Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2014, 05:20 AM
  #156691  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Schwanker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
True, unless you're going into a deadhead-only duty period. Otherwise, you need at least ten hours of rest under the FARs. Even with a 30-minute report you would have more than the 8:15 or 9:00 required by the PWA.
Just spit-balling here, but maybe you get continuous duty if your following day was scheduled to start 8:15/9:00 after your actual in time plus 30. No expert, just a thought.

Last edited by Schwanker; 05-16-2014 at 05:46 AM.
Schwanker is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 05:40 AM
  #156692  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RonRicco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Captain
Posts: 830
Default

Originally Posted by index
And we'll never know how much leverage we gave away by not filing a grievance on January 1st. But then again MD would've then not been allowed to hang out with RA at the Red Sox game.
Not a rhetorical question, but you are implying that filing the grievance would have been the better option over negotiating with the threat of a grievance. How would that have created more leverage and why?

If the company would not have been negotiating in good faith etc, I would agree with you, but there was risk for both sides in the grievance process. SD's letter was way off base, but there is quite a bit of contradictory language wrt reserve and obligations. Certainly if it appeared things were not going our way, we would not have had any leverage at that point. The threat of a grievance and the implications that go with that action, may have carried more weight than filling Jan 1.

I have my doubts that I am going to like this TA, but I have no problem trying to negotiate a solution first. You feel differently and that is fine as well.
RonRicco is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 05:42 AM
  #156693  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
The communique should be out in the next day or so. No one can legally give any specifics until that is vetted. It is far from cost neutral in our favor, though.
80, I don't understand. Are you currently in possession of specific or general information as to the content of this proposed agreement?

It could be inferred from your statement that you have such information. Otherwise, why would you make such a statement?

If you are a rep, it would be inappropriate prior to the release of the agreement to be making statements regarding the content of the agreement. If you are not a rep, why would you have this information and why are you talking about it?

I attended one of the PUB events a few months ago. The reps I talked to said that the time for giving back to the Company was over. I would like to believe their statements. But then, what do I know? I'm just a line swine.
orvil is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 05:51 AM
  #156694  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TenYearsGone's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 7ERB
Posts: 2,039
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
They are great if you get one on a GS though. Did an 8:45 day last month on a GS. I like those.
That is a good idea. All days over 8 hours of flying should be paid as an automatic Greenslip I would also add nourishing crew-meals and a longer layo.

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
I can imagine. But please tell us you slowed the operation down to the point necessary to stay properly fed throughout the day.
We did not rush. Although there were no scheduled "Ms", we ate peanuts and the FAs gave us some leftovers.

On a greenslip, or after and before a long layover, or for the efficiency seeking pilot; these 8+ hr flying (Domestic) can be enticing. I, for one, think they are very draining and could be a potential issue in the future.

TEN
TenYearsGone is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 05:59 AM
  #156695  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flamer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Posts: 1,044
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Kind of hard to file a grievance on 1 May when the company has all ready agreed to pay the pilots effected and you have a agreement in principle and are working on final language.
Kind of hard to believe this when they are putting PDs on lines now. Yeah, nothing nefarious going on here.
Flamer is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 06:09 AM
  #156696  
Wind the clock beoch
 
index's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
The communique should be out in the next day or so. No one can legally give any specifics until that is vetted. It is far from cost neutral in our favor, though.
Legally? Really? What "law" would be violated and who would enforce it? An MEC Special Committee Deputy?

So it's okay for you to leak characterizations but no specifics? Without details your "info" is mere propaganda.

Are you a rep? Where are you getting your info from?
index is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 06:18 AM
  #156697  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,431
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
new-
Its just a green slip.
There's no such thing as a green slip with conflict for a reserve.
However, considering that they have to give you the violated X-days back, making you once again unavailable to the company, it functions as a pseudo green slip with conflict.

In fact I wish that a reserve GS had a different coding in the daily trip coverage than a regular line holding GS. They really are two different animals.
Herkflyr is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 06:19 AM
  #156698  
Line Holder
 
SFWB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Mecca320B
Posts: 94
Default

I'm a gut with two PD's due to acknowledging trips contractually and not SD ually. My rep today told me the loa is a plus for us. He gave no specifics. I trust him and hope they are right.
SFWB is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 06:29 AM
  #156699  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by index
Your conclusory opinion is not grounded in the law or fact. You can speculate what a court might do but to say definitively what they would do is naive and irresponsible.
Originally Posted by index
Reading comprehension doesn't appear to be one of your strengths. I didn't say they couldn't file in NYC, I stated where they WOULD file based on their past history. You should read up on venue.


It's funny how in one post you can chastise me in one post for posting a conclusory opinion, but yet you have no problem doing the exact same thing in your response.

Consistency doesn't appear to be one of your strengths.

Thanks for you attempted lesson on venue. Where did you learn it?
newKnow is offline  
Old 05-16-2014, 06:37 AM
  #156700  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: No to large RJs
Posts: 369
Default

Originally Posted by TenYearsGone

On the other hand, I wish there were a way to ban these over 8 hour domestic days. I am beat. The efficiency might be good, but it makes for a real tiring day especially following a short layover, no crew meals and quick turn. I, for one, will never ever bid for this type trip again

TEN
+1

One other thing I think would decrease safety is CDO, stand ups, high speeds etc. I bring this up because my gut says we gave this away. Guys don't get the rest needed before doing these type of trips, whether they like them or not. "Some guys like them" is the response I received when talking to my reps about it = most likely done deal. We shall see but my experience with them is usually unsafe. You count on rest that you may or may not get. People who choose to fly them want to maximize their time (side business, other obligations etc.) show up already tired from a days work counting on at least 6 hrs behind the door that may not happen. When it doesn't happen, it is usually due to wx, mtc, creating more fatigue. In this situation you are legal but a walking zombie.
DAWGS is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices