Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2013, 05:53 AM
  #140991  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyallnite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Posts: 1,898
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Your analysis is kind of a worst case scenario, but your logic is sound.

One can ususally figure out where management is going by looking where there is money to be made. Japan is worse than most other places when it comes to legacy costs. As a new'ish LCC, Skymark's CASM is only about half of ANA and 2/3rds of JAL. This makes the tie up highly attractive and Delta can make money from codeshare by charging fees to facilitate the codeshare (Skymark lacks the IT infastructure and needs Delta's help) and commissions on sales (Delta is the much larger brand).

Still the question is "or else." Had we not modified our contract NRT's market would continue to do whatever it will continue to do. Delta will not operate it at a loss for long (and I understand it makes money and will continue). By structuring the LOA as they did we are much more broadly protected against worst case scenarios and we facilitate both overflights and continuing widebody Asia flying to connect.

The bigger question is what the market will do when Haneda opens further and how many of those slots we recieve.

Well the 'or else' is going to happen, LOA or no LOA. If I painted a rather dark picture, I didn't mean to. Asia is looking at huge growth, and we'll be a part of it. I just think it's a foregone conclusion that NRT won't, and as I said, I think ultimately we'd be happy if we can get flights to HND from our U.S. hubs at times we'd like. But as far as hubbing out of Japan, I don't think we'll see that happening in HND.
flyallnite is offline  
Old 10-06-2013, 06:25 AM
  #140992  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,739
Default

Originally Posted by duder
Sorry to interrupt the Tennessee love fest but is there any truth to the rumor that the 717s will be further delayed because there are no Feds to certify it do to the shutdown? Sure hope that is not the case.
Better than that, there is a wing frame AD coming up.
badflaps is offline  
Old 10-06-2013, 06:54 AM
  #140993  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
So there's a new airline coming out of PHF flying 734s?
Is it People Express trying to get up and running? Or Xtra Airways(who was bought by People Express) doing more Spirit flying?
johnso29 is offline  
Old 10-06-2013, 06:54 AM
  #140994  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps
Better than that, there is a wing frame AD coming up.
Cool. More money for SWA to spend.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 10-06-2013, 07:11 AM
  #140995  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Question for ACL,

I just read the council 20 update on the PAC loa. There were a couple comments in there that got my radar up...again.

1. Council 20 guys wanted to have this loa go out for MEMRAT, but said they were in the minority. What is the general sense among reps and MEMRAT. IMO, it was improper that this loa not be a MEMRAT loa.
I hope ACL will chime in, but from what I have heard, not many were in support of MEMRAT. My understanding is the negotiators are very busy with this, FAR 117, and the upcoming Virgin Atlantic JV. Sending this LOA would cost money from roadshow expenses, and take time away from the negotiators when they need to be focusing on taking advantage of more upcoming opportunities. That's what I heard from a Rep.


Originally Posted by scambo1
2. They mention an actual lack of protections except "generic" codeshare protections on the new loa and the removal of a couple of the limits on codeshare. How does this protect dal pilot jobs?
LOA #13-03 also reduces the permitted average number of passengers per flight segment on foreign air carriers from 175 to 100 on Fifth Freedom flight segments between Japan and:

The People's Republic of China (i.e., Mainland China including Hong Kong)

The Republic of China (i.e., Taiwan)

The Republic of Korea

This improvement not only covers all of the current Fifth Freedom code share cities between Japan and Asia but also adds any potential code share to mainland China. This enhancement is in addition to the existing code share protections afforded in Section 1 E. 2. a. and b., which apply to all international code shares.

Originally Posted by scambo1
3. Hub issues aside, with the questionable long term future of the 757, they were concerned about the beach market loss and outsourcing of that flying...again, how does this protect dal pilot jobs?
How many beach flights originated from NRT?

Originally Posted by scambo1
Personally, I thought both 80s explanation of how NRT slots were the "chicken" and Alfa's explanation of how block hours were the "egg" (or vice versa) was pretty acceptable for covering the range of pacific flying, there is now apparently a significant lack of language protecting us from a flex down in pacific flying.
The 316 slots resulted in 116,400 block hours, or 54% of the Pacific flying block hours.

Section 1 E. 2. e. has been added, to now read:

e. passenger seats on any Fifth Freedom flight segment between Japan and Asian cities beyond Japan unless the Company scheduled during the previous rolling 12 month period, measured at the end of each calendar quarter starting December 31st, 2013, the greater of:

1) 182,750 aircraft block hours of Pacific flying, or

2) 85 percent of the total aircraft block hours of Pacific flying in the previous measurement period.

Note: The Company will be excused from compliance with this provision in the event a circumstance over which the Company does not have control is the cause of such non-compliance.

Originally Posted by scambo1
Why the rush? (To weaken language)
Why the lack of interest in MEMRAT?
Simply in the interest of debate, how was the language weakened? I see higher protections, with the protection expanding from just NRT to outside of NRT and into China as well. Considering the nuclear situation in Japan, and the forecasted increase in traffic for Asia in general, it looks like a very good move to me.

Last edited by johnso29; 10-06-2013 at 08:33 AM.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 10-06-2013, 08:16 AM
  #140996  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I hope ACL will chime in, but from what I have heard, not many were in support of MEMRAT. My understanding is the negotiators are very busy with this, FAR 117, and the upcoming Virgin Atlantic JV. Sending this LOA would cost money from roadshow expenses, and take time away from the negotiators when they need to be focusing on taking advantage of more upcoming opportunities. That's what I heard from a Rep.




LOA #13-03 also reduces the permitted average number of passengers per flight segment on foreign air carriers from 175 to 100 on Fifth Freedom flight segments between Japan and:

The People's Republic of China (i.e., Mainland China including Hong Kong)

The Republic of China (i.e., Taiwan)

The Republic of Korea

This improvement not only covers all of the current Fifth Freedom code share cities between Japan and Asia but also adds any potential code share to mainland China. This enhancement is in addition to the existing code share protections afforded in Section 1 E. 2. a. and b., which apply to all international code shares.



How many beach flights originated from NRT?



The 316 slots resulted in 116,400 block hours, or 54% of the Pacific flying block hours.

Section 1 E. 2. e. has been added, to now read:

e. passenger seats on any Fifth Freedom flight segment between Japan and Asian cities beyond Japan unless the Company scheduled during the previous rolling 12 month period, measured at the end of each calendar quarter starting December 31st, 2013, the greater of: 1) 182,750 aircraft block hours of Pacific flying, or

2) 85 percent of the total aircraft block hours of Pacific flying in the previous measurement period. Note: The Company will be excused from compliance with this provision in the event a circumstance over which the Company does not have control is the cause of such non-compliance.



Simply in the interest of debate, how was the language weakened? I see higher protections, with the protection expanding from just NRT to outside of NRT and into China as well. Considering the nuclear situation in Japan, and the forecasted increase in traffic for Asia in general, it looks like a very good move to me.
J29,

My use of the word weaken was a paraphrase of how the council 20 letter read. Just my own choice of words for brevity, deferring to guys more in the know than me.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 10-06-2013, 08:16 AM
  #140997  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Where's Elvis?
scambo1 is offline  
Old 10-06-2013, 08:32 AM
  #140998  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
J29,

My use of the word weaken was a paraphrase of how the council 20 letter read. Just my own choice of words for brevity, deferring to guys more in the know than me.
Ok. Thanks for the clarification. Like I said, hopefully ACL chimes in.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 10-06-2013, 08:57 AM
  #140999  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Totally off topic...I've been considering buying a used porsche Carrera. I'm looking at 1999-2003 cabriolets. Anyone got one or experience with one that cares to chime in on quality, durability, negatives, etc. it will be a toy car.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 10-06-2013, 09:10 AM
  #141000  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps
Better than that, there is a wing frame AD coming up.
Uh oh. More of a delay, or is it a quick fix or inspection type of thing?
newKnow is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices