Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2014, 05:01 AM
  #146751  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dirtdiver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 767A
Posts: 791
Default

Originally Posted by LOBO
Q: How will the new rule affect crew rest breaks on augmented flights?


A: The pilot flying must have two hours of in-flight rest available in the second half of the flight FDP.


How are guys using this info? Does the PF have to take the third break on a 3 man crew?
IMHO since the FDP includes the 90 minute prior show time, the middle break is in the second half.

The problem I see arising is on the shorter flights sometimes the breaks are less than 2 hours.
Dirtdiver is offline  
Old 01-15-2014, 05:02 AM
  #146752  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,918
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Another amusing "there is my opinion, and then there is the wrong one" view. Just because you prefer 12-hour min layovers doesn't mean that anyone not sharing your opinion doesn't "value his health."

The new 10 hour hard minimum layover is reasonable. The rules under part 121 were not.
Another opinion.

My opinion (worth exactly what you're paying to read it): A pilot who prefers less than 12 hours' rest may think he values his health, or may not care. I think that getting 9 hours of sleep and a decent breakfast (ie: 12-hrs minimum) is a bare minimum to maintain a semblance of health in this very unhealthy profession. Smokers may value their health, too. It doesn't mean they have a clue.

Last edited by GogglesPisano; 01-15-2014 at 05:17 AM.
GogglesPisano is online now  
Old 01-15-2014, 05:02 AM
  #146753  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LOBO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Right Seat over the CONUS
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun

Here is the FAA,s first word on the subject.

Carriers will be required to provide their crew with a 10-hour rest opportunityprior to commencing a duty period that includes flying. While the 10-rest period may include the amount of time it takes to get to or from a flightcrew member's house or hotel room, the actual amount of time required for a sleep opportunity may not be reduced
below 8 hours. In addition, the length of continuous time off during a 7-day period has been extended from 24 hours under the existing rules to 30 hours. Additional time off is required for individuals whose internal clock may be off because of flipping back and
forth between different time zones.

The fact that the FAA clarified the above to mean 10 hours off but not less then 8 hours in the room is not DALPA's fault.

They didn't say 8 hours in the room from your own quote.

"Opportunity" - a set of circumstances that makes it possible to do something

If I'm not in my room, ready for bed; my circumstance to goto bed has not been meet.

This is what I will use!!! I hope our union can stand behind us.

Last edited by LOBO; 01-15-2014 at 05:44 AM.
LOBO is offline  
Old 01-15-2014, 05:09 AM
  #146754  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 7ER Capt
Posts: 461
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The question is what is FAR legal.
I don't believe there is an attorney in the land, that could successfully argue post-incident, that the crew had the opportunity for 8hrs sleep with only 8hrs "behind the door"

Obviously, we will not agree on this interpretation.

I only wish my union would agree with this common sense interpretation and get this crystal clear in our favor... for once.
LivingTheDream is offline  
Old 01-15-2014, 05:12 AM
  #146755  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dirtdiver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 767A
Posts: 791
Default

Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
I don't see where it says "behind the door". Sleep is sleep. Not getting ready for bed... not getting ready to go to work.

I don't accept less than 9hrs "behind the door". That gives me and my crew a half hour to get ready for bed and a half hour to get ready for work. That gives one a minimum of 8hrs sleep.

I did that before 117 and I'll do that now.

If my reps are not on board with this, they are not "scheduling with safety... period. I'll be contacting my reps today.
It may take crews calling them on this one to fix it. If I haven't eaten (how often do you get fed on a domestic flight?), need to shower or iron a shirt, these ancillary items need to come out of the layover time, not the sleep opportunity time. As long as we accept 8 hours behind the door as 8 hours of sleep opportunity, we can expect it see trips scheduled that way.

Back in the AF, sometimes we couldn't get mx to fix a recurring gripe...until we wrote it up off station. When it affects the operation, it gets noticed.
Dirtdiver is offline  
Old 01-15-2014, 05:22 AM
  #146756  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
I don't believe there is an attorney in the land, that could successfully argue post-incident, that the crew had the opportunity for 8hrs sleep with only 8hrs "behind the door"

Obviously, we will not agree on this interpretation.

I only wish my union would agree with this common sense interpretation and get this crystal clear in our favor... for once.
Amen! That is exactly the reason I brought this up.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 01-15-2014, 05:35 AM
  #146757  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Here is the FAA's first communication on the subject. ALPA is simply telling you what the FAA has explained to them. ALPA has spent far more time and effort trying to insure its pilots are in compliance then any other union. I know you think their efforts have been terrible but that's your opinion. I have received a huge amount of communication from the union on 117. They have written a excellent app to help with compliance. They had trained people in every lounge I went into the first week. They set up a 24 hour 117 hotline. They have aggressively pushed the FAA to clarify gray areas and published timely answers when they have come out. I Jumpseat on many airlines. The non ALPA airlines have received nothing even remotely close to what ALPA has done.
Where did I say that ALPA's overall efforts on 117 have been terrible? I'm talking about ONE THING they are apparently getting wrong. It's an important thing. But it's only one thing. The rest of the information we've received from ALPA on 117 (including the app... although I wish it had the capability of downloading the rotation information into it), while a bit of a fire hose of information, has been pretty good IMO. Don't put words in my mouth, sailingfun.

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Here is the FAA,s first word on the subject.

Carriers will be required to provide their crew with a 10-hour rest opportunityprior to commencing a duty period that includes flying. While the 10-rest period may include the amount of time it takes to get to or from a flightcrew member's house or hotel room, the actual amount of time required for a sleep opportunity may not be reduced
below 8 hours.
In addition, the length of continuous time off during a 7-day period has been extended from 24 hours under the existing rules to 30 hours. Additional time off is required for individuals whose internal clock may be off because of flipping back and
forth between different time zones.

The fact that the FAA clarified the above to mean 10 hours off but not less then 8 hours in the room is not DALPA's fault.
Come on, sailingfun. I know you're smarter than that. This is basic Reading Comprehension 101 stuff. Where do you get "8 hours in the room" out of THAT?

What it DOES say (and so does the FAR) is that an opportunity for 8 hours of sleep is required. It's impossible for any human being to get 8 hours of sleep with only 8 hours in the room. Therefore, our contractual "8 hours behind the door" is a clear violation of FAR 117.

Sailingfun, please answer the following two questions. Answer them with a "yes" or "no." And then explain to me how exactly 8 hours behind the door is legal:

1 - If you only have 8 hours in a hotel room (from walking into the room to walking out of the room the next morning), do you have an opportunity for 8 hours of uninterrupted sleep?

2 - Does FAR 117 require an opportunity for 8 hours of uninterrupted sleep?
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 01-15-2014, 05:43 AM
  #146758  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Dirtdiver
As long as we accept 8 hours behind the door as 8 hours of sleep opportunity, we can expect it see trips scheduled that way.
Not exactly. We still have the minimum 10 hour layover per FAR 117. They can't schedule it (and it can't be) any less than that. I don't expect the 8 hours behind the door to be an issue under normal circumstances. The 10 hour layover should allow a good 9+ hours in the room in most cases. It's the unusual circumstances (like a major snow storm where ground transportation to the hotel takes a lot longer than normal) where the 8 hour uninterrupted sleep opportunity will become a factor.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 01-15-2014, 06:17 AM
  #146759  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

So, when an "I need 8 hour call" occurs, why not call them after you're fed & in bed? Then start the time when you hang up?

People hate the unknown and want an answer before the shutdown checklist is complete. This is a "you got plenty of time" bucket thing. Go to your hotel, make sure they have a room (it is always on the short layovers that they act like it is a total surprise that a Delta pilot is there) get settled in, THEN CALL.


A call to a local restaurant that delivers can save you time. If you have room mates, make sure they are ready for sleep as well.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 01-15-2014, 06:27 AM
  #146760  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
So, when an "I need 8 hour call" occurs, why not call them after you're fed & in bed? Then start the time when you hang up?

People hate the unknown and want an answer before the shutdown checklist is complete. This is a "you got plenty of time" bucket thing. Go to your hotel, make sure they have a room (it is always on the short layovers that they act like it is a total surprise that a Delta pilot is there) get settled in, THEN CALL.
And that STILL doesn't satisfy the requirement of FAR 117. You didn't allow for time the next morning to get ready. Per the FAR, you need an opportunity for 8 hours of sleep, not 8 hours in the room or 8 hours from laying down in bed. Unless you've found a way to brush your teeth, shower, shave, get dressed, and pack in your sleep, your suggestion still does not work.

Oh, and those two (or is it four?) don't look ready for sleep.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices