Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2014, 08:44 AM
  #150751  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
It's unfortunately true. Delta hiring is finding out what make up the seniors there which is likely similar to other regionals. They are mostly stuck there for a reason with of course a few exceptions. The liability involved would be interesting to see given how bad so many have blown the screening yet go back to fly delta pax.
I don't think there's any liability. Even a rookie HR dept at an upstart knows how to layer their interview process with more than enough plausable deniability for a million reasons. And DL's HR dept is no rookie. Unless they start stamping "UNSAFE TO FLY DELTA PASSENGERS" in red block letters on their application and then save it for audit, they have nothing to worry about.

Who, pilot John Doe? Well our records, backed up by Federal qualification standards, show he was fully qualified. He just didn't meet all of our personality requirements at the time. Perhaps he didn't know enough DL logo history, or his shoes weren't shined enough. We were still going to hire him, but he wore a blue tie to the interview, so...
gloopy is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 08:58 AM
  #150752  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
BB, I agree with much of what you strive for, but this is one of the reasons I am NOT in favor of bringing their whole list onto our list. I've heard the initial SSP guys have a roughly 50% acceptance rate. I don't want to sound harsh, but I don't want someone in my right seat that Delta doesn't also want there.
I see nothing to gain by magically annointing another seniority list with DL numbers. Particularly if it involves DL numbers and longevity while still at their regional, maybe even for years, as that would involve a very steep price to pay for virtually zero gain. Unless the actual aircraft are transferred to our list as well, with a corresponding reduction in large allowable AC to be outsourced, simply putting more pilots on to our list south of our scope line without moving the scope line the same distance south does nothing other than try and trick the company into hiring top scale new hires which they're not going to do.

This is a mainline scope problem with a mainline scope solution. Reduce the allowable airframes to be outsourced and operate them here, with new hires at the bottom of the list. Simply gifting seniority numbers to regional pilot groups and/or placing them into our MEC does nothing whatsoever to change the fact that the airframes they fly are outside our scope line. CPZ being in the DL MEC was rediculous. The planes were still outsourced for incredibly low pay and benefits, they still had a separate contract and extremely limited leverage with a fairly weak long term contract. The only "link" was the flow, which was preserved either way anyway. If they were still part of the MEC, all that would do long term would be to set up DALPA for a DFR.

Even though CPZ would make the most sense of the bunch, the concept just doesn't work or do anything to reduce outsourcing or its negative effects. It doesn't bring the flying to this side of the line at all. Not by a single jet. And even if we re-annointed CPZ and somehow made it work, what about all the other "DCI" carriers…most (if not all by now) who fly for other legacy airlines as well. So regionals with numtipile seniority numbers at multipile carriers? Not going to work.
gloopy is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 09:20 AM
  #150753  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,529
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
The drone technology makes single pilot feasible in the next decade...
Feasible, but far from cost-effective.
Boomer is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 09:31 AM
  #150754  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: C560XL/XLS/XLS+
Posts: 1,278
Default

We have a new Negotiating Committee Chairman. Good man for the job, IMO.
dalad is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 09:31 AM
  #150755  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,529
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
see, age 65 elimination > MPL... and simpler... and if you make it retroactive it solves a lot of shortage problems at the regionals. problem solved.

did i mention that doing that is also free?
Eliminating age 65 would not solve the regional pilot shortage. On the contrary, many of us in our 30s/40s will look at the stagnation of the last 10 years and decide it's not worth sticking around if "paying our dues" means another ten years in the minor league.

A lot of us stuck it out by telling ourselves (and our families) "It's only five years and then the majors will be hiring again"

Many of us could replace our regional pay tomorrow, but haven't bailed because we still want a possible career at the majors. Take that away and watch a thousand regional pilots turn in their two-week notice.
Boomer is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 09:58 AM
  #150756  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TeddyKGB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: 7er
Posts: 1,673
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
100% of the crazies that I know by name interviewed got the down. Meanwhile nothing but good guys have gotten the ok.
Couldn't be more wrong 80.
TeddyKGB is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 10:20 AM
  #150757  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Alan Shore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Default

Originally Posted by dalad
We have a new Negotiating Committee Chairman. Good man for the job, IMO.
Yes, he was quite effective as Contract Administration Chairman in the mid-2000's.
Alan Shore is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 10:42 AM
  #150758  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer
Eliminating age 65 would not solve the regional pilot shortage. On the contrary, many of us in our 30s/40s will look at the stagnation of the last 10 years and decide it's not worth sticking around if "paying our dues" means another ten years in the minor league.

A lot of us stuck it out by telling ourselves (and our families) "It's only five years and then the majors will be hiring again"

Many of us could replace our regional pay tomorrow, but haven't bailed because we still want a possible career at the majors. Take that away and watch a thousand regional pilots turn in their two-week notice.
uh...... well.... shhhhhhh.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 10:43 AM
  #150759  
FlySmarterNotHarder
 
UGBSM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: fifi flyer
Posts: 564
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Compass was a part of our MEC. The converse of your own statement is, "If you are a member of the Delta MEC then you are a Delta pilot, I don't know how else you could look at it."

An obversion which demonstrates the logical error of dividing us from members of our own MEC, regardless of how you characterize the f-NWA design.

Rather than trying to tie together the logical breaks in the line you use to define professional pilots as "barbarians" I suggest the method used to successfully civilize more barbarians than any other, annexation. When we learn to acquire and incorporate our fellow professionals in unity, our numbers, thus our power, grows.

Scope is a leading indicator for bargaining results. If we've learned nothing else out of the last two decades, when we are able to more broadly define who are Delta pilots, we win gains in pay and working conditions.
BB, the term "Barbarians at the Gate" refers to the 1988 LBO of the RJR Nabisco company. It was a famous book (and movie), but maybe before your time. It was about the largest takeover of a company in Wall Street history. The parallel and image I'm trying to create is that of greedy hoards storming the castle to take over. That is, hoards of RJ pilots trying any way they can (think RJDC lawsuit) to get onto the Delta seniority list with their years of service and seniority intact without having to be interviewed and hired in competition with military pilots and the employment market in general.

Saying that you are really a Delta pilot anyway because you have a widget on your jet, it says Delta on your paycheck, you are a "division" of Delta, you are also an ALPA member, etc... is just another way of storming the castle.
UGBSM is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 10:44 AM
  #150760  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

.........................

Last edited by DAL 88 Driver; 03-05-2014 at 10:56 AM. Reason: Deleted
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices