Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2014, 06:20 PM
  #153271  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge

If you have constructive criticism, or are actively participating to make it better, then I think we all welcome your input. However, your generalizing/disparaging other Delta pilots continuously shows a lack of class.
I can understand how my post could be taken as a slight against individual volunteers giving their time with no monetary compensation, and that was not my intent.

My intent was to bash the institutional inertia that seeks primarily to protect, grow, and insulate the bureaucracy; and to call out the paid, non-elected (and often, non-flying) functionaries that, whether intentionally or not, place the health of the bureaucracy ahead of Delta line pilots' best interests.

We both know what I'm talking about.

As for some "constructive criticism," well, as GG and schwanker said: publish some concrete, definable goals. And as many, many of us have said: release the survey results. Show some leadership; embrace the chance to display accountability; make a meaningful, concerted effort to earn back badly shaken trust.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 06:20 PM
  #153272  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Elliot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: "Prof" button manipulator
Posts: 1,685
Default

Originally Posted by Gearjerk
When's the DPA vote? There's a better alternative.
How did his post in any way suggest the DPA as a better alternative?
Where in my post did I suggest he was stating the DPA was a better alternative?

Read what Leine wrote. People are sick of his insults & wise-cracks from the sidelines.
Elliot is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 06:26 PM
  #153273  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by Schwanker
This is exactly what I would like to see. Clear and measurable goals so we can provide feedback if we like/don't like what we are going for and also to measure the success, or lack there of, of the results.

Sample goals:
6 weeks vacation at 20 years, 5 weeks at 15....
Vacation day pays adg
Training pays adg
1:1 on distance learning
ZERO more jets to DCI
Pay, 401k, adg.... Give us targets for all and let us determine the level of success.
Sounds so simple, eh?

You are encouraged to employ Google and read up on the National Mediation Board, the Railway Labor Act, the procedures and the methods used to negotiate our contract.

Also, I would point out that C2012 actually met or exceeded your stated goals in every area, but one.

As you read up on the legal environment we must operate under, you will come to the realization that stating objective goals in public as you suggest could be very counter productive to reaching those goals. In the most simple terms the process of mediation implies meeting in the middle. If you state your goals you've actually just set your ceiling. Management will then rest the floor lower ... when they meet you "half way" then you've lost. ... and Purple Drank would constantly remind you how you fell short.

Sounds simple, but publishing is a really lousy strategy. We can get into this in greater depth if you want, but off the cuff:
  • Sets a ceiling over pilots
  • Mid point can be reset lower by management
  • Sets expectations by membership
  • NMB might find bad faith for refusal to negotiate from your published goals
  • Pilots likely to argue over published goals (think the goals are too much X and not enough Y)
  • Goals may need to change as a result of an external factor (FAR117 for instance)

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 04-05-2014 at 06:36 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 06:27 PM
  #153274  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Schwanker
This is exactly what I would like to see. Clear and measurable goals so we can provide feedback if we like/don't like what we are going for and also to measure the success, or lack there of, of the results.

Sample goals:
6 weeks vacation at 20 years, 5 weeks at 15....
Vacation day pays adg
Training pays adg
1:1 on distance learning
ZERO more jets to DCI
Pay, 401k, adg.... Give us targets for all and let us determine the level of success.
That would be like showing your hand at poker, or some BS like that.

You are never going to see measureable goals from our union. Only they can lose with them.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 06:35 PM
  #153275  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
I can understand how my post could be taken as a slight against individual volunteers giving their time with no monetary compensation, and that was not my intent.

My intent was to bash the institutional inertia that seeks primarily to protect, grow, and insulate the bureaucracy; and to call out the paid, non-elected (and often, non-flying) functionaries that, whether intentionally or not, place the health of the bureaucracy ahead of Delta line pilots' best interests.

We both know what I'm talking about.
Purple,

You are encouraged to attend a training PUB event, or even better the Atlanta N PUB at the 57th Fighter Group on 3 May at 14:00. You might have a different perspective if you listened to and engaged our MEC's Admin and Leadership. You might gain some insight as to the depth of knowledge and experience some of these pilots have.

Your "bureaucratic inertia" is another person's "jesh, we negotiated >8% more than our peers when we did Contract 2012 ... lets stick with what works." Is it enough? Will it ever be enough? We will always want and try to get, more.

I'm going to try and refrain from insulting you in the fashion that you insult so many who work for you. Rather, you are encouraged to learn, even gain experience if you want to pitch in and help.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 06:40 PM
  #153276  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Purple,

You are encouraged to attend a training PUB event, or even better the Atlanta N PUB at the 57th Fighter Group on 3 May at 14:00. You might have a different perspective if you listened to and engaged our MEC's Admin and Leadership. You might gain some insight as to the depth of knowledge and experience some of these pilots have.
I attend LEC meetings regularly.

The company's making record profits. We managed to negotiate a "bankruptcy plus" contract...after giving up work rules to get the "plus."

I'm sure I'd be impressed by "depth of knowledge and experience some of these pilots have." I'd be more impressed with some results.

Let's start with 117 negotiations.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 06:42 PM
  #153277  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Are you OK with no goals and no survey results (and thus, no accountability) from DALPA?
Not at all, and I see us as having both.

As I understand it, the goals of our MEC are, "To engage anywhere necessary to address opportunities and threats; always protecting and advancing Delta pilot careers, pay, working conditions, benefits and job security."

Accountability is ever-present in the fact that our reps are up for re-election every three years and that they appear before us at least every quarter at LEC meetings to report on their activities and to take our input and our criticism.
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 06:45 PM
  #153278  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
You need to use a spoon not a fork.
Reminds me of ...



Jump to 1:30

When you are getting your Chunky Monkey on, she likes to spoon, but I wanna fork.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 06:46 PM
  #153279  
Gets Weekends Off
 
poostain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 351
Default Vacation-Res day-X day question again

How do we figure how many Reserve days we are on the hook for in a vacation month? Example 14 days vacation= _?_ reserve days owed.
poostain is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 06:48 PM
  #153280  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
We managed to negotiate a "bankruptcy plus" contract...after giving up work rules to get the "plus."
That would be bankruptcy plus about 50%. And we'll have to disagree about whether we gave up work rules, given that reserve guarantee went up by an average of 4.6 hours along with days off, vacation and CQ training pay went up, we got "blockholder without a block guarantee back."

Granted a reserve pilot who is not full may be assigned flying up to ALV +15, but he is now full as the same or a lower point. Are you saying there is more that we gave up?
Alan Shore is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices