Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2014, 11:34 AM
  #157661  
Line Holder
 
Quint's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Captain, SS Orca
Posts: 96
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
It would pay 10:30 under the new TA.
Or 7:30 if it's one of these CDOs?


FWIW, I did these back in my turboprop commuter days. They were awful. Always went to the reserves. As a new CA on reserve, I got 2 or 3 in a row, don't remember which. After coming in that morning, I called scheduling and told them that if they gave me another one tonight I wouldn't be doing it due to fatigue. We got in a little dust up over them saying I couldn't say I'd be fatigued 10 or 12 or however many hours it was to a potential sign-in. I said, "I appreciate what you're saying, but I'm telling you that I cannot, will-not do another one of these things tonight, period. Call whichever of my bosses you like, but I'm not doing it again."

I never heard anymore about it. Got off reserve and don't know if the "stand-ups" as we called them, stayed around.

I'll read the language, but I'm pretty shocked we are entertaining this. I am a bit confused as to why we are giving anything that could be considered a concession in our current environment. I'd just assume let it play out and file the grievance over the PDs.
Quint is offline  
Old 05-20-2014, 12:12 PM
  #157662  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
Meet our next wide body...


  • First flew March 2004
  • Seats 350 pax
  • Good cargo capacity
  • Great for hot and high SA/LA destinations
  • Airbus has seven 340-600 available right now
  • 4 for the price of 2 engine MX from Rolls
  • Virgin is parking their remaining 340-600s
  • Used prices dropping to 20-30M
  • Average price for a new 777-300 approx. $300M
  • Fuel burn only 12% more than 777-300, but 24% less than 747-400
Cheers
George
Any further rumors on this?
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 05-20-2014, 12:23 PM
  #157663  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,596
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
Any further rumors on this?
17 to 20 percent fuel burn disadvantage to other airframes. There is a reason it was a flop. Never going to happen.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-20-2014, 12:53 PM
  #157664  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
17 to 20 percent fuel burn disadvantage to other airframes. There is a reason it was a flop. Never going to happen.
At the mentioned price what's the break even in years of operation on fuel costs ? That's about an 80% saving on the cost of a large WB. That buys an awful lot of gas. I could see these as a bridge WB for lift now until RFP acft show up in force. RA made money operating the DC9 long past any other carrier. Paid for aircraft give you a lot of flexibility.
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 05-20-2014, 01:35 PM
  #157665  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
17 to 20 percent fuel burn disadvantage to other airframes. There is a reason it was a flop. Never going to happen.
We flip flops here.




Get it? See what I did? We take flops and flip them for cash flow. See Atlanta terminals A, B and C for details.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-20-2014, 02:22 PM
  #157666  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
At the mentioned price what's the break even in years of operation on fuel costs ? That's about an 80% saving on the cost of a large WB. That buys an awful lot of gas. I could see these as a bridge WB for lift now until RFP acft show up in force. RA made money operating the DC9 long past any other carrier. Paid for aircraft give you a lot of flexibility.
I've talked to several people since we flew together, no one has heard the rumor.

But, we are on the leading edge here at APC L&G

Ferd
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 05-20-2014, 02:27 PM
  #157667  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Actually in a way, yes. If they don't have anything for you by noon on your last day, you can ask to be released. If the next day is a golden day which it is 2 or 3 times a month anyway, its an automatic approval.

Perhaps there is room in there to find bargaining credits to apply to more deserving local pilots though. I'd actually almost second that resolution just to see it play out.

Since your active contempt for commuters is clouding your creative math in counting days off, let's just go nuts with it, shall we:


We have very, very few reports at 1am. Or 2am. Or 3 am. Or 4am. So the vast majority of reserves and line holders always start off with a quarter day off almost every day. With 4 blocks of work per month, that's an extra day off! I wonder if the company knows this? If we agree with this interpretation, we can reduce min days off by one for almost every pilot and still be in compliance with the contract! Don't want those pesky pilots getting free days off now, do we?

Then, since most release times occur at or before 8PM, that's another quarter day off per trip/reserve period. So we can reduce days off by 2 for most pilots. In fact, let's take every hour prior to report on day one, and every hour after release on the last day, and add up those total hours then divide that by 24 and that is the amount of extra work days we owe the company.

You still serious about this Shirley?
Pineapple has commuter issues? I've never heard that.....what ya talking about Louis
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 05-20-2014, 02:32 PM
  #157668  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
At the mentioned price what's the break even in years of operation on fuel costs ? That's about an 80% saving on the cost of a large WB. That buys an awful lot of gas. I could see these as a bridge WB for lift now until RFP acft show up in force. RA made money operating the DC9 long past any other carrier. Paid for aircraft give you a lot of flexibility.
RA said he does not like used WBs, think and remember the DC 10-30s. No, don't think so.
iceman49 is offline  
Old 05-20-2014, 02:34 PM
  #157669  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
RA said he does not like used WBs, think and remember the DC 10-30s. No, don't think so.
Good point......Debbie Downer

What have you heard about the new -300 crew rest bunk?
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 05-20-2014, 02:40 PM
  #157670  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: B-737-800
Posts: 9
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
My concern is that it sets a precedent for the company wanting more pay no credit flying. Would if they propose in mediation having pay no credit for all back side of the clock flying and justify that to the NMB by using our productivity numbers. Big loss of jobs.
I am struggling to see the problem. I know that greenslips are pay no credit. Are greenslips evil in that they distort our productivity numbers? You are a valued contributor to this forum so I thank you for your postings. Would you consider posting an example with numbers that would illuminate further your concerns?
LateFolder is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices