Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2009, 04:58 PM
  #14161  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by brakechatter
Who said anything about RJ limits? I personally don't want to limit any aircraft at Delta. I want GH to unleash the thunder with whatever he needs. It is who sits in the front of those airplanes that matters.
Amen, another person that sees it my way.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 05:00 PM
  #14162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JoeMerchant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: CRJ200 Capt.
Posts: 822
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
Look at it from the other side - if they are cutting DCI it should be a freebie for DAL to codify in the PWA what they intend to do anyways
That isn't the way negotiations work...Only DAL knows for sure the answer to this question...They will make you buy it whether or not that is the answer.
JoeMerchant is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 05:03 PM
  #14163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Of course, I am not privy to what developments are taking place as we speak, nor will I be until at least march, and maybe not at all. The overwhelming number of calls I have received have declared this #1. Polling will tell the true story, but "guaranteeing" that pay is #1 does not make you correct.
I know I can't guarantee anything, that is why I qualified it. I have been around long enough to make an educated guess. If you get 40 calls, you have spoken with 1% of your council. A rep will almost always get contacted by people that have a very high investment in a certain issue. That is why the scientific polling is a much better view of your pilot's opinions. A rep should also get out there and seek out opinions rather than waiting for people to contact him. That way you can also hear from the "silent majority".

If a rep only responds to the emails and calls he gets he will not really be doing his job, especially in a monster council like ATL. The vocal minority really doesn't represent the group.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 05:11 PM
  #14164  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
They can do that right now. Why would they want to cut these airplanes at DCI and then add them to mainline at a higher expense? That doesn't make any sense....ACL and others are fairly confident that Delta is going to reduce the DCI fleet...yet they also advocate using negotiating leverage to negotiate something they think is going to happen anyway...Doesn't make much sense.
First, I do not see DAL parking DCI's 76 or 70 seat fleet. The issue is that they need more seats to pay for you. You have gotten to expensive Joe. That will put pressure of DALPA to up the seat limit, and or the 76 seat RJ count. They state that they do not want any more, that could be for a few reasons. One of them is good and the other one is not.
I say make them put their money where their mouth is. Lower the 76 seat limit to current jets. Agree not to renew DCI lift contracts etc.

We are cutting the 50 seat jet. I say go for what you can. There will be a next gen 50 seater some time in the future that has economics that make sense. That is the reality. We need to plan for that this far out
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 05:14 PM
  #14165  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
I know I can't guarantee anything, that is why I qualified it. I have been around long enough to make an educated guess. If you get 40 calls, you have spoken with 1% of your council. A rep will almost always get contacted by people that have a very high investment in a certain issue. That is why the scientific polling is a much better view of your pilot's opinions. A rep should also get out there and seek out opinions rather than waiting for people to contact him. That way you can also hear from the "silent majority".

If a rep only responds to the emails and calls he gets he will not really be doing his job, especially in a monster council like ATL. The vocal minority really doesn't represent the group.
Another great point, and I agree that we need to do scientific polling. We also need to make it more accessible to the pilots. I think that a web based polling option should be looked at.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 05:17 PM
  #14166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JoeMerchant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: CRJ200 Capt.
Posts: 822
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
First, I do not see DAL parking DCI's 76 or 70 seat fleet. The issue is that they need more seats to pay for you. You have gotten to expensive Joe. That will put pressure of DALPA to up the seat limit, and or the 76 seat RJ count. They state that they do not want any more, that could be for a few reasons. One of them is good and the other one is not.
I say make them put their money where their mouth is. Lower the 76 seat limit to current jets. Agree not to renew DCI lift contracts etc.

We are cutting the 50 seat jet. I say go for what you can. There will be a next gen 50 seater some time in the future that has economics that make sense. That is the reality. We need to plan for that this far out
If we are "too expensive", then how does putting them at mainline lower that cost? You will be raising the mainline cost in the next contract...
JoeMerchant is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 05:29 PM
  #14167  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Why are you "happy" that there is less Saab regional feed? Are the Saab's taking your flying? Are they not helping to fill your mainline airplanes?
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Don't be that way. We're not "happy" to hear about furloughs.
Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
If you are so confident that DCI is getting cut, both WO and non-WO, why are you so worried about RJ limits in your scope section...Why bargain for something that is going to happen anyway?
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
The point of good scope is to keep people in their jobs.
Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Were Chicago&Southern pilots selected to "Delta standards"? Were Northeast pilots selected to "Delta standards"? How about Western pilots? NWA? Compass?

ASA has never had a fatal crash that was caused by pilot error. I don't believe Skywest has either. Can Delta say the same thing?
For starters, you are wrong and you have made one heck of an erroneous assumption. If you want to debate Air Safety Data, lets do it via PM. Allegations involving the tragic loss of friends and disputed "facts" has no place here. What is your point? Did anyone insult ASA pilots?

One "standard" is being able to work with others. I do not know you, but such an inflammatory post suggests a lack of diplomacy, situational awareness and common courtesy expected amongst professionals who work in small cockpits flying on 15+ hour flights to remote spots around the World.

You are a senior Captain at ASA, right?

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 09-08-2009 at 06:03 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 05:42 PM
  #14168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Were Chicago&Southern pilots selected to "Delta standards"? Were Northeast pilots selected to "Delta standards"? How about Western pilots? NWA? Compass?

ASA has never had a fatal crash that was caused by pilot error. I don't believe Skywest has either. Can Delta say the same thing?
Joe:

Many of our previous crashes have been industry changing events. Although very tragic and sad, we learned from them and have moved on. To polarize a group because of previous mistakes, is a party foul in my book. Yes, DAL and NWA has crashes ... and they try to hire to a very high standard. Human factors. Although tragic, there are other things to our jobs than flying airplanes.

Many of us want DAL paying passengers to fly on DAL jets that are flown by DAL crews. That way, we can control the product.

During the first day of my new hire class we were told "you were hired not only because of your safe record, but also because you have very high leadership experience and qualities and you are focuses on customer service. This is what we need at Delta."

It's about the customer service stupid.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 06:06 PM
  #14169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JoeMerchant's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: CRJ200 Capt.
Posts: 822
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
Joe:

Many of our previous crashes have been industry changing events. Although very tragic and sad, we learned from them and have moved on. To polarize a group because of previous mistakes, is a party foul in my book. Yes, DAL and NWA has crashes ... and they try to hire to a very high standard. Human factors. Although tragic, there are other things to our jobs than flying airplanes.

Many of us want DAL paying passengers to fly on DAL jets that are flown by DAL crews. That way, we can control the product.

During the first day of my new hire class we were told "you were hired not only because of your safe record, but also because you have very high leadership experience and qualities and you are focuses on customer service. This is what we need at Delta."

It's about the customer service stupid.
Implying that we are not as "professional", or that we are not of the same "standard", is a party foul in my book....If you pick a fight, be prepared to someone throw a punch back...You can't attack us, and expect us to just take it....
JoeMerchant is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 06:18 PM
  #14170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Yes someone did insult ASA pilots...It is common place to imply that ASA, CMR, or Skywest pilots are not of the same quality, and that we don't meet the same high "standard" as Delta pilots. If you make that attack, be prepared to have that attack countered.

You do know me, and we both worked on RJDC issues when you were at ASA....Honesty is another standard that you just failed.

I didn't attack the Delta "standard" until the pilots at my carrier were attacked by not meeting the same "standard"....and to think that you once defended the same things you now attack...
Joe, you're absolutely right I question the "standard" of some of the DCI carriers because there is a REAL difference in hiring standards. I'm not being arrogant, I'm stating a fact.

There is a reason why most civilian pilots start their careers are DCI. It is what it is. Stop talking up the DCI world like it is the end all be all of aviation flying and that it is a last stop career job. There is a marked difference between the two and you know it. You are hired help, and we're slowly getting to the point where a lot less of you are required. That sucks because people are going to lose jobs and no compassionate individual would want that. However, its either you or us .. and I'm voting for us. Sorry.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices