Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2014, 09:45 AM
  #150651  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Spending time in a sim, even hundreds of hours, where the worst thing that happens is you spill your diet soda, will never replace real life experience saving your own skin and tickets.

Nu
Agreed. Did not mean to sounds as though I was advocating for less experience.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 11:03 AM
  #150652  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
Default

Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) news: Delta Air Lines' Management Presents at 2014 Raymond James Institutional Investor Conference (Transcript) - Seeking Alpha
EdGrimley is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 11:21 AM
  #150653  
FlySmarterNotHarder
 
UGBSM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: fifi flyer
Posts: 573
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar

The full truth is that ALPA sits on the other side of the table and once a pilot is hired has a great deal of control over how that pilot's work is defined.
No argument there. But in spite of recent changes, I just don't see the impetus for Delta to merge with any of these regional airlines.

I see your desire. I see the RJ (and RJDC) pilot's wishes. I just don't see Delta's impetus.

The economic forces to compel them obviously aren't there. It's still preferable to hire from a mixture of regional and military pilots on the market than to pursue corporate mergers with contract carriers. I don't see a "pilot shortage" changing that.

PMFJI
UGBSM is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 11:40 AM
  #150654  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,306
Default

Originally Posted by UGBSM
No argument there. But in spite of recent changes, I just don't see the impetus for Delta to merge with any of these regional airlines.

I see your desire. I see the RJ (and RJDC) pilot's wishes. I just don't see Delta's impetus.

The economic forces to compel them obviously aren't there. It's still preferable to hire from a mixture of regional and military pilots on the market than to pursue corporate mergers with contract carriers. I don't see a "pilot shortage" changing that.

PMFJI
Judging by your position you have been in the industry for a while. How much change have you seen in the industry the last 20 years? You don't think the economics forces are changing? It appears the industry is about to be turned on its head the next 5 years, it might not force mergers but it will force massive change. There is no way around it. Anything airlines can do to keep their planes in the air and labor cheap they will try, flows, mergers, hybrid-mergers, preferential interviews. One end game scenario is massive consolidation. If you can't keep planes in the air and passengers moving then the economic forces will force their hand one way or another. Those economic forces you references are quickly changing and those changes have only just begun.
Nantonaku is online now  
Old 03-04-2014, 11:45 AM
  #150655  
FlySmarterNotHarder
 
UGBSM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: fifi flyer
Posts: 573
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar

Your generation has an affinity for it's traditions....
The safe course for ALPA is to favor ALPA members.
BB I enjoy reading your posts particularly. I'm only here on this forum anyway to try and gain the perspective of other pilots. Even those, or maybe even especially those, of a different "generation" of pilots. Maybe we just look at economic forces differently.

So excuse me for saying this, but I think that maybe sometimes your generation forgets that although airline pilots are almost always union pilots, from many different unions even, the fact remains that the companies we fly for are not all about unity. They are in fierce competition with each other and would kill each other off at every legal opportunity. The history of airline failures and startup speaks for itself.

I think maybe the influence of guys like Dan Ford are behind some of this idea of "branding" where you think all ALPA pilots should be unified under a "brand". Or every pilot that flies a jet with a widget on it has to be unified under a "brand".

Kind of ignoring the predatory nature of our business that has always been a "tradition" which apparently my generation has an affinity for.

Yes, I admit it. I want to kill off all of Delta's competitors, or barring that, out compete every one of them. Including regional, contract, fee for service ones. Maybe especially them.
UGBSM is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 11:57 AM
  #150656  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by 757guy
Go into Detanet and look under Electronic Flight Bag and there is a url listed for secure contect. Group Id is your fleet type. (Look at the URL I posted above - I didn't disclose the whole URL for security reasons.)

Hope that helps!

Got it! Thanks
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 12:31 PM
  #150657  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Quick question,
Has anyone done the SXM layover? Just looking for any info on whether it's spouse easy or not.
Thanks.
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 01:00 PM
  #150658  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by UGBSM
BB I enjoy reading your posts particularly. I'm only here on this forum anyway to try and gain the perspective of other pilots. Even those, or maybe even especially those, of a different "generation" of pilots. Maybe we just look at economic forces differently.

So excuse me for saying this, but I think that maybe sometimes your generation forgets that although airline pilots are almost always union pilots, from many different unions even, the fact remains that the companies we fly for are not all about unity. They are in fierce competition with each other and would kill each other off at every legal opportunity. The history of airline failures and startup speaks for itself.

I think maybe the influence of guys like Dan Ford are behind some of this idea of "branding" where you think all ALPA pilots should be unified under a "brand". Or every pilot that flies a jet with a widget on it has to be unified under a "brand".

Kind of ignoring the predatory nature of our business that has always been a "tradition" which apparently my generation has an affinity for.

Yes, I admit it. I want to kill off all of Delta's competitors, or barring that, out compete every one of them. Including regional, contract, fee for service ones. Maybe especially them.
I sense you think that recapturing scope might reduce some of the gains you want in future contracts. Actually, it's the other way around; Not recapturing scope allows management to pay you less, while limiting growth at the mainline. There are hundreds of factors on why this is true, but I won't bore you with a thirty page post. However, I will say this, management wouldn't outsource if it wasn't to their economic advantage, and since regionals overall lose money, it must come from mainline employee salary cuts. This is a result from the market value reduction of pilot labor due to the low salaries of regional pilots; This is the definition of wage arbitrage.

Yesterday, I found out Endeavor is sitting on hundreds of qualified resumes of people they refuse to hire. I suspect that the pilot shortage isn't real, and that management is using the parking of the 50 seaters to staff the mainline size RJ's. When service gets cut to small cities, and the government gives management a blank check to solve the issue, what will it cost you?
Mesabah is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 01:07 PM
  #150659  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,759
Default

Originally Posted by 757guy
Anybody have any idea why the company refuses to let us use an Ipad Air for Airwatch Secure Content? I just got off the phone with the Airwatch help desk - they tell me that Delta removed my Secure Content from my Ipad Air and will only authorize its' use on Ipad 2 or 3.

All my pubs are gone - unless I want to go buy a new Ipad 2. Is anyone else as upset as I am about this move?
It's got to be a Delta/Microsoft decision. The Ipad Air can be approved, my buddy at Southwest just got his Ipad Air for their tablet program.

Iam annoyed that they took off the manuals too - why not leave the manuals and either get approval for the Air or just say it's not allowed for use airborne. Taking the manuals off kinda put a crimp in my studying for sim this week.

Southwest has a neat system, my friend told me about it last night - the company has a minimum requirement (32 gb ipad air with cellular) that costs $729 plus tax. Southwest reimburses you that amount, but you are free to get any larger sized ipad, you just pay the extra. Then, since they figure the battery last 3 years, in 3 years they give you money for the latest edition and you get to keep the one you had.
iaflyer is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 01:12 PM
  #150660  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
It was an interesting mistake because those who lobbied for it seemed not to care that the application of their proposed rule would not have prevented either Comair 5191 or Colgan 3407.

Your average armchair shrink can listen to the CVR and come to the conclusion that what was a factor in both accidents was, outsourcing.

The Comair CVR was a discussion of job loss and displacements punctuated by a few checklists. The Colgan CVR was all about maintenance staffing problems, the FO's plans to get a job at Alaska because her pay did not allow her housing situation to keep up with the airline's movement. The Captain was also dreaming the whole flight about his future career ... not the task at hand.

so if a regional pilot uses the wrong runway, or pulls when he should have pushed, or bring the flaps up during the push, outsourcing caused it? What is the cause when a mainline pilot uses the wrong runway(taxiway), or forgets to set the flaps for takeoff because his mind was somewhere else? Not making this a regional vs mainline match but I am trying to connect your logic. What is the cause of overflying an airport while discussing bidding and schedules if a regional guy does that vs mainline? Silly me, I thought human factors could affect all pilots. It doesn't matter if it is a regional guy distracted by talking about updating his resume, or a mainline CA talking about what cabin cruiser he is going to buy....the outcome and causes for the outcome are the same, not blamed on outsourcing.
IBPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices