Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Carl
![Carl Spackler is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I spoke at length with one of the negotiators. ... One thing I really find a odd comment form junior pilots is that they cite how well the company is doing as something that is wrong. Yet the fact the company is doing well will benefit them far more then the senior pilots over time.
Time to take a long break from the giant pity party that has become this forum. I check back in 3 years from now and we will see who's version of the future was more correct.
Time to take a long break from the giant pity party that has become this forum. I check back in 3 years from now and we will see who's version of the future was more correct.
This board would be awfully dull if there was no back and forth. I hope Sailing sticks around.
It scares me when folks like SlowPlay go underground ... makes me wonder what they are up to.
![](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_KfUlhrCsF2w/TSELyXg-UGI/AAAAAAAABQA/rwjIqoFph7Q/s1600/big+lebowski.jpg)
![Bucking Bar is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Jury will come back and ask if they can give the defendant money from the plaintiff.
![Bucking Bar is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Not even sailingfud himself agrees with you Bar.
Can't figure out why you bend over backwards to give the benefit of the doubt to the stalwart DALPA apologists. ![Confused](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Carl
![Confused](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Carl
![Carl Spackler is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have a different perspective with respect to Sailing. I don't think he's an apologist per se. I believe he believes what he says. I don't think he is fed talking points to spout off.
I agree with Bar, I hope he sticks around. I like his input.
Now, another topic is why he believes what he says given evidence to the contrary.
Slow and Alfa were spindoctors plain and simple. Sailing is a true believer.
![scambo1 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As you point out, ALPA uses information tactically. Of course, there is a lot they can't talk about. Sometimes crew room briefings include the open discussion of information that ALPA considers to be non disclosed.
![Bucking Bar is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 115
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
FWIW, my Reps gave me the same report Sailing gave us. I just asked some questions to confirm what I had already heard. Sailing's report certainly passes the test as credible.
This board would be awfully dull if there was no back and forth. I hope Sailing sticks around.
It scares me when folks like SlowPlay go underground ... makes me wonder what they are up to.
![](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_KfUlhrCsF2w/TSELyXg-UGI/AAAAAAAABQA/rwjIqoFph7Q/s1600/big+lebowski.jpg)
This board would be awfully dull if there was no back and forth. I hope Sailing sticks around.
It scares me when folks like SlowPlay go underground ... makes me wonder what they are up to.
![](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_KfUlhrCsF2w/TSELyXg-UGI/AAAAAAAABQA/rwjIqoFph7Q/s1600/big+lebowski.jpg)
![Wink](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Sobchak is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And what makes you so sure the agragate composite LGBP wouldn't be dumbing down of the current agragate pay rates based on type?
I have done calculations. Most would win big. Especially newbies. They would blow out of the water what most of us already on property will wind up with.
Also how much productivity on a permantly decreased head count would we be conceding?
That is up to management. Just like today. We have zero input on how many city pairs they choose to fly, and with what equipment they choose to fly 'em. None of that is relevant to the discussion at hand.
A further concern with LGBP is it would incentify WB outsourcing.
Don't care. A 25 year captain will make the same coin if he is flying a 717 or 747, but again, equipment is up to management.
Some might say who cares so long as we get paid what a WB does which is questionable to begin with, but as soon as we become domestic feed for outsourced international on the top and jumbo shrimp RJ's on the bottom we could be facilitating serious staffing surpluses.
So you would rather cover 8 or 10 time zones when you are 63 years old to make the big bucks than fly turnarounds and be home every night? You have big shiny jet syndrome. Unfortunately, DAL doesn't have very many of them, and never will.
It's not just pay, but also growth and the ability to upgrade. LGBP is fine as long as I've got mine and don't think I'm going any further.
Upgrade time will be what it is no matter what the payscale. That will have little bearing on it. What WILL affect it will be the fact that every category will become "thicker" at the top wrt seniority. I concede that, but upgrade time will be what it is no matter what. If there are no retirements or growth, there will be stagnation. But with LGBP, at least you know that you will be getting mo money next year.. and the year after.. and...
I have done calculations. Most would win big. Especially newbies. They would blow out of the water what most of us already on property will wind up with.
Also how much productivity on a permantly decreased head count would we be conceding?
That is up to management. Just like today. We have zero input on how many city pairs they choose to fly, and with what equipment they choose to fly 'em. None of that is relevant to the discussion at hand.
A further concern with LGBP is it would incentify WB outsourcing.
Don't care. A 25 year captain will make the same coin if he is flying a 717 or 747, but again, equipment is up to management.
Some might say who cares so long as we get paid what a WB does which is questionable to begin with, but as soon as we become domestic feed for outsourced international on the top and jumbo shrimp RJ's on the bottom we could be facilitating serious staffing surpluses.
So you would rather cover 8 or 10 time zones when you are 63 years old to make the big bucks than fly turnarounds and be home every night? You have big shiny jet syndrome. Unfortunately, DAL doesn't have very many of them, and never will.
It's not just pay, but also growth and the ability to upgrade. LGBP is fine as long as I've got mine and don't think I'm going any further.
Upgrade time will be what it is no matter what the payscale. That will have little bearing on it. What WILL affect it will be the fact that every category will become "thicker" at the top wrt seniority. I concede that, but upgrade time will be what it is no matter what. If there are no retirements or growth, there will be stagnation. But with LGBP, at least you know that you will be getting mo money next year.. and the year after.. and...
![tsquare is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,576
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Holy sheet! I agree with BB.
FWIW, my Reps gave me the same report Sailing gave us. I just asked some questions to confirm what I had already heard. Sailing's report certainly passes the test as credible.
This board would be awfully dull if there was no back and forth. I hope Sailing sticks around.
It scares me when folks like SlowPlay go underground ... makes me wonder what they are up to.
![](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_KfUlhrCsF2w/TSELyXg-UGI/AAAAAAAABQA/rwjIqoFph7Q/s1600/big+lebowski.jpg)
This board would be awfully dull if there was no back and forth. I hope Sailing sticks around.
It scares me when folks like SlowPlay go underground ... makes me wonder what they are up to.
![](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_KfUlhrCsF2w/TSELyXg-UGI/AAAAAAAABQA/rwjIqoFph7Q/s1600/big+lebowski.jpg)
![NERD is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
![Bucking Bar is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post