Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2014, 07:39 PM
  #150461  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
65 percent of our pilots voted for this contract. You know, the one that allows more 76 seat regional jets to be ordered by Delta to be flown by non-Delta pilots. The trend is not reversing course. More and more efficient jets continued to be outsourced. DCI is shrinking, but flying is not being brought in-house. If we keep the same course, our next step is allowing more seat in the jets already being outsourced in return for parking more 50 seaters.
Huh????? That statement does not make any sense.

Denny
Denny Crane is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 07:49 PM
  #150462  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by UGBSM
No thanks.
Why not?

And why are you in favor of DC-9-10 sized aircraft being outsourced to the lowest bidder, off of our seniority list entirely?
gloopy is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 07:50 PM
  #150463  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A330
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by UGBSM
No thanks.
Weren't the DC9-10s at NWA 78 seats? Didn't the pay the same as the DC950s? Isn't the 717 the same as a DC950? I really don't understand the "no thanks." you fly the 717, don't you?
rahc is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 07:53 PM
  #150464  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrails's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,947
Default

Originally Posted by UGBSM
No thanks.
While your 717 schedule may feature 5 legs a day, E-175 crews are doing 2-3 legs a day with a nice variety of flying.

Yeah, who would want that to be at the career carrier vs. a vendor.?

Who would want the chance to bid to fly on that ghastly machine, that rolled out the same time as the 777, is loved by passengers, has the range to do some unique missions for it's size, the list goes on.
contrails is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:27 PM
  #150465  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Alright here is an idea and I have no idea how it'll turn out beforehand, but do any of the CPZ, EV, 9E, RAH or OO guys flying 76-seaters care to share their trips? Pick your favorites.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 08:29 PM
  #150466  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by kiteflyer
Bring back the RJ's to Delta. Start with the 76 seat Jets. They always were Delta Jobs. They Still are Delta Jobs. It's time a pilot with a Delta seniority number signs the release while flying one.
Originally Posted by UGBSM
No thanks.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 09:13 PM
  #150467  
Line Holder
 
Hornet1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 88
Default Max # of short calls changed?

I'm on reserve and I noticed on the reserve availability list that my max number of short calls is 8 for this month. Did I miss something? Do we have a new LOA? I have not received a reply from my rep asking the question.
Hornet1 is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 09:15 PM
  #150468  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,535
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Just because it's too good not to share ....


That little (MiG) is too close for comfort.

Last edited by Boomer; 03-02-2014 at 09:17 PM. Reason: Had second thoughts about using NATO code name for the MiG-15 when that's obviously a MiG-25.
Boomer is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 09:22 PM
  #150469  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer
That little (MiG) is too close for comfort.
I'll hit the brakes, he'll fly right by.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 09:37 PM
  #150470  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Why not?

And why are you in favor of DC-9-10 sized aircraft being outsourced to the lowest bidder, off of our seniority list entirely?


so go back 10 years, 69 jumbo RJs (counting 34 69-seat Avros), 154 DC9s.

Today -154 DC9s, +88 717s net of -66 mainline jets in this particular mission size. 69 RJs (35 CR7s at DAL and 34 Avro 85s at NWA) became 295 jets or net change of +226. That 295 number can go up to 325, which is above the 255 mark when a deal was reached on the 717.

To me, it looks like they were content operating the jumbo RJs in replacement of the "100 seater" until they got a deal they couldn't pass up on. Now if we've got a chance to bring the jumbo RJs to mainline, let's get em'. I'd rather have the jumbo RJs on property than outsourced, heck, I'd rather have the EMB-110 on property than outsourced.

Long live the EMB-110.


Last edited by forgot to bid; 03-02-2014 at 09:58 PM.
forgot to bid is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices