Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
You never thought you'd lose your pension either, age 65, 700 DCI a/c, multiple JVs, etc...
The article is just proof of what will be a growing sentiment for "change." I reached my conclusion well before reading the article. Ask your average passenger if they would like more competition if it resulted in lower airfares.
Capacity restraint is driving airfares higher (which is a good thing) but the public--the politicians' constituents--eventually are going to demand cabotage. Most don't know the meaning of the term, but make no mistake--the majority will be for it for the promise of lower airfares.
Who/what is going to stop Emirates, Ethiad, and others from flying point to point in the U.S.? If $ talks---and it does---who is going to win the money battle, ALPA PAC or the guys sitting on top of billions of barrels of oil?
The article is just proof of what will be a growing sentiment for "change." I reached my conclusion well before reading the article. Ask your average passenger if they would like more competition if it resulted in lower airfares.
Capacity restraint is driving airfares higher (which is a good thing) but the public--the politicians' constituents--eventually are going to demand cabotage. Most don't know the meaning of the term, but make no mistake--the majority will be for it for the promise of lower airfares.
Who/what is going to stop Emirates, Ethiad, and others from flying point to point in the U.S.? If $ talks---and it does---who is going to win the money battle, ALPA PAC or the guys sitting on top of billions of barrels of oil?
The reality is the train has nearly left the station on cabotage, it's a matter of time. My advice to young guys at the regionals is to abandon conventional wisdom and thought, open your horizons. If upgrades to WB CA are five to eight years, that would put one in the drivers seat should a foreign carrier ever open a US base. Or you could come to DL, live in ATL, DTW or NYC flying narrow bodies. Or UAL/CAL or AMR/US and deal with that fallout.
Don't get me wrong, I'm lucky to be at DL considering the other options, but I am also forward thinking enough to realize the game will continue to change. Expecting a 20-35 year career without considering the change ahead is foolish.
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
The majors have their own PAC, Airlines For America (A4A). Sometimes we are aligned with their interests.
in my humble opinion, allowing foriegn an ownership of a strategic asset indicates the United States is no longer a superpower.
in my humble opinion, allowing foriegn an ownership of a strategic asset indicates the United States is no longer a superpower.
And with this DOJ, even if you don't pass a law they could just decide not to uphold a law if it's in their political interests. So we may or may not have cabotage right now as we are a nation of discretionary laws.
So you got up this morning and read the news of the day and saw something about Miley Cirus' dry sex acts on a music video show or something. And you, like me, may have learned a new word - twerking.
What is twerking?
Twerking:
go cat go.
What is twerking?
Twerking:
go cat go.
Football transcends politics or airline affiliation. The only thing you could possibly say that would offend me would be "Go gaytors". I would hunt you down and make sure you never got hired here. I'm sure that at some point we will play down there in College Station. I am looking forward to a small stadium venue.
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Great point and sums up why I can't understand the association signing off on this vague language. I have flown with enough pilots who are sick and try to fool everyone, including themselves, unsuccessfully. I don't just mean physically sick. How many guys fly while they are preoccupied with a dying parent, sick child, divorce, financial problems etc...? Those pilots are not mentally fit and have a legitimate psychological reason to avoid the cockpit. These mental situations are much more of a threat in my experience than mild physical ailments which may be easy to "verify." This policy change will only exacerbate the problem of flying while sick, especially the most dangerous that can't be "verified." I would argue the definition of sick be expanded and more emphasis be placed on calling in sick by our association.
I am aware that the company may or may not have viewed some of these circumstances as "sick" even prior to this contract. However, this action of "verification" will push more pilots to the cockpit, whereas prior to C2012, better judgement would have prevailed. IMO, this makes the operation less safe, which runs counter to the primary mission statement of our association.
A phone call by itself is punitive. It says "I don't trust you." You should not have your integrity challenged for calling in sick. This policy has not been thought through on either side of the table and should be changed asap.
I am aware that the company may or may not have viewed some of these circumstances as "sick" even prior to this contract. However, this action of "verification" will push more pilots to the cockpit, whereas prior to C2012, better judgement would have prevailed. IMO, this makes the operation less safe, which runs counter to the primary mission statement of our association.
A phone call by itself is punitive. It says "I don't trust you." You should not have your integrity challenged for calling in sick. This policy has not been thought through on either side of the table and should be changed asap.
These reasons are EXACTLY why we have the PAN, or Pilot Assistance Network. If someone is dealing with these issues, & feels unfit to fly then that person should have ZERO hesitation to call in sick. Then immediately follow that with a call to the PAN. Utilize the resources your union gives you.
There are many ways to reduce demand for new pilots. Mergers, JVs, foreign ownership, cabotage, productivity, changes (or elimination entirely) of the retirement age, changes in FARs, and so on. It's already happened and will continue to happen even more.
As to the supply side, at last check we share the planet with over 7 BILLION other folks. I'm sure enough can be found to fill the coming "pilot shortage."
If you are tying your hopes and dreams of a larger paycheck on supply/demand, you are going to be very disappointed.
DAL reported over $1B in profits last year and is projected to be even more profitable this year. All the while we're still paid LESS $ than rates negotiated a DECADE ago!
I think there are 4 or maybe 5 SEC schools that are closer to Memphis than is Knoxville. It has one of the best recruiting environments in the state, and is one of the hardest for UT to recruit from...
Oh, and as to the gator thingy... ugh.... but at least you recognize it is a move... up
Straight QOL, homie
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
We've been hearing about a "looming pilot shortage" for 20+ years. It hasn't materialized yet. If it ever does, there are PLENTY of ways to deal with it. While you'd like management's answer to be higher pay (and so would I), that's just pure fantasy.
There are many ways to reduce demand for new pilots. Mergers, JVs, foreign ownership, cabotage, productivity, changes (or elimination entirely) of the retirement age, changes in FARs, and so on. It's already happened and will continue to happen even more.
As to the supply side, at last check we share the planet with over 7 BILLION other folks. I'm sure enough can be found to fill the coming "pilot shortage."
If you are tying your hopes and dreams of a larger paycheck on supply/demand, you are going to be very disappointed.
DAL reported over $1B in profits last year and is projected to be even more profitable this year. All the while we're still paid LESS $ than rates negotiated a DECADE ago!
There are many ways to reduce demand for new pilots. Mergers, JVs, foreign ownership, cabotage, productivity, changes (or elimination entirely) of the retirement age, changes in FARs, and so on. It's already happened and will continue to happen even more.
As to the supply side, at last check we share the planet with over 7 BILLION other folks. I'm sure enough can be found to fill the coming "pilot shortage."
If you are tying your hopes and dreams of a larger paycheck on supply/demand, you are going to be very disappointed.
DAL reported over $1B in profits last year and is projected to be even more profitable this year. All the while we're still paid LESS $ than rates negotiated a DECADE ago!
I think the demand for pilots will be there and it will be satisfied by increasing the retirement age again (ugh) and when prospective pilots see the rewards of the career as worth the massive effort it takes to get there.
Last edited by Hawaii50; 08-26-2013 at 10:57 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post