Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2009, 10:19 AM
  #14501  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Carl!!!!!!!... did you really say that We didn't buy NWA????? I am speechless. Welcome aboard. You have either really made the transition or forgot to logoff.
I really did say it! This month was our bid period 5. I am now a Delta pilot. Now THAT should leave you speechless.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-12-2009, 10:23 AM
  #14502  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 841
Default

ACL How many MD-90's does JAL have?
firstmob is offline  
Old 09-12-2009, 10:27 AM
  #14503  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
Because ALPA wanted the f/a's to cross.
How does ALPA have input on F/A actions? And what about the pilots? Did ALPA want them to cross too?

... Look, I don't have the background on the AMFA strike, and maybe a lot of it will make sense as I discover more. For now, it will suffice to say that we each have our approach, and our F/A's have their approach. You may have backed up yours in a way that was quite honorable and logical, and we've probably done the same. Right now, seems that the South F/A's voted down AFA, and it seems that we are, at a minimum, supportive of their wishes.

As we work together, maybe we'll understand each other better. And maybe the consensus will be among F/A's that they want a union, in which case: more power to them. For right now, I wouldn't inpugn the motive of either pilot group for how they are or aren't helping or respecting the F/A's by interfering in their affairs.

So I suggest we don't have a big debate about who is rightly supporting what, and we wait to get these groups on one page to figure out what they want, and what we want. In the meantime, Nu's question is not framed correctly. This has nothing to do with respect or trade unionism, and everything to do with the context in which different parts our "family" operated under before.

Afetr Nu and I get to sepnd some time with F/A's from the opposite pre-merger group, maybe this discussion can take place again, with better information on both sides.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 09-12-2009, 10:39 AM
  #14504  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
AMR, and CAL are well in to their talks. Both are our for blood and I am guessing will be decided long before we enter. They are working off of our JPWA. UAUA's pilots are madder than a hornet and have given so much to an inept management team that I do not see them giving the farm to keep them afloat.
The point of this is we really are the last ones up. We will have a fairly good perspective of how things are going forward come 2012.
Do you think we ended up in that position by accident?
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 09-12-2009, 11:03 AM
  #14505  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
I think your question is flawed. Taking a neutral stance on AFA (as opposed to actually lobbying against it, which is not approriate) is not failing to respect anyone, nor is it being "anti-union".......

......So I think we should simply agree the line not to be stopped is ...a picket line. Beyond that, other people do what they want, and organized if and how they want.
Outstanding point. Except I wasn't solely talking about DAL pilots who remain neutral for the AFA efforts to organize. In fact, the main point that I was making about our pilots and the AFA was that there are some who are lobbying FA's to vote no, which is hardly neutral.

In response to Bar, my post really asks why there seems to be an increasing amout of pilots who don't respect the unions (already on property, at any company, in any industry) or their members. Look on our message board and see how our pilots talk about UAW workers. I sense there is an increasing anti-(non pilot)union sentiment among pilots.

My post had nothing to do with stopping people from doing what they want if and how they want. It has everything to do with our attitude toward other unions and their members.

New K Now
newKnow is offline  
Old 09-12-2009, 11:23 AM
  #14506  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

The have 16 Md's 90's of which 16 are owned outright.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-12-2009, 11:25 AM
  #14507  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Do you think we ended up in that position by accident?
No I do not. I think you knew the answer to how I thought about this question before you asked it.

It is also why it is a fools errand to push negotiations out for half a decade. 2012 is OK but an election year.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-12-2009, 11:28 AM
  #14508  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
The have 16 Md's 90's of which 16 are owned outright.
Well that's not enough!
johnso29 is offline  
Old 09-12-2009, 11:31 AM
  #14509  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Guys there are ways to get new airplanes. Deals can be made to return existing ones for new ones. Just wait.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-12-2009, 11:39 AM
  #14510  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
It is also why it is a fools errand to push negotiations out for half a decade. 2012 is OK but an election year.
Agreed. But here's the $64,000 question come 2012. Do we try to get 80% of what we think is "fair", realizing it will take 3+ years of extended contract negotiations to get that. Or do we settle for 70% and wrap it up in a year, but be labeled as caving again?

And before anybody says I'm caving to accept 70-80%, realize that 70% to us is 100% to the company, and 80% is 110%. We will never agree on what's "fair". We will point to C2K plus inflation; the company will point to industry standard. My bet is we'll end up at the top of the industry, but below C2K + inflation.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices