Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2014, 06:57 AM
  #154281  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RonRicco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Captain
Posts: 830
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
If we win long call would exist only on a strictly volunteer basis. The company lawyers feel they have grounds to prevail. I don't feel that is the case but there is a chance they could win. Call your reps for details.
And I have been around long enough to know that because something appears to be a slam dunk, it doesn't mean it will turn out that way. One only has to look back at a couple of our vacation grievances, AA's hard clad language with regard to their seniority list vs American Eagle flying as examples.

It seems like a lot of the neutrals tend to avoid extreme decisions in cases like these and I could see him splitting the baby somehow. An example would be the furlough grievance. Yes, they had to recall but only 10 a month.
RonRicco is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 07:08 AM
  #154282  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
This is starting to sound like a case of "be careful what you ask for". If what you say is true, then our reserve will be like American's, meaning all reserves are on short call. That sucks. period.



Who would then be the "volunteer"? The pilot, or the company?
We have a limit of 6 or 7 shortcalls a month. That would not change. Once a reserve was out in the system however I would expect the company would keep him out there via reroutes for a long time.

The pilot would have to acknowledge a long call assignment 10 hours prior to be legal for the trip. That would be voluntary per the contract.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 07:18 AM
  #154283  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
. Once a reserve was out in the system however I would expect the company would keep him out there via reroutes for a long time.
I bet the company is gunning hard to increase the 3 days minimum on-call period in domestic categories, for exactly this reason.

If the company wants to run reserves via reroute, It would certainly be cumbersome for crew tracking to ensure a domestic guy stays out of his base to avoid having to release him...
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 07:31 AM
  #154284  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by SierraWhiskey
Stupid question for those of you with higher math skills! Do you audit your pay stubs? If so, can you explain to me what I'm missing when I add up my (Pretax Ins & 401K + Taxes + Deductions) - (Gross Earnings) = Does not equal my direct deposit. What am I missing? Thanks in advance.
LIFETXVAL = imputed income for company paid life insurance.

I don't think that's included in Gross Earnings, so it throws off the math.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 07:40 AM
  #154285  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
We have a limit of 6 or 7 shortcalls a month. That would not change. Once a reserve was out in the system however I would expect the company would keep him out there via reroutes for a long time.

The pilot would have to acknowledge a long call assignment 10 hours prior to be legal for the trip. That would be voluntary per the contract.
Interesting. So if a pilot does NOT acknowledge a trip, he is not legal for it. Why would any LC reserve ever acknowledge any trip then? If this is about not being called within the 10 hours prior, it seems as if LC reserve is a license to sit home and do nothing, while watching the SC reserves get rerouted. The only problem there is that you cannot be rerouted infdefinitely, so the net result would be a need for vastly more reserves, and keeping as many as possible on SC. It's a math problem at this point. This will have a lot of value in an upcoming section 6 I would think....

To be truthful, I don't think this is going to have a good outcome. I still think we should be careful for what we are asking.....
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 07:52 AM
  #154286  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank

If the company wants to run reserves via reroute, It would certainly be cumbersome for crew tracking to ensure a domestic guy stays out of his base to avoid having to release him...
Depends on the base. In NY, we never go back thru until the end of the trip. (in the ER category anyway) But for most of the NB categories especially in ATL/DTW, you are probably right.
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 07:56 AM
  #154287  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: 7ERB
Posts: 80
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
LIFETXVAL = imputed income for company paid life insurance.

I don't think that's included in Gross Earnings, so it throws off the math.

That was it...Thank you.
SierraWhiskey is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 08:11 AM
  #154288  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
This is starting to sound like a case of "be careful what you ask for". If what you say is true, then our reserve will be like American's, meaning all reserves are on short call. That sucks. period.



Who would then be the "volunteer"? The pilot, or the company?
I'm missing something and would like to catch up to the conversation.
Why do you say all reserves would be on short call?
newKnow is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 08:18 AM
  #154289  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Depends on the base. In NY, we never go back thru until the end of the trip. (in the ER category anyway) But for most of the NB categories especially in ATL/DTW, you are probably right.
We've got a lovely trip now where on day 2 we fly BOS-JFK-SFO, for 8:03 flight time.

When you level off at cruise on the second leg and see that you still have 5 plus hours to go, you think to yourself, "I sure am glad we did that BOS-JFK flight." (No. Not really.)
newKnow is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 08:21 AM
  #154290  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
I'm missing something and would like to catch up to the conversation.
Why do you say all reserves would be on short call?
Sailing was saying that long call would be "voluntary" if we win this negotiation/grievance. I'll go out on a limb and say that I am pretty sure the company wouldn't want that. OK.. he says that we are only allowed 6/7 SCs/month. I would think you could pretty much count on 7 if this goes thru as he is saying. The company would then want more in the next contract, or we would have to provide some methodology to ensure that LC reserve is not "voluntary". At this point, I do not know enough about the intricacies about this, but it seems that sans relief on the "voluntary" aspect of this, we are gonna see lots more SCs....
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices