Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2014, 04:45 PM
  #157921  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

In all fairness, a LOT of the pilots I speak with ask for more productive trips. You have to consider what that might mean. The company probably said "OK, but NFW are we paying you 5:15 to sit around on those 30-hour layovers". Which probably led to the solution of breaking some of the trips out of rotations as SDP's.

I'm guessing that the genesis.

One important question about how ADG's might affect non SDP trips is whether it will be applied to each day, or the entire rotation. If it's day by day, the company could not afford to have us fly < 5:15 on the first and last days. Adios commutable trips.

So, since I have no language on the ADG's... Imagine a 3 day trip blocked at 4:15/6:15/4:15. Does it pay:

1) 5:15/6:15/5:15, i.e. 16:45
or
2) the greater of block or 5:15 * 3, i.e. 15:45 > 14:45, i.e. 15:45?
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 05-21-2014, 04:46 PM
  #157922  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
t-
Just my opinion and gut feeling but I don't think too many pilots will ever be forced to fly these. They are going to be bid by the senior guys and if one drops into open time it will go to a white slip. Obviously though, there will be some people who get one that didn't want it.
Time to trade in "gut feelings" and "probably", "maybe", etc with something more solid to protect those who cannot safely do CDO's and should not be penalized financially or have to do carpet dances in front of the chief pilot for turning them down when they are being forced on the schedule.
EdGrimley is offline  
Old 05-21-2014, 04:47 PM
  #157923  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

The real difficulty here will be the standard problem of politics. "Scrappy" and his team are strongly behind this TA as is Donatelli as stated in his letter. Our reps aren't just faced with the decision of voting their conscience based on our known desires. They're faced with "Scrappy", Donatelli and the rest of the MEC administrators viewing a NO vote by reps as a vote of no confidence against them. Will reps want to deliver that indirect message to the team that are set to take us into Section 6?

I've done CDO's back at NWA. I bid them because they looked so good on paper. With my first two, I got plenty of rest during the day and was unable to sleep during my six hour hotel stay. Last leg home was extremely fatiguing because of no sleep. Next I tried staying active all day so I could sleep during six hour layover. Actual sleep was only about 4 hours and I flew last leg home extremely fatigued due to fighting sleep inertia. Never bid them again.

I'm curious as to how a wrongful death attorney would pursue Delta and the pilot's estate if a CDO pilot caused a fatal car crash on the drive home. Actually, I know exactly what the wrongful death attorneys will do.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-21-2014, 04:49 PM
  #157924  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

CDO's are a no. Automatic no! But only if we get a vote!
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 05-21-2014, 04:49 PM
  #157925  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by EdGrimley
Very well said! Think back to the number of times these things end up going in the pilots favor? They end up much different than what was discussed in negotiations or even sold by the NC/MEC. The company can and will exploit these open ended, poorly written agreements on line at a time. Then we can say "didn't see that coming" and "we'll get em next time"....when the company has what they want and is no longer interested in "constructive engagement".
The reps were pretty impressive in the questions they were asking.
Those guys have done their homework.
They were well prepared to grill Scrappy about this agreement.

Everybody has their opinion about whether this agreement is good or bad but I don't think the company is sneaking anything past us.

Split-duty trips are on the table. It is a huge decision for the MEC.
But I think they are doing it with their eyes wide open.

If you don't want these split duty trips, e-mail your rep right now.
They vote tomorrow. They are reading their e-mail.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 05-21-2014, 04:51 PM
  #157926  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
The real difficulty here will be the standard problem of politics. "Scrappy" and his team are strongly behind this TA as is Donatelli as stated in his letter. Our reps aren't just faced with the decision of voting their conscience based on our known desires. They're faced with "Scrappy", Donatelli and the rest of the MEC administrators viewing a NO vote by reps as a vote of no confidence against them. Will reps want to deliver that indirect message to the team that are set to take us into Section 6?

I've done CDO's back at NWA. I bid them because they looked so good on paper. With my first two, I got plenty of rest during the day and was unable to sleep during my six hour hotel stay. Last leg home was extremely fatiguing because of no sleep. Next I tried staying active all day so I could sleep during six hour layover. Actual sleep was only about 4 hours and I flew last leg home extremely fatigued due to fighting sleep inertia. Never bid them again.

I'm curious as to how a wrongful death attorney would pursue Delta and the pilot's estate if a CDO pilot caused a fatal car crash on the drive home. Actually, I know exactly what the wrongful death attorneys will do.

Carl
Let me be the first to welcome you back.

You hit on the head my concern and why I think the SA comparison is invalid. You cannot prepare for the (essentially) IROP that could occur in one of these things. It is a bad idea.
tsquare is offline  
Old 05-21-2014, 04:54 PM
  #157927  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
So... Anyone want to discuss the merits of having open segments known 14:00 prior to report have go through PCS before the company can reroute a pilot already on a rotation?

Good or bad?
How much of an effect will it have on reroutes?
How much of an effect will it have on the WS mafia?
How much of an effect will it have on GS awards?

Dal88, we will have to agree to disagree on how "safe" a CDO is or can be and how professional our pilots handle their rest while on off duty.
Back pre117, the unwritten guideline was...if you are going to call in sick call in before the 0700 pcs run, that way your trip was available to whiteslip.

Post 117, if you were going to be sick, and called in inside of 16 hrs, the trip would go as a GS.

I don't know that anyone really did this, but it was possible.

Anyway, if the change is to 14, the company is painting itself into a corner for coverage. Imo
scambo1 is offline  
Old 05-21-2014, 04:55 PM
  #157928  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
So what I want to know is how am I going to be protected from repercussions of calling in fatigued?
Same protection given to the guys made financially whole who got PD's on their lines by following the contract.

Oh wait...

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-21-2014, 05:03 PM
  #157929  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
Default

At this point we might as well reinstate the NWA PWA and paste in the new payrates. Well need KW in CA too.
TOGA LK is offline  
Old 05-21-2014, 05:03 PM
  #157930  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,991
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
I'll assume 6 of them for 81:00.

The TA would make that same month worth 94:30 (above any LCW window)

OR

Work 2 less days and make 84:00

Looks like more money and more time off to me!!!!

Shiz,

In a world that the company was not 2 steps ahead of us that would be true and would be great. I hope you are correct, but I foresee those trips being modified to increase productivity.

If what you say comes to pass I will obviously be very happy and modify my bidding strategy.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices