Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2013, 09:47 PM
  #134321  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
From June 2012 to 2013 there were 74 fewer Captains. You were told that the staffing efficiencies would net net save the Company about 125 jobs or about 62 captain jobs. Now 62 seems pretty close to 74. You were also told that the efficiencies would cycle in before the 717's arrived. So yes, that was a concession, but I believe a concession that was well spelled out to the pilot group during the TA discussion.
What about the captains who retired due to the early retirement program? How do they fit into your equation?
newKnow is offline  
Old 07-05-2013, 02:50 AM
  #134322  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
I think I've heard this said in more than a few interviews: Delta is an investment vehicle. If you convince investors that you have a stable and happy employee group, you get more of them to invest more money, which in the long run makes all the investors happy. Show, investors that you got employees to sign off on a deal that had small pay raises and concessions in it when your company was making record profits, the investors are ecstatic.

Smart move on their part.
Which is the leverage I think we should use on the AF JV. Tell management ALPA is going to the press. Who wants to invest in an airline with "labor problem$" ?
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 07-05-2013, 03:31 AM
  #134323  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MoonShot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,057
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
alfa,

Are you really bragging that we got an early retirement program that the rest of the employees got the previous year? In my book, it was an epic fail that we didn't get the program with the other employees, then bought off on the the proposition that it was a "gift" included to sweeten the new contract.
+1. I was going to write pretty much the same thing.
MoonShot is offline  
Old 07-05-2013, 03:33 AM
  #134324  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus
They couldn't, they needed you to sign off on more jumbo RJ outsourcing to keep the DCI plantation system alive and making them money. You came through for them, and didn't insist on much in the way of raises, partly offset by a decrease in profit sharing, so they gave you a contract early. Turns out all you need to do to get an early contract is sell out the next generation of pilots in exchange for single-digit raises! Silly SWA pilots, why didn't they think of that....
Guess you still haven't learned.......
Rather B Fishin is offline  
Old 07-05-2013, 03:55 AM
  #134325  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
alfa,

Are you really bragging that we got an early retirement program that the rest of the employees got the previous year? In my book, it was an epic fail that we didn't get the program with the other employees, then bought off on the the proposition that it was a "gift" included to sweeten the new contract. Just like the "gifts" of the 717 and retired 50 seat RJ's. Oh, and my favorite, the max of 14 hours of duty for short call reserve.

When I buy my kids sweaters and school supplies for Christmas, they know the deal (we were going to get them those things anyway.) Why don't we?
+1

Let's not even mention the 5% cut in profit sharing to "help" fund the raises. Anyone else have a problem with this?
DeadHead is offline  
Old 07-05-2013, 04:26 AM
  #134326  
Weekend and Holiday Pilot
 
Doug Masters's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Sippin' at the Troubadour
Posts: 1,142
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
+1

Let's not even mention the 5% cut in profit sharing to "help" fund the raises. Anyone else have a problem with this?
That was one of the reasons I was a "no" voter. One of many reasons.
Doug Masters is offline  
Old 07-05-2013, 05:05 AM
  #134327  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
+1

Let's not even mention the 5% cut in profit sharing to "help" fund the raises. Anyone else have a problem with this?
I'm pretty much a Doubting Thomas in regards to anything DALPA. I have never voted yes for a contract. I didn't have a problem with this item.

As an hourly wage worker, I'm no manager, I want my money every month. I don't really care if the Company makes a small profit or a large profit. It's really none of my business. Did I say I'm not a manager? I show up. I do my job. I go home.

Here is my point: Replacing uncertain profit sharing with a regular wage was not a problem for me. I don't think profit incentives are useful for a non-management, hourly wage worker.
orvil is offline  
Old 07-05-2013, 05:24 AM
  #134328  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,028
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
I assume you'll turn down the flow since you think so little of your future co-workers??? We're all a bunch of rollovers with no spine eh?

Here's a better idea: Thank us when your turn comes up and you watch DCI shrink from your 717 seat. You WILL have to get used to flying 45 minute legs, 5 times a day! Hope you're not above it
You need to accept that we moved the line in scope allowing more large rj's again. We can't fix the problem until we admit that we have a problem. Our small raises were funded by this. Junglebus is watching the 50 seaters at the regionals disappear and get replaced by 70 seaters. This is now happening at American and United thanks to us.
hockeypilot44 is online now  
Old 07-05-2013, 05:27 AM
  #134329  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,028
Default

Originally Posted by orvil
I'm pretty much a Doubting Thomas in regards to anything DALPA. I have never voted yes for a contract. I didn't have a problem with this item.

As an hourly wage worker, I'm no manager, I want my money every month. I don't really care if the Company makes a small profit or a large profit. It's really none of my business. Did I say I'm not a manager? I show up. I do my job. I go home.

Here is my point: Replacing uncertain profit sharing with a regular wage was not a problem for me. I don't think profit incentives are useful for a non-management, hourly wage worker.
I agree with you. I had no problem with this part. I don't think ALPA should have included this money in the raise percentage when they were selling us the contract.
hockeypilot44 is online now  
Old 07-05-2013, 05:46 AM
  #134330  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
alfa,

Are you really bragging that we got an early retirement program that the rest of the employees got the previous year?
not to mention that ALPA grossly overestimated the number of early-out takers while pushing the TA on us.
Purple Drank is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices