Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2013, 10:52 AM
  #144441  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 489
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I am prolly reading way more into this.

I am really looking for more of a way to sharpshoot this thing..

Imho The only real way to sharpshoot on your last off day prior to reserve day is to do your sked check as close to 1500 as you can, and remember that you have no further obligation to check you schedule or be contactable for the rest of the day. At 12:01, they can assign you a trip or SC, and if legal (per fars and contract), you are obligated. That part has always been that way. We will see what happnes in the future.

You may want to get in the habit of taking a screen shot or printing your schedule when you do your check.


There are times when they will call after you have done your sked check on your last day off to try and change what you had (LC to trip, SC to trip, etc,). A fishing expedition to see if they can get someone/or someone wants to acknowledge and report for something they would not have had to per their original assignment. There are times when they are indeed just giving you a heads up so that you don't have to be disturbed at 12 in the morning if you don't want to, but sometimes it is the fishing expedition.
APCLurker is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 10:52 AM
  #144442  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyallnite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Posts: 1,898
Default

That is an exaggeration, and you know it.

The company is LITERALLY working within the overly vague confines of the contract on this. How is that an exaggeration?

That is incorrect.

Is it? Then please tell me exactly what DALPA is doing for the pilots being denied sick leave and being put on Administrative Leave besides telling them over the phone to just go back to the Doctor?



Who gives the CP the list? ALPA, or an over zealous manager on the 4th floor? Why should a CP's complaint about stupid things they are forced to do be a concern of ours?

Because DALPA insisted that this wouldn't be a problem, and that so few pilots would ever even be affected. Now it seems, that isn't the case at all. Big surprise.



Are you suggesting that each pilot has no say or accountability in their sick calls? Really? ALPA doesn't issue our Medicals. The FAA does. If you don't meet the medical requirements, call in sick. If Delta won't pay you for it, contact ALPA. Unless you are suggesting that no employee has ever called in sick when they weren't actually sick, then perhaps this would be a good time to acknowledge that employers have the right to verify some sick call occurrences - at this airline, and at others.


"Some employers"... sure. How about...McDonalds. You sound like you fully support going after the pilots who call in sick, just to make sure you catch the few who, in your opinion aren't sick. People with your sort of opinion are the problem, not the guys calling in sick. We are airline pilots. Need I remind you of what you are signing on the flight release? How about we pay our pilots sick time and if they don't use it, pay it out. Problem solved. Giving the company a contract section wide enough to drive a truckload of Benadryl through is not the answer.


Can you post which FAR guarantees our pay when we call in sick? If Delta is making you fly after you tell them you are sick, that might be a good time to call the FAA. But if you believe you should be calling the FAA because Delta is making you verify a sick call, or because Delta is not paying you for sick time, you might not fully understand the FAA's role in this.

The FAA prohibits airlines from coercing pilots to fly sick. Threatening administrative leave, docking pay, and engaging in paper chases with doctors and administrators sounds an awfully lot like just that. If I were one of those guys, I'd make sure the FAA had my name on file just in case that I decided one day that my sore throat and stuffy nose wasn't bad enough to justify the harassment I'd be given for calling in sick, in the event something happened on the line.

Last edited by flyallnite; 12-09-2013 at 11:04 AM.
flyallnite is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 10:54 AM
  #144443  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyallnite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Posts: 1,898
Default

edited........................
flyallnite is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 10:57 AM
  #144444  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
...
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 11:13 AM
  #144445  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by Dash8widget
The leverage that the company is trying to use lies in the following:

23.S.5. A long call pilot:
b. must be able to report for an assigned rotation which reports no earlier than 12 hours from the first attempted contact by Crew Scheduling.
c. must be able to report for a rotation within 12 hours of first attempted contact for conversion to short call.

What SD was basically saying in his letter was this - if you don't acknowledge your assignment outside the 10 hour window then you are no longer "able to report for an assigned rotation" and are therefore in violation of 23.S.5.b. So even if you follow the contractual acknowledgement guidance to the letter, you can still be in violation of the contract

At first blush, I was thinking ALPA had the leverage here. Now, I'm not so sure
So you're assuming that SD can just erase Section 23.S.6.b. ??

6. A long call pilot who is assigned a rotation or converted to short call:
a. prior to release from a rotation, must acknowledge such assignment or conversion prior to release.
b. via telephone contact or electronic placement on his schedule on his last non-fly day (other than a vacation day) before an on-call day, must acknowledge such assignment or conversion no later than:
1) three hours before the scheduled report of the rotation, or
2) one hour before the scheduled start of the short call period.

I agree with APCLurker.

Why do you think one section is enforceable and the other is not?

That 9 hours without obligation is the heart and soul of our contractual "long call". Without it you can never silence your phone for a good night's sleep or take a flight that is longer than 2 hours or go anywhere outside of cell coverage, you can't see a movie longer than 2 hours. etc. etc. etc.

Dickson's letter just put every long call reserve on "contact short call".

His letter also relies on the PWA "Long Notice Ladder" provisions and says he's being forced to do this because it requires "any awarded/assigned rotation that is scheduled to report 12 or more hours after first attempt to contact to be assigned to an available long call reserve pilot before the rotation can be assigned to a short call pilot or any other pilot lower on the Section 23 N. “long notice ladder.”

He likes the long notice ladder and seems to think he has to follow it to the letter but what he doesn't mention is that the short notice ladder has just been completely blown away by his new memo. Sections 23.O. 2, 3,4,6,12,13,14,16,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25 and 26 are no longer legal according to Dickson. There can never be another short notice white slip or green slip or yellow slip. That little jewel is going to require significantly more short call reserves all by itself. He's picking and choosing the parts of our PWA that are to management's advantage and just saying that the ones that work for pilots no longer exist.

I think we all see the dilemma here. Since FAR 117 several provisions of our contract no longer make sense or are in conflict with each other. It must (and will) be re-written. It is either going to be done through negotiations or by the system board or an arbitrator in a grievance procedure.
Steve Dickson can't do it in a memo. (unless ALPA let's him. We haven't heard from them yet )

Last edited by Check Essential; 12-09-2013 at 11:55 AM.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 11:35 AM
  #144446  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: A-320/A
Posts: 588
Default

is anyone else having trouble logging onto iCrew?
chuck416 is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 11:36 AM
  #144447  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 489
Default

Originally Posted by Dash8widget
True, but the contract doesn't say that you have to acknowledge AT three hours prior to report - just that you have UNTIL three hours prior.

Yep. You don't have to wait until 3 hours prior (I never have), but you can if so inclined/can't do otherwise per our current contract.



They don't have to unilaterally change the contract to REQUIRE a 2 hour acknowledgment window - the "able to report" clause along with FAR 117 requirements, takes care of it for them.
This is where we'll have to agree to disagree. There are two clauses in our contract which will soon be contradictory. Why do we have to give ours up? They could meet "our" clause of 3 hour to show acknowledgment and 117 by changing the way they do business or agreeing to changing "their" portion of the 12 hour able to report clause. They don't want to in order to keep costs down.

So again I ask, are we going to fight for our 3 hour acknowledgment or something that is mutually agreeable, or are we going to roll over and give it up. I don't agree right now that our 3 hour prior acknowledgement just vanishes due to 117. Perhaps their 12 hour able to report could vanish instead? It can be made to work at greater expense. Again reference the case law.

Your example of:

Again, they are leaning on the "able to report" requirement (also contractual). Being "able to report" includes, among other things, that you are legal to report. By not acknowledging an assignment outside the 10 hour window, YOU are making yourself illegal for the rotation - and therefore, "unable to report." That puts you in violation of the contract. They don't have to unilaterally change the contract to REQUIRE a 2 hour acknowledgment window - the "able to report" clause along with FAR 117 requirements, takes care of it for them.
could also be looked at as working against them as well. Substitute the statement in your example with: "Pt 117 takes care of/extends the able-to-report within 12 hours for us because we have the don't-have-to-acknowledge-until-3 hours-prior clause." You seem to be looking at it from a one-way street perspective. It seems to me that it can work both ways. And I hope that we are fighting for that other way, or at minimum, a melding satisfactory to us.


Then again I could be talking out of where the sun don't shine, but hopefully not.

Last edited by APCLurker; 12-09-2013 at 11:54 AM.
APCLurker is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 11:41 AM
  #144448  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 489
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Why do you think one section is enforceable and the other is not?.....

That 9 hours without obligation is the heart and soul of our contractual "long call".....

Dickson's letter just put every long call reserve on "contact short call".....


I think we all see the dilemma here. Several provisions of our contract no longer make sense. It must be re-written. It is either going to be done through negotiations or by the system board or an arbitrator in a grievance procedure.
Steve Dickson can't do it in a memo. (unless ALPA let's him. We haven't heard from them yet )

Yep. Especially the last paragraph.
APCLurker is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 11:49 AM
  #144449  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

...crickets from DALPA...

(except for the "expectation managers" peddling their wares here)
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 11:50 AM
  #144450  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I see you're back to posting bad information again. There is no 30 minute buffer. It's closer to 20 minutes as there are a number of days on the 320 and 737 that approach 8:40. Atl-las is a turn next month on the 737, and on the 320 there are piles of 3 leg days approaching 8:40.

Far west coast is out of the question still out of Atl,but it opens up a lot of the Caribbean and Central America that was once double crewed... As well as longer 3 and 4 leg days.

I noticed the 73 has some trips from the west coast to JFK with an additional leg that puts us over 8 hours. As I understand the new rules, if you push on the second leg at JFK, get stuck on the ramp and your flight time would put you over 9 hours you become a pumpkin. Is this the correct interpretation?
orvil is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices