Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,000
George is a pretty solid poster with a great track record, but nothing wrong with being skeptical. Believing it when you see it is always a good policy.
Scoop
What would your opinion be of biting off on a common category with the 330 to streamline the acquisition and training costs to quickly get close to 20 additional WB's in the fleet and the benefit to the pilot group?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
You give me way too much credit, they aren't my numbers, but you knew that...
Maybe we can, just for you T, keep this slogan on the tail of one of them:
;-)
G
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Reference comments made in a certain published notes about bridge aircraft. Common type with 330, very short differences course for current 330 pilots if flown as common category, TVM of a cheap acquisition for short term (<10 yrs) makes up for a lot of other factors, and excellent metrics for long haul capacity. 840K MTOW, 375 dual class, 7900nm range for damn near free? That buys a lot of gas and creates a lot of revenue and the aircraft are still very comfy and would sync with other Airbus WB customer premium expectations easily. Recall RA is very fond of used proven airframes at bargain prices. We need added long haul capacity yesterday.
Bridge aircraft to get to the next gen aircraft in the pipeline without being the guinea pig.
Not to mention this is a networks guy's wet dream to have a small, medium and large like-type available to sharpshoot capacity...
ah never mind...it's not a Boeing ;-)
Cheers
George
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,242
I did "bounces" down at the Airbus facility in Miami once, and their sim was both. It was just a quick few minutes for the MX guys to swap out 2 for 4 thrust levers and away ya went.
Sounds like it would be an easy transition.......BUT WHEREZ THE BUNK????
Sounds like it would be an easy transition.......BUT WHEREZ THE BUNK????
Check your time card, lots of people are having trips disappear. scheduling is well aware of the issue, been fielding calls all day they said.
Reference comments made in a certain published notes about bridge aircraft. Common type with 330, very short differences course for current 330 pilots if flown as common category, TVM of a cheap acquisition for short term (<10 yrs) makes up for a lot of other factors, and excellent metrics for long haul capacity. 840K MTOW, 375 dual class, 7900nm range for damn near free? That buys a lot of gas and creates a lot of revenue and the aircraft are still very comfy and would sync with other Airbus WB customer premium expectations easily. Recall RA is very fond of used proven airframes at bargain prices. We need added long haul capacity yesterday.
What would your opinion be of biting off on a common category with the 330 to streamline the acquisition and training costs to quickly get close to 20 additional WB's in the fleet and the benefit to the pilot group?
What would your opinion be of biting off on a common category with the 330 to streamline the acquisition and training costs to quickly get close to 20 additional WB's in the fleet and the benefit to the pilot group?
Still, it's like that time in between buying a lottery ticket and when they announce the numbers. I can fantasize about the future.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post