Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2013, 11:29 AM
  #136361  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by AlaskaBound
Open Skies and Skymark

This is an unsettling trend. I'm a regional pilot trying to get to the majors. I have literally been stuck at my carrier as an FO for 6 years without any forward movement whatsoever. I know you guys spend a lot of time working on shrinking the DCI lift and shifting it to mainline flying. In theory that creates mainline jobs and I like the direction you're going. However, I don't see quite the urgency to go after these JVs and codeshare agreements with huge international carriers.

... Do you see any collaborative movement within DALPA to get this under control? With that said, I know the pilots don't run the company and can't tell the company how to run the business. But just as DALPA has been successful, relatively, in bring back domestic flying to mainline, they can also focus on slowing down these agreements.
You must be new to this thread. To answer your question, "yes." Our pilot group is on the leading edge of JV scope management. Basically, our contract requires management to use Delta pilots to fly our share of any new production which might be created via Joint Venture.

I think such broad based language is terrific because we draw a circle around everything (other than permitted exceptions) and state, "that's ours."

If you are interested there is an ALPA Council 44 meeting at the Holiday Inn, Virginia Ave., at 11am tomorrow where the guest speaker is among the foremost experts on JV's anywhere. LEC meetings are usually open to guests. You're welcome to pull up a chair, munch on a cookie and learn something.

If you are "Alaska Bound," have you read their scope language with regard to "Alaska Air Group." They failed to bind their holding company to anything other than their current and ordered 737 fleet. In other words, they drew their circle really small, just around a fleet specific operation. Our Circle is any flying by Delta, or for Delta.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 07-31-2013 at 11:45 AM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 11:29 AM
  #136362  
Gets Weekends Off
 
redship's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: MD FO
Posts: 107
Default

Delta Adds New Service to Aspen - Yahoo! Finance

Delta announces seasonal service to Aspen w daily flights from ATL and Saturday service from MSP... In rj's
redship is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 11:49 AM
  #136363  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Just another RJ guy
Posts: 906
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Really? Do you read this thread, much?

IMHO our pilot group is on the leading edge of JV scope management. We have Joint Venture protections in our PWA which force the Company to balance any new production with Delta pilots.

If you are "Alaska Bound," have you read their scope language with regard to "Alaska Air Group." They failed to bind their holding company to anything other than their current and ordered 737 fleet.
I don't read this message board every day but what I do see is the day to day ops out on the line. I see Air France bringing in an A340 in to Minneapolis now. I just wish I saw a Delta A330 instead doing 2 flights a day out of MSP-CDG. I wish I saw Delta B767-400 doing JFK-LHR instead of Virgin. The list goes on and on. It's just an observation...nothing else. I don't mean to hit a sensitive spot with you guys I just wanted to see what was going on on that front.

Thanks for the info on the scope you guys have in your contract. I don't have access to your full contract so I'm not sure of details.

I don't really have time to read all 136,370 pages of posts. I hope you guys can continue to recapture the WB flying now that you've seemed to get a grip on the regional outsourcing.

No I'm not Alaska Airlines bound. Not what my username implies.
AlaskaBound is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 11:50 AM
  #136364  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,197
Default

RJs and turboprops are the only planes that fit there.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 11:51 AM
  #136365  
Doing Nothing
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,316
Default

Can anyone else see the AE results? They are gone off DNet.
cni187 is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 11:53 AM
  #136366  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
Yes, absolutely to #1. I've done it several times. You just have to have adequate coverage on the day that you want to drop.

For #2, I think you can, but I've never tried it. My understanding is it works like a PD or APD. I think you only get paid for the day you drop though, and no soft credit, so the obvious thought would be to drop the highest hard-time day.
Thank you!
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 11:59 AM
  #136367  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Just another RJ guy
Posts: 906
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
You must be new to this thread. To answer your question, "yes." Our pilot group is on the leading edge of JV scope management. Basically, our contract requires management to use Delta pilots to fly our share of any new production which might be created via Joint Venture.

I think such broad based language is terrific because we draw a circle around everything (other than permitted exceptions) and state, "that's ours."

If you are interested there is an ALPA Council 44 meeting at the Holiday Inn, Virginia Ave., at 11am tomorrow where the guest speaker is among the foremost experts on JV's anywhere. LEC meetings are usually open to guests. You're welcome to pull up a chair, munch on a cookie and learn something.

If you are "Alaska Bound," have you read their scope language with regard to "Alaska Air Group." They failed to bind their holding company to anything other than their current and ordered 737 fleet. In other words, they drew their circle really small, just around a fleet specific operation. Our Circle is any flying by Delta, or for Delta.
Thank you for the explanation and information. It sounds like you made improvements in your latest contract and I hope it continues...as I'm sure all Delta pilots and guys wanting to go to Delta hope. I would absolutely show up at one of those meetings if I didn't have to work at my other job...retail. The bills are stacking up! Does the LEC have monthly meetings?
AlaskaBound is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 12:09 PM
  #136368  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by AlaskaBound
Thanks for the info on the scope you guys have in your contract. I don't have access to your full contract so I'm not sure of details.
With regard to your examples: (really simplified version, so folks don't whack me with 1.5% windows )

Air France/KLM/Alitalia JV: We get half of the EASK. An EASK is a number which takes into account the passenger and cargo capacity of the operation by kilometers, meaning an A380 equals several 767's. If you were in Seattle you would see a Delta 767 going to Paris making it's share of EASK's. We typically have a one year measurement window to allow management to flex for seasonal demand patterns.

There has been a lot written here about the fact that Air France is not in balance. We grew our share when Alitalia joined the JV and expanded the window to three years. Due to a number of factors we've not yet caught up with our half. We're working on it.

Other JV's: We will not decrease flying year on year and our share is 75% of the Company's share of revenue flying.

LEC meetings are quarterly to the best of my knowledge.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 12:40 PM
  #136369  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Default

Originally Posted by maddogmax
Base swapping would be fine if the two would agree to swap seniority numbers.
That would be awesome if able to do. Lets just say that there would be a whole lotta early retirements.
Columbia is offline  
Old 07-31-2013, 02:57 PM
  #136370  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Just another RJ guy
Posts: 906
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
With regard to your examples: (really simplified version, so folks don't whack me with 1.5% windows )

Air France/KLM/Alitalia JV: We get half of the EASK. An EASK is a number which takes into account the passenger and cargo capacity of the operation by kilometers, meaning an A380 equals several 767's. If you were in Seattle you would see a Delta 767 going to Paris making it's share of EASK's. We typically have a one year measurement window to allow management to flex for seasonal demand patterns.

There has been a lot written here about the fact that Air France is not in balance. We grew our share when Alitalia joined the JV and expanded the window to three years. Due to a number of factors we've not yet caught up with our half. We're working on it.


Other JV's: We will not decrease flying year on year and our share is 75% of the Company's share of revenue flying.

LEC meetings are quarterly to the best of my knowledge.
Thanks for the info and clarification. Good to see things are improving.
AlaskaBound is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices