Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2014, 05:28 AM
  #150721  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
BB, I agree with much of what you strive for, but this is one of the reasons I am NOT in favor of bringing their whole list onto our list. I've heard the initial SSP guys have a roughly 50% acceptance rate. I don't want to sound harsh, but I don't want someone in my right seat that Delta doesn't also want there.
The same argument could be made for every merger.

The benefits outweigh the down sides.

I think we all can agree it would be better if Delta did the screening before they entered the Delta brand and began flying Delta passengers.

It sounds harsh, but I'm mostly interested in the end state ... that Delta pilots perform Delta flying. Whether Delta wants to get there by setting up it's own operation and sun-setting the failing parts of DCI, fine. But with a $25,000,000,000.00 investment already made in DCI it has a lot of momentum. Who knows, management out at least $4 billion into Comair without shedding a tear at it's funeral.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 05:30 AM
  #150722  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by cencal83406
Well I'm not sure but he may be part of the flow...

Our IDs are made by Delta, look very similar, and are Delta property.

Things that make you go "hmmm"

I was told recently that the DAL hiring board marks a no for individuals who use "I am familiar with the DAL system" "I've flown Delta pax around". Apparently when the pax are on DCI aircraft, though the pax think they are on DAL, we are still a separate experience in HR's eyes.
Was that from the same persons that gave you the good information that you told me that AR got hired a month before he actually interviewed? Or something that AR himself said after he got the "don't bother again" from HR?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 05:35 AM
  #150723  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
BB, I agree with much of what you strive for, but this is one of the reasons I am NOT in favor of bringing their whole list onto our list. I've heard the initial SSP guys have a roughly 50% acceptance rate. I don't want to sound harsh, but I don't want someone in my right seat that Delta doesn't also want there.
It's below 30%. You've got to factor in that they were sifting through the lifer group, but the point remains the same. It's a group where many probably shouldn't be flying an airliner in the first place...
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 05:37 AM
  #150724  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

80kts,

Parts of the process were spooky on the DAL side. They had my payroll (sick time) records and full HR file from their subsidiary, plus my CP was there eating lunch. My info was already in Delta Security's database and my current Delta employee number is actually a recycled ASA number ... who knows what they were thinking, but there was a painting of the Delta Family Tree over in the Delta Offices that showed ASA and Comair merged into Delta and their brands disappearing. That disappeared (got painted over) when quite a few ASA pilots began to notice and they remodeled the space. In general, ASA (a publically traded Company with it's own marketing, code and tickets) was stripped of all of it's back office funtions and those jobs transferred to Delta (if you were a manager you transferred with longevity and some current Delta pilots did just that).

ALPA says Delta Management would have never merged their subsidiaries. Some of my friends in management who are now long retired stated, well, that was the plan (at least in the early days). My knowledge of that history isn't deep enough to make any definitive claims.

It would be interesting to know since thousands of people's lives were effected.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 05:37 AM
  #150725  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
A point that is lost on this forum time after time. ALPA also does not control the seniority list. The company decides who goes on that list and owns it. We do get to audit it contractually once a year.

Sailing;

You appear to have contacts on the 4th floor, and if I recall have some at AMR. Go ask your AMR buddies who is going to be on their interview panels? Isn't there a APA pilot representative that takes a active part in the hiring process of the individual candidates?

Maybe DALPA is missing an opportunity here.

On a side note, the MPL looks on the surface to allow low time pilots the to close the gap that was just legislatively created. Bar has a great point. There are other ways to do this that win for the profession and for the company. It only happens if the union takes the issue up and soon. The company is looking at a restricted ATP type of deal that for all practical purposes is a MPL. Its about cost.

Bar has also illustrated that the Pinnacle Bridge agreement was a promise of a maybe, and the pilots took significant cuts in pay for that maybe. What would the regional world be willing to forgo for a seniority number? It appears that Bar is on to something here, and the cost, and attraction issue could be solved by DALPA and all mainline carriers owning more of their flying, whether it be on once certificate or multiple. There appears to be an opportunity that Bar is driving towards.

A bargaining agent representing pilots that are performing the services of more of their carriers code leads to better leverage. It would not be about "just" the regional pilots, but also about better leverage for all levels of seniority. This issues get muddied when pilots trying to create squatters rights for someone that does not directly benefit nor is not represented by their union. Its really simple; more flying performed by DALPA=better leverage for all pilots going forward. Bar calls it unity, and hes right, we need that to create a response that is good for us and solves the corporate issue. If we don't we argue with each other and once again miss an opportunity to fly more of our flying, and recapture more leverage for years to come.
Free Mason is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 05:41 AM
  #150726  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
BB, I agree with much of what you strive for, but this is one of the reasons I am NOT in favor of bringing their whole list onto our list. I've heard the initial SSP guys have a roughly 50% acceptance rate. I don't want to sound harsh, but I don't want someone in my right seat that Delta doesn't also want there.

PG;

Go read the start of this forum seven years ago. 50% pass rate is probably the target pass rate for all interviews here at Delta. The first few months off of the street back in 2007 had pass rates above 80%. In the 2010 time frame the aviation knowledge test was sigificantly changed and the first time pass rate went way down. Changes to the cog screening this time have tripped more up. Point is the interviw is changed, and some of the pass rate varriances can be attributed to many things, but the reality is 50% is an acceptable rate.
Free Mason is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 05:43 AM
  #150727  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
It's below 30%. You've got to factor in that they were sifting through the lifer group, but the point remains the same. It's a group where many probably shouldn't be flying an airliner in the first place...
I don't know if I would go that far, but it is a group that for one reason or another never left a job they never intended to stay at in the first place. Some may have violations and a poor safety record, but for the most part I think most of them are just lazy and unmotivated which has shown in the interviews. Almost all of these guys can fly an airplane, they just can't study enough to pass a 50 question knowledge test.

I don't know what the new test is like, but the old one wasn't testing anything other than your ability to test. Very few of the questions on there actually tested your ability to fly the line on a daily basis.
RockyBoy is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 05:44 AM
  #150728  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lone Palm's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Port of Indecision and Southwest of Disorder
Posts: 587
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
It's below 30%. You've got to factor in that they were sifting through the lifer group, but the point remains the same. It's a group where many probably shouldn't be flying an airliner in the first place...

I take serious offense to your comment, there's plenty of us at Endeavor that work hard, keep our noses clean, and are just waiting for a chance at an interview let alone an upgrade sometime within a decade. Please don't characterize us all by the actions of the top percentile.
Lone Palm is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 05:44 AM
  #150729  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

See...

forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-05-2014, 05:48 AM
  #150730  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
... the point remains the same. It's a group where many probably shouldn't be flying an airliner in the first place...
That's a statement full of bigotry that flies in the face of the FAA, Delta, ALPA their air airline's training and checking people, etc .... are you sure that is the point you want to make?

However, if there were "lifers" they would not necessarily have to bid over to Delta (if we were to adopt a System Seniority Number annexation of their list). Sounds like they might not want to. If I were a senior Captain on a familiar jet with a girl friend in Jackson Mississippi (just kidding about the last part).
Bucking Bar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices