Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2014, 07:54 PM
  #151381  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DogWhisperer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: MD-88 F/O
Posts: 1,004
Default

This from the "For those of you looking for an interesting read" column…just finished a good book about the NWA loss of flight #4422 DC-4 on Mount Sanford, Alaska. The book is written by one of our own and involves the decade long search and discovery of an over 50 year mystery. Its a great testament to the brotherhood of aviation.



DogWhisperer is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 07:58 PM
  #151382  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
16 744s, 58 763s, 74 total. I hope the "replacement" is 74 or more. Hate to use 50 to replace 74 WBs of which 16 are the highest paying.



So there is the rub. You have a min/max range to be profitable with bigfoot and the whale. In laymen pilot speak the way I understand this is we are doing margin management on the WBs and that is why we are a devout 767-300 airline with a sprinkling of heavies for long range stuff. We are about to become an A330 airline, which can go far as that stunt last year proved.



So are we about to start the long goodbye with the 757/767? I guess it's inevitable.



A350. Looks cool.



So... if the 330 is for Europe, Africa, Left Coast - Asia and Intra-Asia, what goes from NYC/ATL/DTW to Asia where the $$$ seems to be?



Dammit Boeing and your 737 fixation.



Dammit Boeing. You had the 717! Instead of killing it, you could have used it to push away Embraer and Bombardier. But oh no, buy our 737 instead.



DC-9-50 = WINNER. 717-300 = WINNER. Just saying.
That's a pretty big shot across the bow at Boeing and Airbus. The 359 is a big plane... 777 size. The 330 is almost a 777 size plane, but much lighter and doesn't carry the gas to go twice around the world, hold over ODF for another couple hours, and only then divert to Nashville.

I need to fistbump RA next time for in so many words saying "we've done all we can do with the 737, come up with something new that can actually replace the 757."

Boeing is such a misguided company....
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 08:04 PM
  #151383  
veut gagner ŕ la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Where did the early retirements come off of? I assume they had already taken effect before that window?
They'd taken effect before that window. That was March 2013 vs 2014, I thought the few (191 out of 10500) early retirement guys were required to be gone in 2012? I can't get 2012 numbers. I never saved those.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 08:14 PM
  #151384  
veut gagner ŕ la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
That's a pretty big shot across the bow at Boeing and Airbus. The 359 is a big plane... 777 size. The 330 is almost a 777 size plane, but much lighter and doesn't carry the gas to go twice around the world, hold over ODF for another couple hours, and only then divert to Nashville.

I need to fistbump RA next time for in so many words saying "we've done all we can do with the 737, come up with something new that can actually replace the 757."

Boeing is such a misguided company....
There's hope. If Techops can reverse engineer an aft strut fairing on the 767, why not reverse engineer the 757 and 717?

forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 08:39 PM
  #151385  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
They'd taken effect before that window. That was March 2013 vs 2014, I thought the few (191 out of 10500) early retirement guys were required to be gone in 2012? I can't get 2012 numbers. I never saved those.
Thats what I thought as well, which would mean that there is more of an overall loss in large WB positions.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 08:43 PM
  #151386  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid


Think of the cost savings from using the same engines, same overhead, same type ratings, same gear, same brakes, same tail skids and all of the savings from never having to develop a 2L door!
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 09:13 PM
  #151387  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

I posted this in the safety forum, but some rather interesting facts have just been released.... the 777 kept talking to Boeing and reporting engine data for another 4ish hours!


From the WSJ: U.S. Investigators Suspect Missing Airplane Flew On for Hours - WSJ.com


U.S. investigators suspect that Malaysia Airlines 3786.KU -2.04% Flight 370 stayed in the air for about four hours past the time it reached its last confirmed location, according to two people familiar with the details, raising the possibility that the plane could have flown on for hundreds of additional miles under conditions that remain murky.
Aviation investigators and national security officials believe the plane flew for a total of five hours based on data automatically downloaded and sent to the ground from the Boeing Co. BA -0.99% 777's engines as part of a routine maintenance and monitoring program.
That raises a host of new questions and possibilities about what happened aboard the widebody jet carrying 239 people, which vanished from civilian air-traffic control radar over the weekend, about one hour into a flight to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur.

That raises a host of new questions and possibilities about what happened aboard the widebody jet carrying 239 people, which vanished from civilian air-traffic control radar over the weekend, about one hour into a flight to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur.
Six days after the mysterious disappearance prompted a massive international air and water search that so far hasn't produced any results, the investigation appears to be broadening in scope.
U.S. counterterrorism officials are pursuing the possibility that a pilot or someone else on board the plane may have diverted it toward an undisclosed location after intentionally turning off the jetliner's transponders to avoid radar detection, according to one person tracking the probe.

The investigation remains fluid, and it isn't clear whether investigators have evidence indicating possible terrorism or espionage. So far, U.S. national security officials have said that nothing specifically points toward terrorism, though they haven't ruled it out.
But the huge uncertainty about where the plane was headed, and why it apparently continued flying so long without working transponders, has raised theories among investigators that the aircraft may have been commandeered for a reason that appears unclear to U.S. authorities. Some of those theories have been laid out to national security officials and senior personnel from various U.S. agencies, according to one person familiar with the matter.
At one briefing, according to this person, officials were told investigators are actively pursuing the notion that the plane was diverted "with the intention of using it later for another purpose."
As of Wednesday it remained unclear whether the plane reached an alternate destination or if it ultimately crashed, potentially hundreds of miles from where an international search effort has been focused.
The engines' onboard monitoring system is provided by their manufacturer, Rolls-Royce RR.LN -1.71% PLC, and it periodically sends bursts of data about engine health, operations and aircraft movements to facilities on the ground.
Rolls-Royce couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
As part of its maintenance agreements, Malaysia Airlines transmits its engine data live to Rolls-Royce for analysis. The system compiles data from inside the 777's two Trent 800 engines and transmits snapshots of performance, as well as the altitude and speed of the jet.

Those snippets are compiled and transmitted in 30-minute increments, said one person familiar with the system. According to Rolls-Royce's website, the data is processed automatically "so that subtle changes in condition from one flight to another can be detected."
The engine data is being analyzed to help determine the flight path of the plane after the transponders stopped working. The jet was originally headed for China, and its last verified position was half way across the Gulf of Thailand.
A total flight time of five hours after departing Kuala Lumpur means the Boeing 777 could have continued for an additional distance of about 2,200 nautical miles, reaching points as far as the Indian Ocean, the border of Pakistan or even the Arabian Sea, based on the jet's cruising speed.

Last edited by 80ktsClamp; 03-12-2014 at 11:06 PM. Reason: jacked up article quote. fixed!
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 09:17 PM
  #151388  
veut gagner ŕ la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Thats what I thought as well, which would mean that there is more of an overall loss in large WB positions.
Good point. I'd really like to see the March 2012 lines awarded numbers.

I did find that ATL777A had projected 200 As in it as of December 2008. It has 177 flying it now.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 03-12-2014 at 09:33 PM.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 09:19 PM
  #151389  
veut gagner ŕ la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I posted this in the safety forum, but some rather interesting facts have just been released.... the 777 kept talking to Boeing and reporting engine data for another 4ish hours!


From the WSJ: U.S. Investigators Suspect Missing Airplane Flew On for Hours - WSJ.com


U.S. investigators suspect that Malaysia Airlines 3786.KU -2.04% Flight 370 stayed in the air for about four hours past the time it reached its last confirmed location, according to two people familiar with the details, raising the possibility that the plane could have flown on for hundreds of additional miles under conditions that remain murky.
Aviation investigators and national security officials believe the plane flew for a total of five hours based on data automatically downloaded and sent to the ground from the Boeing Co. BA -0.99% 777's engines as part of a routine maintenance and monitoring program.
That raises a host of new questions and possibilities about what happened aboard the widebody jet carrying 239 people, which vanished from civilian air-traffic control radar over the weekend, about one hour into a flight to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur.

That raises a host of new questions and possibilities about what happened aboard the widebody jet carrying 239 people, which vanished from civilian air-traffic control radar over the weekend, about one hour into a flight to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur.
Six days after the mysterious disappearance prompted a massive international air and water search that so far hasn't produced any results, the investigation appears to be broadening in scope.
U.S. counterterrorism officials are pursuing the possibility that a pilot or someone else on board the plane may have diverted it toward an undisclosed location after intentionally turning off the jetliner's transponders to avoid radar detection, according to one person tracking the probe.

The investigation remains fluid, and it isn't clear whether investigators have evidence indicating possible terrorism or espionage. So far, U.S. national security officials have said that nothing specifically points toward terrorism, though they haven't ruled it out.
But the huge uncertainty about where the plane was headed, and why it apparently continued flying so long without working transponders, has raised theories among investigators that the aircraft may have been commandeered for a reason that appears unclear to U.S. authorities. Some of those theories have been laid out to national security officials and senior personnel from various U.S. agencies, according to one person familiar with the matter.
At one briefing, according to this person, officials were told investigators are actively pursuing the notion that the plane was diverted "with the intention of using it later for another purpose."
As of Wednesday it remained unclear whether the plane reached an alternate destination or if it ultimately crashed, potentially hundreds of miles from where an international search effort has been focused.
The engines' onboard monitoring system is provided by their manufacturer, Rolls-Royce RR.LN -1.71% PLC, and it periodically sends bursts of data about engine health, operations and aircraft movements to facilities on the ground.
Rolls-Royce couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
As part of its maintenance agreements, Malaysia Airlines transmits its engine data live to Rolls-Royce for analysis. The system compiles data from inside the 777's two Trent 800 engines and transmits snapshots of performance, as well as the altitude and speed of the jet.

Those snippets are compiled and transmitted in 30-minute increments, said one person familiar with the system. According to Rolls-Royce's website, the data is processed automatically "so that subtle changes in condition from one flight to another can be detected."
The engine data is being analyzed to help determine the flight path of the plane after the transponders stopped working. The jet was originally headed for China, and its last verified position was half way across the Gulf of Thailand.
A total flight time of five hours after departing Kuala Lumpur means the Boeing 777 could have continued for an additional distance of about 2,200 nautical miles, reaching points as far as the Indian Ocean, the border of Pakistan or even the Arabian Sea, based on the jet's cruising speed.


The behind the scenes of what's going on has to be incredible.

Last edited by 80ktsClamp; 03-12-2014 at 11:05 PM. Reason: I dorked up the initial article quote...
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 10:45 PM
  #151390  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Pi x r^2 = 3.14 x (2,200 x 2,200) mi = 15,197,600 square miles. That's the search area for the aircraft. yeeeaaahhh good luck with that.....
Mesabah is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices