Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2014, 04:34 AM
  #150091  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by poostain
UAL buddy said they call the lax based 787's "the scab wagon"
Those guys stick together, they used to call the MD-80 that.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-26-2014, 04:34 AM
  #150092  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by ATL7ER
It's already here and has been for a long time.

SOPA = Vol 1 Section 20 Amplified Procedures. SMAC = Flight Crew Training Manual.

That's all SOPA/SMAC ever was at NWA. The idea of the rigidity of NWA procedures has created this urban legend in the eyes of South pilots as to what SOPA/SMAC was. I still have a copy of my fleet SOPA/SMAC from NWA. It is virtually identical to my DAL Vol 1 Section 20 and my FCTM, right down to the graphics.

Vol 1 has tables that specify CA/FO and PF/PM actions, callouts, responses, etc. THAT is precisely what SOPA was at NWA.

FCTM has amplified discussions of maneuvers including full page graphics of various procedures such as takeoff profiles, engine out profiles, etc. THAT is precisely what SMAC was at NWA.
How would this checklist item been responded to in the SOPA/SMAC world:

Exterior/Interior preflight......... (insert response) C
tsquare is offline  
Old 02-26-2014, 04:35 AM
  #150093  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,535
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
That's a hell of a photoshop job. You edited out the tug and put the engines on, wow. Good work.
Not to mention the mandatory 3-truck ARFF escort.
Boomer is offline  
Old 02-26-2014, 04:35 AM
  #150094  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
So, communicating with the FAs (and by extension, the pax) where we are in the departure process after the longest safety video in safety video history is violating sterile cockpit? I'll take my chances. Especially when I watch all the AA guys having to pull over waiting for their numbers. We're trying to be safe AND on time, right? Sheesh.

+1 ...............................
tsquare is offline  
Old 02-26-2014, 04:38 AM
  #150095  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,242
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
How would this checklist item been responded to in the SOPA/SMAC world:

Exterior/Interior preflight......... (insert response) C
"You did it, right"
maddogmax is offline  
Old 02-26-2014, 04:40 AM
  #150096  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by maddogmax
"You did it, right"
Not from what I heard with my own ears. I was questioned as to how the captain could answer "complete" because he personally did not do the walkaround. That is the kind of rigidity that is not needed. It is ridiculous and parochial.
tsquare is offline  
Old 02-26-2014, 04:41 AM
  #150097  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Still seems to be enough pilots/cabin crews willing to work at Ryannair wages for them to launch the first well funded and supported LCC across the Atlantic.

Flights to US will cost just ?10 on Ryanair ? O'Leary - Independent.ie

Don't know how many customers will enjoy crossing the pond in Ryanair style, but at $10 each way (well actually $7.38 going west) I'm sure a few will try.
full of luv is offline  
Old 02-26-2014, 04:47 AM
  #150098  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
Boeing looks to sell off 787 ‘terrible teens’ | Business & Technology | The Seattle Times

One more decent news story on the "terrible teens."

Name like that brings back memories of the "twisted sisters."

Thanks for the link. Here's the part I found most interesting:

Barring a global aerospace slump, Boeing should be able to place the reworked 787s with bargain-hunting airlines seeking twin-aisle jets to fly shorter, densely traveled routes, said Douglas Kelly, senior vice president for asset valuation at Chantilly, Va.-based aviation consultant Avitas.
“Asia seems like exactly the right place,” said George Ferguson, senior analyst with Bloomberg Industries in Skillman, N.J., especially if Boeing targeted sales to potential customers of the re-engined A330 contemplated by Airbus. “You can see it as a competitor to the A330.”
Buyers would probably pay less than half the current $211.8 million list price of the 787-8 version, Kelly said. The 787 teens have a market value of $115 million each for a single-unit or small lot sale, according to Avitas estimates. Airlines will probably demand 10 percent to 15 percent discounts, bringing the price closer to $100 million, Kelly said.
The upgraded Dreamliners will boast the same warranties as new planes, 10 percent fuel savings over Airbus’s A330-200 and creature comforts such as greater cabin humidity and dimmable electronic window shades, Kelly said. Their range will be about 1,000 nautical miles shorter than later 787s.
For carriers that don’t need to fly 7,850 nautical miles nonstop, as Boeing promises the 787 can do, the teens “still represent a good value,” Kelly said. “It’s just a matter of what price are you going to be prepared to pay for that versus a standard-build 787.


Anyone remember what the 10 A330's Richard ordered cost, per airframe, just to compare to these, at $100M each? I heard Richard said he would consider any used widebody, but at $80M (or less) each.
Timbo is offline  
Old 02-26-2014, 04:54 AM
  #150099  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,242
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Not from what I heard with my own ears. I was questioned as to how the captain could answer "complete" because he personally did not do the walkaround. That is the kind of rigidity that is not needed. It is ridiculous and parochial.
That was my point. Unless the captain does the walk around, programs the FMS and does everything associated with the preflight, he has to assume that his other crew members have performed their assigned duties. It has nothing to do with Sopa/Smac or whatever else you want to call it.
maddogmax is offline  
Old 02-26-2014, 05:00 AM
  #150100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,049
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Not from what I heard with my own ears. I was questioned as to how the captain could answer "complete" because he personally did not do the walkaround. That is the kind of rigidity that is not needed. It is ridiculous and parochial.
So, you have never done one flow, or checklist or flight using SOPA/SMAC, yet "That is the kind of rigidity that is not needed. It is ridiculous and parochial."

That, Bub, is ignorant.
boog123 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices