Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2013, 05:02 AM
  #141851  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by chuck416
Hi Fellas,
I'm a dinosaur driver (DC-9) and am starting systems study for the A-330. Also, I'm a MacBook Pro owner. I think ya'll can see this one coming. Is it absolutely necessary to get bootcamp to access the study materials on the thumb drive? Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Chuck,
Pretty sure all the initial systems cd's/USB's require windows to run. After that training the rest are MAC friendly. Just went through a course and I too would have thought that had all been migrated to mac friendly by now, but not the case. I have one old Windows laptop that I keep around for just such occasion (mostly cause I didn't want to deal with bootcamp or other apple emulators), otherwise it collects dust.
full of luv is offline  
Old 10-24-2013, 05:18 AM
  #141852  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
If they only take 40 new 76 seaters and retain all the other 76 seaters there would be a total of 193 in the system. That provides a MBH-DBH of 1.35.

The table is in section 1 of the PWA.
I didn't mean the min ratio, instead what is the ratio between a mainline domestic fleet of 671 jets and DCI at somewhere between 395 and 420? Based on RA saying they may go to somewhere between 100-125 50-seaters and let's suppose they don't exercise their 30 CR9 options.

What's the resulting MBH : DBH ratio?
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-24-2013, 05:19 AM
  #141853  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Be sure to update your bids...

Don't say you weren't warned...

And remember that bigger pays more.
tsquare is offline  
Old 10-24-2013, 05:31 AM
  #141854  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
I didn't mean the min ratio, instead what is the ratio between a mainline domestic fleet of 671 jets and DCI at somewhere between 395 and 420? Based on RA saying they may go to somewhere between 100-125 50-seaters and let's suppose they don't exercise their 30 CR9 options.

What's the resulting MBH : DBH ratio?
Who knows how the airplanes will be utilized? The 737 fleet is the red eye machine. While 757 and MD88 crews sleep peacefully, 737 crews operate like an ER that left the relief FO at the outstation (Captain sleeping hemispherically while FO keeps himself awake with airplane coffee and the effects of irritable bowel syndrome).

My guess is there is a difference between paid for and having to earn their keep. The mainline fleet also tends to do longer legs with the initial 900 routes being a lot of trans con flying.

Gold bond is for daytime fliers. You can not assume straight block hour ratios until express pilots are googling hemorrhoid creme.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 10-24-2013, 05:35 AM
  #141855  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Chuck,
Pretty sure all the initial systems cd's/USB's require windows to run. After that training the rest are MAC friendly. Just went through a course and I too would have thought that had all been migrated to mac friendly by now, but not the case. I have one old Windows laptop that I keep around for just such occasion (mostly cause I didn't want to deal with bootcamp or other apple emulators), otherwise it collects dust.
you know why not just make the systems and vfd programs internet based? I had two thumb drives fail on me on the 717 vfd.

and do you have any idea how much fun it is to ask manual services for another?

but I did learn valuable lesson about using the speech function on my phone to email manual services about whether "I could come in and swap the thumb drive..."

I said it and looked down to see "I could cumswap the thumb..." it freaked me out, what if I hadn't proofread that??? I never proofread, it must have been my overworked guardian angel saying "okay, I'll bail him out ahead of time..."
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-24-2013, 05:39 AM
  #141856  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by sinca3
General observation, but if our CEO was to get 10% raise in one year I think we deserve more than we have gotten! See page 9:
http://go.gmiratings.com/rs/gmiratin...ySurvey.pdf%20
Oh, and Mark Zuckerwhatever is a *****!
Didn't we get more than 10% last year? 2/5ths of the pilots right around my seniority got their longevity restored and made a whole lot more than 10% annualized for a couple of years there.

Of course the are other factors. Thanks to the bidding post (whatever you want to call it) my pay last year was 4% less than the year prior, which was off from the year before that (even with the raises). Frankly, stagnation would be an improvement.

For an apples to apples comparison you would have to look at pay rates and position.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 10-24-2013, 05:42 AM
  #141857  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Who knows how the airplanes will be utilized? The 737 fleet is the red eye machine. While 757 and MD88 crews sleep peacefully, 737 crews operate like an ER that left the relief FO at the outstation (Captain sleeping hemispherically while FO keeps himself awake with airplane coffee and the effects of irritable bowel syndrome).

My guess is there is a difference between paid for and having to earn their keep. The mainline fleet also tends to do longer legs with the initial 900 routes being a lot of trans con flying.

Gold bond is for daytime fliers. You can not assume straight block hour ratios until express pilots are googling hemorrhoid creme.
I don't think 88 crews sleep peacefully on 8 hours behind the door to a show that was pushed back to a full 5 leg day.

I envy redeyes, no lax 73 crews redeyes just Atl 73 styled redeyes.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-24-2013, 05:43 AM
  #141858  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
you know why not just make the systems and vfd programs internet based? I had two thumb drives fail on me on the 717 vfd.
That's because the thumbdrive is still a Douglas product.



Did you grease the jackscrew? Maybe the memory got out of rig. Did you try opening a bleed valve before you wrote it up?
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 10-24-2013, 06:16 AM
  #141859  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
40 firm orders and 30 options.

Fwiw CRJ900's backlog shows only four customers: Delta Air Lines (40) and Adria Airways (1).
Bombardier doesn't support its products very well, otherwise, the C-series would be flying off the shelf.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 10-24-2013, 06:38 AM
  #141860  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Bombardier doesn't support its products very well, otherwise, the C-series would be flying off the shelf.
Dunno ... there is a good case for C Series sales starting to pick up.

At the moment everyone is taking a wait and see on the flight test program. Obviously they ran into some sort of issue with vibration (makes sense, the engines would have completely different resonance characteristics) and are re-doing the fly by wire code (why make airplanes which do not require FBW, FBW? Just makes things more complex for no payoff). But when they get rolling they are going to have 7 flight test articles running.

Boeing and Airbus are concentrating on the larger platforms (737-800/900 and 321's ) which have greater profit potential and are more CASM efficient than the smaller ( 700 / 319 ) jets. Those airplanes are "sold out." Not to say that a buyer couldn't get an earlier delivery by swapping slots, but, the point being that Boeing and Airbus have little incentive to heavily discount sales to beat back the C Series.

I'm becoming a bit of a C Series doubter based on the drag profile of those huge fans and what would appear to be a cruise speed that will force ATC to operate it at lower altitudes. We will see.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices