Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Straight QOL, homie
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
But hey, ALPA did negotiate with the company to make it easier for themselves to schedule their Flight Pay Loss and other ALPA business. So ALPA dealt itself a straight, and the line pilots get a queen high again.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 5-9 block, kill removing
Posts: 385
I don't know you personally, but I would wager that you as an individual are trustworthy and would keep the data confidential. It's about something much bigger than each of our individual curiosities.
We see things differently, which is normal in a large group of people with different perspectives. I'd prefer that knowledge be held as closely as possible. I get to nominate, campaign, and vote for the pilot I think will best represent me, and I trust them to do that job; I I am dissatisfied I retain the ability to try and recall that rep.
We are constantly playing poker through a proxy... I don't want the other team to know the important strategies and what our throw-away items are. YMMV.
We see things differently, which is normal in a large group of people with different perspectives. I'd prefer that knowledge be held as closely as possible. I get to nominate, campaign, and vote for the pilot I think will best represent me, and I trust them to do that job; I I am dissatisfied I retain the ability to try and recall that rep.
We are constantly playing poker through a proxy... I don't want the other team to know the important strategies and what our throw-away items are. YMMV.
I don't know you personally either, but I know enough to be able to trust you with the survey results.
BTW, my throwaway items get thrown out prior to the survey. And I'm not sure you need to have Bud Fox on the inside to know we want something that smells like C2000.
I guess we do see things differently.
Runs with scissors
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,730
Shiz,
Serious Question (for any and all):
Will the next negotiating team again trade larger regional jets (or more of them) for pay rates (admittedly with the approval of the Delta pilots)? Or will they (the negotiating team, and/or the MEC, and/or the Delta pilot group) hold the line on scope? Would Delta buy a 100 seat aircraft in significant numbers if it was operated by Delta pilots?
Curious as to others' thoughts...
Serious Question (for any and all):
Will the next negotiating team again trade larger regional jets (or more of them) for pay rates (admittedly with the approval of the Delta pilots)? Or will they (the negotiating team, and/or the MEC, and/or the Delta pilot group) hold the line on scope? Would Delta buy a 100 seat aircraft in significant numbers if it was operated by Delta pilots?
Curious as to others' thoughts...
Here's what Leo the CEO said to my In Command class, back in about summer of 2001, (prior to 9-11) r.e. RJ's.
The conversation started with him speaking about the importance of Customer Service. It was pointed out to him, by a Captain in the class, that all those Delta RJ's were providing Substandard Customer Service. Many others jumped in, with horror stories about ASA's pizz poor performance down there on Course C.
Leo's answer was, "We know there's a problem on Concourse C, but we can't get any good help for $10/hr. and there's a lot of turnover." etc.
Then someone asked him why Mainline Pilots couldn't be flying the RJ's, and if that would improve the ops. etc.
Leo's answer was, "We can't afford to let you fly them, even if you flew them at the exact same pay rates we are paying ASA's Pilots, because Delta pays you a 30% override for your health and retirement benefits."
So...what's changed since 2001?
Well, we went bankrupt, our pay has been slashed back to 1996 levels, we lost our retirements, and we pay a bunch out of pocket for our medical insurance, so we must be more 'cost competitive' with the RJ pilots today, than we were then.
In fact, I think that's part of the reason you are seeing the 50 seaters go away, and we are getting the 717's, because we are more cost competitive at that end of the scale. Will we as a group vote to outsource the 100 seater? I'm betting we aren't that stupid, but I've been wrong before on scope sales, too many times, unfortunately.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Permanently scarred
Posts: 1,707
Do you show your cards and tell everyone what your strategy is after each hand of poker when you'll be playing against the same opponent every week? That doesn't seem like a very smart thing to do!
You really want to see the polling data? Get involved and elected to be a local rep.... Or be active enough to make sure the pilot you elect is accurately reflecting the pilot group!
You really want to see the polling data? Get involved and elected to be a local rep.... Or be active enough to make sure the pilot you elect is accurately reflecting the pilot group!
BTW, what was our opener? Seriously, was that released--showing my ignorance as to whether or not that's old news. I'm pretty sure the other side has seen those cards.
Shiz,
Thanks for your response. I don't want to turn this into a pi**ing contest, but I did want to respond to the part of your post I quoted above.
I don't know when you came aboard, but back before 9/11 Delta alone had 10,000 pilots on it's seniority list. The huge growth in the number of regional pilots was at the direct expense of Delta pilots (and pilots at other mainline carriers).
Call me selfish, but I'm more concerned about my fellow Delta pilots than the jobs of regional pilots, be they ALPA members or not.
Serious Question (for any and all):
My nephew emailed me and asked: Do have any idea what the future of the 100-seaters is going to be? I know the Japanese and Russians are trying to re-enter the aerospace market, plus there is the new Bombardier plane. I'd imagine that there would be a decent market for planes in size between a CRJ700 & an A319?
I briefly explained the scope clause concept, and the history over the last 20 years of ever larger size, and numbers of, regional jets being operated by non-mainline carriers. But where's it go from here? Will the next negotiating team again trade larger regional jets (or more of them) for pay rates (admittedly with the approval of the Delta pilots)? Or will they (the negotiating team, and/or the MEC, and/or the Delta pilot group) hold the line on scope? Would Delta buy a 100 seat aircraft in significant numbers if it was operated by Delta pilots?
Curious as to others' thoughts...
Thanks for your response. I don't want to turn this into a pi**ing contest, but I did want to respond to the part of your post I quoted above.
I don't know when you came aboard, but back before 9/11 Delta alone had 10,000 pilots on it's seniority list. The huge growth in the number of regional pilots was at the direct expense of Delta pilots (and pilots at other mainline carriers).
Call me selfish, but I'm more concerned about my fellow Delta pilots than the jobs of regional pilots, be they ALPA members or not.
Serious Question (for any and all):
My nephew emailed me and asked: Do have any idea what the future of the 100-seaters is going to be? I know the Japanese and Russians are trying to re-enter the aerospace market, plus there is the new Bombardier plane. I'd imagine that there would be a decent market for planes in size between a CRJ700 & an A319?
I briefly explained the scope clause concept, and the history over the last 20 years of ever larger size, and numbers of, regional jets being operated by non-mainline carriers. But where's it go from here? Will the next negotiating team again trade larger regional jets (or more of them) for pay rates (admittedly with the approval of the Delta pilots)? Or will they (the negotiating team, and/or the MEC, and/or the Delta pilot group) hold the line on scope? Would Delta buy a 100 seat aircraft in significant numbers if it was operated by Delta pilots?
Curious as to others' thoughts...
I'd like to know how much of the reduction of DAL seniority list related to the parking of all the 3-man aircraft? I don't know how big the "sidesaddle categories" were, and what the main line fleet sizes were, along with overall fleet makeup (did some fleets get parked and not replaced? .....Before my time;-)
Additionally, how much pilot growth happened from market share (and by extension pilot jobs) being siphoned away from legacy airlines during that decade by JB/AT/SW (airlines with the massively under-compensated pilots who often made 25-40% less than at the airlines who managed to maintain higher levels of compensation) until bankrputcy forced a massive backslide.
I think there is a much greater correlation between those factors than by RJ's, but RJ growth did play a role, and we as a group fell for the trade. It was a mistake, and hindsight is 20/20.
I am concerned about the piloting profession as a whole, and I am extremely concerned about the careers of the Delta Pilots, and without a strong profession we won't have very good career prospects.
I am confident that through ALPA our reps and NC are firmly committed to holding the line at 76, and recapturing botom end (amd top end) scope when the opportunity presents itself. Anything else is a non-starter.
It is my personal opinion that the "commuter" industry is probably going to collapse on its own when the 1500 rule, FTDT and hiring by the majors begins in earnest.
I would love to see it all come in house, but I'm MUCH MUCH more concerned about the gulf carrier and the "Norwegian Air Shuttle" type business model screwing up our future, and we are VERY screwed if that model is permitted to proliferate.
But next time, quality will not be sacrified for expediency, just like this time, right?
I don't know you personally either, but I know enough to be able to trust you with the survey results.
BTW, my throwaway items get thrown out prior to the survey. And I'm not sure you need to have Bud Fox on the inside to know we want something that smells like C2000.
I guess we do see things differently.
BTW, my throwaway items get thrown out prior to the survey. And I'm not sure you need to have Bud Fox on the inside to know we want something that smells like C2000.
I guess we do see things differently.
We do agree that getting back toward C2K is the goal, but I think a pre-determined JPWA, followed by an SOT and TOT, followed by an early PWA, coupled with a very short duration; then a couple of scope opportunities, sandwiched with a way to leverage improvements in FTDT, followed by the next round of Sect. 6 has made a LOT of progress in 5-7 years!
Saying "NO" to everything over the last 5-7 years 'felt' realt satisfying but has/had it benefitted AA, LCC, UAL pilots?
I vote for the first method... "Enjoying" the Letter 51 days for an extra 5-6 years while saying no to anything except C2K immediately would have gained us ZERO.
Want in one hand and $&1t in the other and tell me which one fills up first. YMMV
So yes, we disagree on how to get results and improvements.
Like many of my peers, I'm confident my WANT list is way beyond my reasonable expectation list... Logic dictates that you don't want to undershoot the available leverage, that is the measure of acceptability in my opinion. By a 19-5 margin (21-5 if you wanted to count the MEM reps who had lost their LEC less than a month before the TA), it was determined by the MEC that the leverage had been used to the limit, and that it was up to the pilots to then take the information and decide whether it was acceptable.
I think that more restoration is likely and will happen more quickly when the Company is consistently profitable and we don't have so many of our peers dragging the wages down.
Last edited by shiznit; 08-21-2013 at 02:09 PM. Reason: Spelling
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post