Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2014, 06:34 AM
  #162391  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

If you don't participate in basic union things like surveys/votes etc., I don't think you have the right to complain about what comes along.....

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 07-11-2014, 06:36 AM
  #162392  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,595
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I'll bet survey participation is even lower this time. There are many pilots like myself who will never fill out one again. Why? I feel our union ignored the last survey and did what they thought was best for us. They came up woefully short on pay. Sold large rj scope, profit sharing, and work rules to get those small raises. I am voting no for next contract without even looking at it. I know it will be no where near my expectations. I learned that last contract.
Wow, just wow! Thankfully most pilots don't share your attitude and we have been able to go from chapter 11 back to the top of the industry in a relatively short period of time. At least this way you certainly won't be able to complain that you were ignored in this contract.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-11-2014, 07:07 AM
  #162393  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,016
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Wow, just wow! Thankfully most pilots don't share your attitude and we have been able to go from chapter 11 back to the top of the industry in a relatively short period of time. At least this way you certainly won't be able to complain that you were ignored in this contract.
I can complain as much as I want. That's what being a dues paying member gets me. I will vote no to the contract if it does not meet my expectations (it won't). I don't see the benefit to filling out a survey that our union is just going to ignore anyway.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 07-11-2014, 07:19 AM
  #162394  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I can complain as much as I want. That's what being a dues paying member gets me. I will vote no to the contract if it does not meet my expectations (it won't). I don't see the benefit to filling out a survey that our union is just going to ignore anyway.
Do you SERIOUSLY think they just flat out ignored it? Or do you not want to accept that maybe you are not of a majority opinion?

If you believe they ignored it for some black helicopter desire to screw everyone including themselves in the process, well that is a really pathetic view of those working on our behalf. And if that's truly the case, I hope you don't participate, we don't need garbage stats junking up the data.
tsquare is offline  
Old 07-11-2014, 07:29 AM
  #162395  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: A330 First Officer
Posts: 1,465
Default

I talked to some SLC reps while on a productivity sit in SLC. They had their power point up and running about the state of the union. What I walked away with is that they, meaning DALPA, is going to try and avoid protracted negotiations because our financial people are speculating that there is going to be a down turn in either 2016 or 2017.

They also pointed out that we are top of the food chain in relation to our peers in the industry, so we need to figure out how to get more money in our pockets without huge pay rate jumps because the company won't have us that much more than the other airlines. This, however, becomes a catch 22 because any kind of pay increase in certain other areas (I said we could adopt the DOD travel per diem rates which would be a huge increase for some cities)would not be entertained because the company would have to give it to the flight attendants. So does anyone have some better ideas?

Mine were:
1. DOD per diem rates
2. Definitely increase training pay.
3. Increase vacation pay
4. Increase number of vacation weeks
5. Have trip drops, with pay, for touching vacations like the old contract
6. Increase retirement contribution

I know the company likes to talk about our peers in the industry, however to date it is my belief that Delta does not have a peer. Because of how we went about our merger compared to UCON and AA/USA/AWA, we are at a competitive advantage and at least a few years ahead of the competition. I know the bean counters on Wall street don't like to look at it that way but that is the truth of the matter.

I do know this, I will vote no to any contract which has me partially financing my own pay raises by giving something up that we negotiated and paid for in previous contracts. (Im talking about profit sharing). We negotiated it, the company gave it to the other employee groups, then when the check started becoming really big they needed to get it back from the other groups but needed us to give it up first. Sorry that piggy bank is now closed.
DALMD88FO is offline  
Old 07-11-2014, 08:03 AM
  #162396  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Starcheck102

Having read your posts for several years (on many forums, I believe), I doubt that it is possible for anyone to deliver a tentative agreement that you would publicly endorse.
Not quite right. It's possible. I've made it clear what that would take. However, I tend to agree with you that it's not possible with DALPA. That would require a major change in mindset (as demonstrated by your post) and, well, I just don't see that happening.



Originally Posted by Starcheck102
The first possibility is that DAL wants something changed (like sick leave or maybe seat lock), or maybe they actually want an efficient operation during some additional expansion combined with a tricky interval of retirements and hiring. I am firmly opposed to pay banding. They have a chance to have generally happy and productive pilots here while UAL and AMR are stuck in a briar patch. Early TA, with vanilla improvements to pay and time off. The end result is that Delta pilots are the highest paid in the industry.
Yep. The proverbial "pretty pup in an ugly litter." We're the highest paid in the industry now (based on DALPA's view of it, which excludes the cargo carriers). Yet the standard of living our pay rates support is currently 34% below where it was in, for example, 1986 or 2004.

While a nice side benefit is that it doesn't require much effort and management and us can all be one big happy family with no controversy, I don't like your proposed "end result."

Originally Posted by Starcheck102
The second possibility I envision is less rosy, a protracted fight defined by knucklehead moves on both sides of the table. In this case, it's a four-year drag defined by stonewalling and a lively game of chicken with hostages and probably another trip to see a judge. I think we would still end up with top rates, because MD knows how to run that sort of operation (based on his experience with C2K and helping Spirit run their successful strike). Despite the top rates, retro pay always comes up short.
It's not going to be easy. That's for sure. Management is very happy and very confident that they sleighed the dragon of pilot costs once and for all via bankruptcy. And DALPA has given them no reason to think otherwise. For me, it comes down to whether we give up and accept this "new normal" in compensation for our profession, or we work to restore the value of this profession back to more in line with where it was for several decades. Your mindset is in line with the former. Congratulations, because your mindset is also in line with the prevailing view in DALPA. I'm sure that makes for a more enjoyable echo chamber experience for you.

Last edited by DAL 88 Driver; 07-11-2014 at 08:19 AM.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 07-11-2014, 08:18 AM
  #162397  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
OK, if I have mis-characterized the hard liners, then it is YOU that needs to answer the questions yourself asked above. Mostly what I hear though is to set a goal and come out with a statement to management that we expect to be recompensated fot the sacrifices made. Cool. I can get on board with that. Then what? What is the plan for achieving those goals? That is where our breakdown in communication is occurring. All I see from the hard line side is symbolism over substance. Set goals, make a statement. OK... Now how do you achieve that? The Atilla-the-Purples are ready to start the village afire, and then sit back and wait until the checks start rolling in because the company will be so stressed out that they have no other choice.
I don't know anybody (including myself) who wants to "burn the house down." That's a straw man and you know it (or should know it).

There are no easy answers. Anything significant, challenging, and worthwhile in life takes a lot of hard work and takes some time. Generally, it works better if you get started on a major objective ASAP rather than putting it off, say, 10 years.

Where do we go from here?

We set the objective and develop a plan to achieve it. As I see it, that STARTS with making our objective known to our own pilot group and to management. Expectations need to be set that are quite different than the expectations we've set over the past decade. Otherwise, all we're going to see is more of the same.

I'm sure that's not enough detail for you. Sorry, I'm not a strategic planning expert. But I do know pretty much what restoration would look like for us and what it looks like when someone is trying (or not trying) to achieve it.

Do we set the objective to restore our profession and what's left of our careers?

Absolutely yes! And make it clear to all concerned parties.

Originally Posted by tsquare
Lastly, what I find reeeeeeally interesting is your statement about "pretty basic math". Again... I will ask you how long you will be willing to wait for that restoration, because the TVM is a really basic mathematical concept. What is really ironic is that you are an advocate of restoration and as such talk about it in terms of the 34% degradation in buying power, yet you still seem to ignore it going forward. Tell ya what. Why don't you calculate what that buying power will be in the event we have to run the full course of Section 6 (and you can make an assumption about how long it will be before the NMB releases us.. I'll leave it up to you on that). And then do it under an assumption that we get parked for 2 or 3 years. I would actually be very interested to see that. How much more would we need then to achieve restoration?
That's why we needed to get started several years ago. But if you want to throw in the towel now, I guess you're just as entitled to your opinion as I am to mine.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 07-11-2014, 08:20 AM
  #162398  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Do you SERIOUSLY think they just flat out ignored it? Or do you not want to accept that maybe you are not of a majority opinion?
Why don't you answer your own question, being that you seem to enjoy asking others on here to do the same.

Do you SERIOUSLY think the that the majority opinion on the surveys for C12k reflected a desire to forgo and give up a large portion of profit sharing and 4-8-3-3 for pay raises?

If you believe they ignored it for some black helicopter desire to screw everyone including themselves in the process, well that is a really pathetic view of those working on our behalf. And if that's truly the case, I hope you don't participate, we don't need garbage stats junking up the data.
What do you hope to accomplish by typing out the above statement and posting it?

Like it or not, with your position in the company that you have proudly identified yourself as holding, you are held to a different standard.

You are not meeting that standard.

Nor have you been lately in your other activity on this forum and others.
TheManager is offline  
Old 07-11-2014, 08:30 AM
  #162399  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Gearjerk
Good point. Disregard previous post. Pinnacle, carry on with the way you've been conducting interviews/business all along.
Yeah, but if you fail the EtD interview, you can never work at Delta mainline. Once that word gets out, who would take that chance?
Mesabah is offline  
Old 07-11-2014, 09:22 AM
  #162400  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,595
Default

I would not worry about pay banding. It's hugely over hyped on here as a massive cost savings to the company. It's actually proven out on airlines that adopted it to only have a minor overall effect on training. We essentially are very close to 4 pay bands now.
On the subject of returning to touching trips for vacation I would love that. By timing it right with 12 day trips I could drop 4 months of flying with just my primary and secondary vacations. I like it! June through September off and 3 weeks of vacation left!
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices