Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2014, 05:29 PM
  #151361  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I stated that 56 747/777 bids were posted as replacements for retiring pilots after it was posted that none were replaced. More then 56 retired in the ER program. Please tell where the numbers wreak. They are straight from crew planning and I checked them against the bids I could still locate. Please show me your data that causes these numbers to wreak?
I'll concede, you are correct on the 56 number directly post 2012. I had forgotten about the ER and the initial replacements. However the proof is in the pudding as far as the wording of your post right htere. It's rapidly approaching 2 years since the last vacancy, and they did not replace the all 744/777 guys that took the ER in the first place. We are also a year and a half down range from Age 65 day, and not a single replacement for the the "real" retirements yet either.

While you are technically correct, the overall sentiment is also correct in regard to virtually no replacements since C2012. How much longer will it be with real retirements and no replacements for the 744 and 777?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 05:32 PM
  #151362  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
AE date DC9 717 M88 320 73N 767 7ER 765 330 777 747 Total A
Aug12 26 10 10 20 66
Oct12 4 20 10 -20 25 8 8 55
Mar13 -116 145 -16 -8 80 -80 87 -29 9 11 83
Jun13 55 22 77
Sep13 35 25 5 10 75
Oct13 25 25
Dec13 35 45 7 87
Jan14 15 15 18 4 52
Feb14 5 5 10
Total -112 195 149 84 151 -100 122 4 -19 17 39 503


Ok, I give up trying to post the numbers in a readable format on here. I thought I had it and it did not post correctly again. I will be happy to send the data to anyone who can post it correctly.
Take a screen shot of it, cut it down to size in paint. Then you can upload it to tinypic and post it here via normal IMG posting procedures.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 05:36 PM
  #151363  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 402
Default

The "experts" are saying the debris in the satellite photos is way to big...CNN is running this basically nonstop
Very quiet on here about the whole thing.......

Last edited by p3flteng; 03-12-2014 at 05:38 PM. Reason: cell phone auto correct
p3flteng is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 05:48 PM
  #151364  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by p3flteng
The "experts" are saying the debris in the satellite photos is way to big...CNN is running this basically nonstop.

Very quite on here about the whole thing.......
They were also saying that it was in the correct place and on course from the last position (which was the FIR into vietnam... No one has mentioned how long the transponder was on in their airspace, which is supposed to be VHF radar control via all the pilots familiar that I've talked with.) This debris is almost 90 degrees off course and 100 miles away from the last "fix."
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 05:53 PM
  #151365  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,576
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I'll concede, you are correct on the 56 number directly post 2012. I had forgotten about the ER and the initial replacements. However the proof is in the pudding as far as the wording of your post right htere. It's rapidly approaching 2 years since the last vacancy, and they did not replace the all 744/777 guys that took the ER in the first place. We are also a year and a half down range from Age 65 day, and not a single replacement for the the "real" retirements yet either.

While you are technically correct, the overall sentiment is also correct in regard to virtually no replacements since C2012. How much longer will it be with real retirements and no replacements for the 744 and 777?
I must be missing your point. I posted what has happened sine the contract was signed. There is zero overall job loss. Yes there were categories that were overmanned and have shrunk. Overall however that is not the case. We even went up in 767/7er captains despite parking airframes. Timbo knows why the 777 has shrunk in ATL. Marketing shifts flying all the time. The 330 as a example was once planned to do a lot more over 12 hour flying and staffed for it. The flying never came and the numbers have gone down. We are up a significant number of Captains at Delta. If there had been even modest job loss in the new contract let alone massive job loss that would not be the case.
sailingfun is online now  
Old 03-12-2014, 05:54 PM
  #151366  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: C560XL/XLS/XLS+
Posts: 1,278
Default

Originally Posted by p3flteng
The "experts" are saying the debris in the satellite photos is way to big...CNN is running this basically nonstop
Very quiet on here about the whole thing.......
A reality version of "Lost"? Amazing they can't locate an ELT.
dalad is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 06:08 PM
  #151367  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I'll concede, you are correct on the 56 number directly post 2012. I had forgotten about the ER and the initial replacements. However the proof is in the pudding as far as the wording of your post right htere. It's rapidly approaching 2 years since the last vacancy, and they did not replace the all 744/777 guys that took the ER in the first place. We are also a year and a half down range from Age 65 day, and not a single replacement for the the "real" retirements yet either.

While you are technically correct, the overall sentiment is also correct in regard to virtually no replacements since C2012. How much longer will it be with real retirements and no replacements for the 744 and 777?
Thanks for explaining my point much more clearly 80K. I know we are retiring pilots off the 777, yet it's been a couple years since I've seen an A/E with 777 Capt. positions on it. There has been a shift of positions from ATL up to DTW, but as you pointed out, combined positions in DTW and ATL the 777 Capt. category is -9 since 2012.

So, as I said a few pages ago, if you want to be a 717 or 737 Capt, rock on.

But if you want to be a Super Premium Capt, not so much.
Timbo is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 06:12 PM
  #151368  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I must be missing your point. I posted what has happened sine the contract was signed. There is zero overall job loss. Yes there were categories that were overmanned and have shrunk. Overall however that is not the case. We even went up in 767/7er captains despite parking airframes. Timbo knows why the 777 has shrunk in ATL. Marketing shifts flying all the time. The 330 as a example was once planned to do a lot more over 12 hour flying and staffed for it. The flying never came and the numbers have gone down. We are up a significant number of Captains at Delta. If there had been even modest job loss in the new contract let alone massive job loss that would not be the case.
So not only are we down 777 Capts. since 2012, but we are down A330 Capt.s too? We may be up a significant number of Captains, but they are not in the highest paying seats. In effect, we are downsizing to more narrow body Captains, with less Super Premium Captains.
Timbo is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 06:20 PM
  #151369  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,576
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
So not only are we down 777 Capts. since 2012, but we are down A330 Capt.s too? We may be up a significant number of Captains, but they are not in the highest paying seats. In effect, we are downsizing to more narrow body Captains, with less Super Premium Captains.
We are not down Captains because of the contract so again I don't get the point. Perhaps you should talk to RA and the marketing department. ATL-BOM alone was 25 plus captains jobs not counting reserves.
sailingfun is online now  
Old 03-12-2014, 06:26 PM
  #151370  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinca3's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Default

Why can't we have such trivial problems?
Mini-skirt turbulence at Japan budget airline
sinca3 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices