Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 272
Can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not, but the up-gauge is a result of the 50 seat RJs being replaced by larger RJ's and 717's.
I would say a reduction of 25% to the largest category in the company and a widebody category at that in a 6 month period will have a very dramatic effect on any progression for years to come.
Yes I new we are retiring 757's but this is the first I have heard of such a huge cut to the 7ER in such a short time.
I would say a reduction of 25% to the largest category in the company and a widebody category at that in a 6 month period will have a very dramatic effect on any progression for years to come.
Yes I new we are retiring 757's but this is the first I have heard of such a huge cut to the 7ER in such a short time.
You are taking one number and running wildly with it. The statement was that December flying hours will be 25% less than the peak hours of mid-summer--not that the airline needed 25% fewer pilots in those categories!
I doubt that there are ANY displacements from the 7ER in December, and if there are any, they will be modest.
I doubt that there are ANY displacements from the 7ER in December, and if there are any, they will be modest.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 272
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 272
You are taking one number and running wildly with it. The statement was that December flying hours will be 25% less than the peak hours of mid-summer--not that the airline needed 25% fewer pilots in those categories!
I doubt that there are ANY displacements from the 7ER in December, and if there are any, they will be modest.
I doubt that there are ANY displacements from the 7ER in December, and if there are any, they will be modest.
I apologize for running wild. I just immediately speculated that if was the first volley to start managing expectations.
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
the real person responsible for the A330 at NW was Mickey Foret who was the numbers guy for years there.
GF
Interesting about the A350. Under the heading of "you never know if someone knows what they're talking about when they tell you something", but I was told that the Feds were going to see if it was possible for an A330 guy to fly the A350 with just differences training. I asked an A330 check airman if we could be one fleet if we got the A350, and he said no way.
Calling the Iceman........Iceman come in.
Ferd
Calling the Iceman........Iceman come in.
Ferd
But for sure.......Foret was Gary Wilson's money man and he is a very very good money man. But I've always wondered if he's still Wilson's boy on Delta's board.....cuz you know Wilson is still around somewhere.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 121
AE
With regards to the AE I think crew planning is just playing offense. THey want guys to volunteer to bid off than get displaced because lets be honest we will have ZERO training capacity to deal with displacements. I am sure we will just stay fat. If you displace one ER CA that could lead to 8 training events and 4 possibly for an FO. if we want to hire north of 600 how can we afford to train for displacements. Not going to happen
With regards to the AE I think crew planning is just playing offense. THey want guys to volunteer to bid off than get displaced because lets be honest we will have ZERO training capacity to deal with displacements. I am sure we will just stay fat. If you displace one ER CA that could lead to 8 training events and 4 possibly for an FO. if we want to hire north of 600 how can we afford to train for displacements. Not going to happen
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post