Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,739
Does anyone think that the flow ups were a management experiment to see whether or not they could feed main line when military applicants got skinny. Yes, no.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: The Parlor
Posts: 1,247
No, I believe NWA ALPA wanted it for the Flow Down language in the event of a furlough. Since it was a part of the BK contract that was what they negotiate for the scope relief.
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
I'm with T on this...I just listened to a bevy DAL leaders speak on different aspects of where DAL is going. One of the nuggets I took away was that the 777 doesn't seem to fit anywhere in DAL's future route network. Said another way, the "powers that be" like right sizing a/c to range and capabilities...the 777 doesn't seem to be doing anything another fleet or a/c type could be doing now....ie 330's.
JMHO
JMHO
The big Airbus is quite a bit cheaper and holds more people. Shorter range, less cargo, but as I said, there just are not too many destinations in Delta's network that require 777 range.
They are now reconfiguring the 777's to eliminate 8 lie flat seats and add 22 Economy Comfort seats, for a total capacity of 291 pax.
The 777-300ER is supposed to haul more cargo than a 747, but they are very expensive and Delta got out of the cargo business a long time ago.
No money in cargo, anyway.
GF
GF
There seems to be or soon will be much more shuffling of fleets on routes, not only seasonally but possibly days of the week.
I don't understand why every big European airline can fly 777's and 747's (or A380's) to Europe. But it's not in our DNA.
Thanks Ex-Im bank, U.S. Government, and Boeing.
This is also a major reason while we will see a 330 before a 777, a 350 before a 787, etc, etc.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post