term? Thanks ahead of time.
GunshipGuy is offline  
Old 08-01-2014, 12:51 PM
  #164745  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
So that I don't offend someone or their race in the future, I ask for clarity: If I use the term "White Trash" am I using a racial term? Thanks ahead of time.
I take offense at the term "Cracker". Does that help?
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-01-2014, 12:52 PM
  #164746  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FrankCobretti's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Top
Posts: 472
Default

I'll be happy to answer all your race-related questions in PM, Gunship Guy.
FrankCobretti is offline  
Old 08-01-2014, 12:56 PM
  #164747  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Permanently scarred
Posts: 1,707
Default

Originally Posted by FrankCobretti
I feel sheepish this morning. I made my point. Then, I let someone get under my skin, got angry (internet angry is both the worst and silliest kind of angry), and loosed a rhetorical flourish that destroyed my credibility.

That's some rookie forensics, right there.
But if it was just what you truly believe then was it really so bad?
GunshipGuy is offline  
Old 08-01-2014, 12:59 PM
  #164748  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Since I can't paste the exact words here, I'll paraphrase from page 2 of the Q & A, emphasis mine: '...notwithstanding reductions in trans-Atlantic growth plans, the combined JV trans-Atlantic network will grow this winter by 3 percent, though not as much originally planned.'

If it was Delta Air Lines that would be growing by 3% in the Atlantic, they would have said Delta Air Lines. Instead, they said "the JV Trans-Atlantic network." Further, they said the reductions in the Atlantic at Delta will free up those Delta aircraft to fly Pacific routes abandoned by the 744.

They couldn't have been more clear. Delta will be flying less Delta aircraft in the Atlantic. The JV network will grow by 3% in the Atlantic. This will widen our imbalance in the JV and it will occur during the "cure period" of our scope section.

Carl
Carl, let me fix TWO key wordS you decided to omit. "They said reductions in the Atlantic GROWTH PLANS at Delta will free up aircraft for the Pacific.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 08-01-2014, 01:00 PM
  #164749  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
We don't know how much EASKs the AF/KL side is going to be reducing, so don't assume the other side of the Atlantic is static.
Management just said the JV network will be growing 3%, but that 3% is lower growth than they anticipated. The JV will be growing 3% while we pull Delta aircraft off the Atlantic and put them on the Pacific. The JV imbalance has just been made even worse...during the "cure" period. It's a blatant in your face dismissal of our MEC as any threat to management whatsoever. This was the action to bolster Richard's statement that labor risk has been completely taken off the table at Delta.

Originally Posted by shiznit
There is leverage there, but like T says, how do you remedy the violation without "selling scope for pay"???
This is troubling coming from you shiznit. You're supposed to know this stuff. Not to mention it's been stated at least a dozen times in the last few days. The remedy is either getting back into compliance, or ending the JV. If they have to fly half full jets across the Atlantic to get into compliance, then that's what they need to do. Either that, or end the JV. We can't sell pilot jobs anymore.

What's your position on that shiznit?

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 08-01-2014, 01:05 PM
  #164750  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by FrankCobretti
I feel sheepish this morning. I made my point. Then, I let someone get under my skin, got angry (internet angry is both the worst and silliest kind of angry), and loosed a rhetorical flourish that destroyed my credibility.

That's some rookie forensics, right there.
You did no such thing Frank. Racism is always perceived through the window of our own experiences. You're a solid guy here with good opinions.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices