Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2013, 05:19 AM
  #138461  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
And this is exactly why DALPA's reputation is waning. With the leverage we had as stated by you above, we got COLA pay raises fully funded by productivity concessions and profit sharing reductions. 5 LEC reps agreed and stated it was why they weren't voting yes for C2012. Yet DALPA still defends the actions to the hilt, calls a competing organization a "scourge" and complains about everyone misunderstanding their use of the term "our fair share of the flying."

This is just part of DALPA's current disconnect with its members.

Carl
Yep-got completely played. DALs market capitalization has increased by $7 Billion since the contract ratification. Historic profits, stock options payouts, stock buy backs, dividend payments and dalpa fell for the bluff at the poker table that there was simply no more $$$ to be had. And even after the hands have been flopped on the table, dalpa still defends its playing of the hand?
Columbia is offline  
Old 09-01-2013, 05:22 AM
  #138462  
Line Holder
 
Onigawara's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Position: 73na
Posts: 27
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
yeah I totally remember a conversation about why allow more 76ers just to move the 50ers up a short time.

was there a chart for that?
Opinion/rant to follow:

What really bothers me the most about all this is that even if everything we were told was true, about the company possibly having "over extended" themselves with 500+ 50 seat RJs, more outsourced 90 seat jets configured with 76 seats as the financial Rosetta stone to the companies problem, etc...

These are all issues for the corporate officers, Board of Directors and the Shareholders. Yes, their not so good decisions will certainly adversely affect the units of labor, but nowhere in any corporate structure that I'm aware of does a unit of labor stand on equal footing in capital expenditure decisions/mistakes as the Corporation's officers, directors and shareholders.

The fact that we, as labor, had to self finance to a certain extent our "participation" by conceding in parts of our contract with management is adding insult to injury.

My hope for the future is that we don't engage in further scope "adjustments" as part of the companies capital expenditure program.
Onigawara is offline  
Old 09-01-2013, 06:00 AM
  #138463  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,991
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
This is where you are just factually wrong. There was a short period of time when green slips went out to the categories they were furloughing from mainly because guys were burning through their sick leave before getting furloughed. Then there was a long period of time with virtually no green slips. In 2005, while waiting for PBS and the new scheduling system to be implemented there were a lot of green slips. This was to avoid a double furlough. If pilots were recalled to fill summer 2005, they faced a second furlough when the efficiencies were implemented. The decision was made to stay short staffed for the summer to avoid this. Other than these two brief period there were almost no green slips.



So how does this make me wrong? Are you denying that the Status-quo regarding greesn-slips changed? We now had had no "status quo." Status-quo is what shut down the no Green-slip campaign earlier. DALPA had another chance and choose not to pursue it. Maybe the reason was to avoid a double furlough as you say above but I doubt they would have been able to furlough without guys flying green-slips.

I was furloughed, then recalled and hundreds were still furloughed. I remember tons of Greesn-slips going out this time and DALPA was OK with it.

Any other furloughed guys remember Green-slips going out at this time?

Its really not worth arguing at this point. Most realize that DALPA will never, ever admit that it could have actually done something just a little bit better .............ever.

It must be nice to be perfect.

Scoop
Scoop is online now  
Old 09-01-2013, 06:36 AM
  #138464  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jay5150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 330 FO
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop

Any other furloughed guys remember Green-slips going out at this time?

Scoop

Remember it very well. Also remember the excuses. "Well, I'm sorry, but with these pay-cuts I need to make up the difference so I can keep all the stuff I immediately went out and bought after C2001."

The green slips in Orlando were flowing heavy.

I also remember what no-furlough language we had at the time being erased out of the contract with thousands on the street.
Jay5150 is offline  
Old 09-01-2013, 06:39 AM
  #138465  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by Columbia
Yep-got completely played. DALs market capitalization has increased by $7 Billion since the contract ratification. Historic profits, stock options payouts, stock buy backs, dividend payments and dalpa fell for the bluff at the poker table that there was simply no more $$$ to be had. And even after the hands have been flopped on the table, dalpa still defends its playing of the hand?
If market cap is an important metric to you, Delta is at approximately $17 billion. In 1998 Delta's peak market cap was about $28 billion. So Delta is 61% of the way back...

You quoted a guy on my ignore list talking about "cola pay raises". Contract 2012 puts his super premium pay rate at $270.25 plus 15% DC on 1/1/15. The highest pay rate he ever had prior to the merger was $264.96 plus 3% MPPP. BTW, it's still not enough.

You quoted those pay raises were "fully funded by productivity concessions and profit sharing reductions". The net productivity increase was about 125 jobs across a 10,500 pilot system. The profit sharing transition to pay ranged from $0 at no profit to $42 million at $2.5 billion in profit. The C2012 pay rate/DC increases were over 20% and worth $400 million annually in 2015. Not "fully funded", "cost neutral" or "offset" by a long shot.

So the cards are on the table. You didn't read the hands right.

Last edited by slowplay; 09-01-2013 at 06:56 AM.
slowplay is offline  
Old 09-01-2013, 06:53 AM
  #138466  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay

You quoted those pay raises were "fully funded by productivity concessions and profit sharing reductions". The net productivity increase was about 125 jobs across a 10,500 pilot system. The profit sharing transition to pay ranged from $0 at no profit to $42 million at $2.5 billion in profit. The C2012 pay rate increases were over $400 million in 2015. Not "fully funded", "cost neutral" or "offset" by a long shot.

So the cards are on the table. You didn't read the hands right.
I don't see anything in your spin cycle about the 300+ early-outs ALPA promised but didn't materialize.

And it's impossible to put a number on the QOL loss suffered from ALV+15, 7 short calls, sick leave harassment, I could go on.
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 09-01-2013, 07:07 AM
  #138467  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Really? DPA has been campaigning for 3+ years. They have failed to call a vote yet.
Logic fail. You call for a vote when you have the numbers. It's just a math issue.

Originally Posted by johnso29
If ALPA was "failing to do it's job", then DPA could've easily called a vote by now.
Nobody is saying ALPA is "failing to do its job". Many of us are just saying the job they are doing is allowing too many of our jobs to be outsourced. That's how over 5,000 pilots fill out cards for a independent union. Calling for a vote is not something you do without great care because if your vote fails (even by one vote) you can do nothing again for two years.

Originally Posted by johnso29
But after 3+ years, they still can't call a vote.
See above

Originally Posted by johnso29
This is Tim Caplinger dragging out his personal vendetta.
Again, not a single Delta pilot is signing on to an independent union to help avenge a vendetta from Tim. Don't you see how you sound when you/DALPA talk this way?

Originally Posted by johnso29
Like USAPA, he's doing nothing except creating division and wasting $$$.
I understand the talking points of equating us to USAPA, saying its all about undoing our seniority list, vengeance for Tim, etc. You're stating those talking points with great loyalty and emotion. But there's not a shred of evidence to back that up. You have a right to your opinion, but that's all it is johnso.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 09-01-2013, 07:15 AM
  #138468  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 841
Cool

Originally Posted by hitimefurl
I guess it's Dragon Con time here in the A T L. Summary: it's okay to pick on Moak, not so okay to pick on Caplinger, kinda okay to pick on Kingsley and then everyone tore apart the 76 seat section based on a rumor of 717 issues and there's still that widebody rumor to be squashed and no one cares that dues are going to go up if the DPA takes over in the next 8 months.
I find it very interesting that in the months of Jul & Aug AMR
took delivery of 8 new aircraft while still in chapter 11 bankruptcy and Delta had no new deliveries.
firstmob is offline  
Old 09-01-2013, 07:17 AM
  #138469  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
So how does this make me wrong? Are you denying that the Status-quo regarding greesn-slips changed? We now had had no "status quo." Status-quo is what shut down the no Green-slip campaign earlier. DALPA had another chance and choose not to pursue it. Maybe the reason was to avoid a double furlough as you say above but I doubt they would have been able to furlough without guys flying green-slips.

I was furloughed, then recalled and hundreds were still furloughed. I remember tons of Greesn-slips going out this time and DALPA was OK with it.

Any other furloughed guys remember Green-slips going out at this time?

Its really not worth arguing at this point. Most realize that DALPA will never, ever admit that it could have actually done something just a little bit better .............ever.

It must be nice to be perfect.

Scoop
My recollection around the time I was called back is that guys were complaining GS would dry up because of recalls. I'm not 100% sure anymore as to which LOA enabled it, but I seem to remember the summer of my return is when I got my thunder rolling. Now, setting aside the question of whether it's more OK for a returning guy to GS in these circumstances (it probably isn't), the climate I recall was all about the GS.

In the future, the form if furlough mitigation we need is actually to prevent GS AND WS flying above some threshold (ALV or your line award). Would protect us from the company and ourselves.

How does this fit into current events, anyway? What we did then was disgusting, but it wasn't done against the will of the group. We all know it's wrong to have ANY extra flying during furloughs, but we never ask for it to be negotiated into a contract. I would bet the % of pilots that ask for meaningful furlough protections in their top priorities is probably less than 15%.

I think Alfa is incorrect in downplaying GS availability during that time (but I'm going by personal experience, and maybe he has better data). I think the true story is probably more about ALPA faithfully representing the will of the pilot group. Which reveals the ugly side of the group, not the union.

Last edited by Sink r8; 09-01-2013 at 07:27 AM.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 09-01-2013, 07:27 AM
  #138470  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Denny Crane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Kickin’ Back
Posts: 6,971
Default

Scoop and Jay5150,

First of all I'm sorry you guys ended up getting furloughed, it sucked.

Here is how I remember it. Yes guys were flying green slips while you were out on furlough. I don't think they should have been doing it. Unfortunately there is that pesky "status quo" thingy with the NMB and we had the 49ers to prove that Delta would come after the Union and individuals in court to enforce this. I think there is at least one of them that frequents this forum. He could tell you more.

That being said, I pretty sure the price of a green slip from 2X to 1.5X and the "Furlough Protection Letter" were a result of the side letter of agreement (46 I think) that took effect in Nov. 2004 to try to avoid bankruptcy. At the time I thought it was essentially a new contract. The "Furlough Protection Letter" was a casualty of the Bankruptcy process. One thing I would like to know, if we have/had such great lawyers, why didn't they know the "Furlough Protection Letter" wasn't worth the paper it was written on.

The following is not aimed at you guys, it's just my feelings. This is all behind us and I choose to look forward rather than dwell in the past. I know that "those who don't remember the past are doomed to repeat it." I'm all for trying to correct the inequities of the contract and hopefully we will. I am very optimistic about the future of our Company and what we should be able to negotiate in our next contract.

And like someone else said, I'm very thankful that, after 25 years, I STILL ENJOY GOING TO WORK! (Granted, we would all like to be independently wealthy and not have to work!) I know most all, if not all, of you out there in APC Land can say the same thing. That's a testament to this pilot group. Truthfully, how many people in other industries can honestly say that they enjoy going to work?

I'll get off the soapbox now. Move along, nothing to see here.....

Denny

Last edited by Denny Crane; 09-01-2013 at 07:41 AM.
Denny Crane is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices