Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2014, 06:48 AM
  #163651  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hoserpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: maddoggy dog
Posts: 1,026
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Actually the damages would be pilot upgrades lost. They would figure out how many jobs it would have taken to make up the capacity change required. They would then figure out the net change in pilot pay to upgrade from say a 737 to a 767 to fill in the gaps. We don't get the revenues from the flights, we just get the costs for the upgrade jobs lost.

I get what your saying but why do we only do it that way? What about the FO's that could've stayed in their widebody seats at a higher pay rate? All those seats and more flying across the board equates to higher paychecks for all delta pilots. All of the money generated by the company for violating our scope should be available to us. They violated the contract.
hoserpilot is offline  
Old 07-23-2014, 06:57 AM
  #163652  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by hoserpilot
If the only remedy/penalty is a financial one lets make them pay dearly. Since our ALPA money folks are so sharp let them calculate the fine. Count every flight that the Big D made that was out of compliance. Someone somewhere surely knows the revenue generated by each flight. Flights X revenue = Big money fine.
Damages are calculable as alfa alluded. Lawyers do that sort of thing all the time. (Maybe we can get that clown that got $23 billion for her client's idiot husband that didn't know smoking was dangerous) But I highly doubt that we would be able to get any punitive damages of consequence.
tsquare is offline  
Old 07-23-2014, 07:16 AM
  #163653  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
This industry is now officially an oligopoly. I have declared it so. Any downward amendment to profitsharing is off the table.... or should be.
Agree 100%!!!!

IMO management's top priority will be to reduce our profit sharing.

Your oligopoly point is spot on. This is not the air line industry we grew up with. Our debt is decreasing and our profits are increasing.

Keep your hands on your wallets!
gzsg is offline  
Old 07-23-2014, 07:20 AM
  #163654  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by hoserpilot
I get what your saying but why do we only do it that way? What about the FO's that could've stayed in their widebody seats at a higher pay rate? All those seats and more flying across the board equates to higher paychecks for all delta pilots. All of the money generated by the company for violating our scope should be available to us. They violated the contract.
When I said upgrades, I didn't mean upgrades to Captain, I meant upgrades in seats which would include FO's, I am sorry for the imprecise language. You will never win some argument in front of an arbitrator about getting the revenue from the flights. In fact, the company might argue that the reason they didn't fly those flights is because they would have lost money. Each side could put up graphs and charts and in the end, the arbitrators would concentrate on the jobs (both seats or all three seats if you include relief) and what the incremental income that pilots could have gotten from it. The super difficult part will be deciding which pilots get the money and I don't even want to attempt to say anything about that.

An upgrade from 737 to 767 averages about $7,000 per year. So for 100 crews (1 CA and 2FO) it would be about $2.1 million per year. I have no idea if 100 is the right number but I just used a round number for comparison purposes. So if you used three years you get $6 million which would be about $600 per pilot if you did an equal distribution. (this is just for example, read nothing more into it).

In short, the company is clearly in violation and it looks doubtful they will make good in the cure period. Just don't expect it to start raining money when the arbitrator rules.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 07-23-2014, 07:40 AM
  #163655  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,907
Default

RA on CNBC this morning. No more Delta flights over Iran, Iraq, Syria, Ukraine or Afghanistan (or NK.)

Delta waiting on return of Tel Aviv flights: CEO
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 07-23-2014, 07:43 AM
  #163656  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg

IMO management's top priority will be to reduce our profit sharing.
I highly doubt that, but it will be something they would like to get.
tsquare is offline  
Old 07-23-2014, 07:43 AM
  #163657  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
When I said upgrades, I didn't mean upgrades to Captain, I meant upgrades in seats which would include FO's, I am sorry for the imprecise language. You will never win some argument in front of an arbitrator about getting the revenue from the flights. In fact, the company might argue that the reason they didn't fly those flights is because they would have lost money. Each side could put up graphs and charts and in the end, the arbitrators would concentrate on the jobs (both seats or all three seats if you include relief) and what the incremental income that pilots could have gotten from it. The super difficult part will be deciding which pilots get the money and I don't even want to attempt to say anything about that.

An upgrade from 737 to 767 averages about $7,000 per year. So for 100 crews (1 CA and 2FO) it would be about $2.1 million per year. I have no idea if 100 is the right number but I just used a round number for comparison purposes. So if you used three years you get $6 million which would be about $600 per pilot if you did an equal distribution. (this is just for example, read nothing more into it).

In short, the company is clearly in violation and it looks doubtful they will make good in the cure period. Just don't expect it to start raining money when the arbitrator rules.

If you look at the shortfall over the entire time period it's about 2.5 flights a day. A average flight to Europe takes about 1500 block hours a month. Call it around 4000 block hours total. 100 jobs sounds about right.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-23-2014, 07:57 AM
  #163658  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,242
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
RA on CNBC this morning. No more Delta flights over Iran, Iraq, Syria, Ukraine or Afghanistan (or NK.)

Delta waiting on return of Tel Aviv flights: CEO
I was a little surprised he included Iran. Having done AMS-BOM a lot I always found the Iranian controllers to be very friendly and helpful. I can only assume Delta is using the southern route which is much longer and more costly.
maddogmax is offline  
Old 07-23-2014, 08:07 AM
  #163659  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by maddogmax
I was a little surprised he included Iran. Having done AMS-BOM a lot I always found the Iranian controllers to be very friendly and helpful. I can only assume Delta is using the southern route which is much longer and more costly.
The Iranians were far more friendly then the Saudis we will have to deal with now.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-23-2014, 08:37 AM
  #163660  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Is this the same guy who voted against the Narita agreement and then in public touted it as a outstanding achievement under KR's leadership? That left several people somewhat befuddled!
Did it ever once occur to you to actually respond to the body of a text...rather than attempting to disqualify the author?

Read those council 20 notes again and try to respond to them.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices