Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
![Carl Spackler is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,415
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
There is also no question that by voting YES based on this sentiment, we've shown management that we're unwilling to risk Section 6 negotiations. Even a cost neutral contract is preferable to risking anything in negotiations.
It'll be very difficult to live down this reputation of fear and weakness that we've built in front of management.
Carl
It'll be very difficult to live down this reputation of fear and weakness that we've built in front of management.
Carl
Your tirade against DALPA started the day the SLI award was made public. I tend to think there is a relationship.
![sailingfun is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![](http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3426/3362672479_10f30e2797_o.jpg)
and then all of a sudden going mad when it was released.
I would say it was heated here. There were a lot of issues. The you vs me was an issue. The SLI was. LM was. Future union leadership was. Flight ops direction was. Union motive was.
But after a while the you vs me and the SLI dissipated into the background not only here but on the line [may be not off line though] and people moved on.
But the other stuff festered. And it wasn't just DALN pilots who festered, it was DALS too. It was there before the merger and I know it was because my TOE out of JFK was nothing but anti-DALPA and anti-LM rants by the LCA and relief pilot in 2008. A good number of DALS pilots shared something in common with DALN and the DPA grew for a while. And grew very large in none other than ATL.
I think to say this is all SLI related isn't accurate.
Last edited by forgot to bid; 05-22-2013 at 05:29 PM. Reason: everything but the picture.
![forgot to bid is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And you know our DTW, MSP and SEA reps (aka DALPA) specifically stated that this TA would be cost neutral. It was all in writing, yet you say nobody from management or DALPA ever said it. Why do you do this? Do you think it enhances your credibility? Are you just forgetful?
Carl
![Carl Spackler is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Carl
![Carl Spackler is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,958
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We are the only employee group not back to pre-bankruptcy wages not counting inflation. Every single employee that we work with other than us is back to where they were. Think about that.
![hockeypilot44 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You say this even though you know Mike Campbell (Delta management) said this prior to the TA being ratified: "The fleet changes provided by this agreement, coupled with the productivity and profit sharing changes, cover the investments in our employees."
And you know our DTW, MSP and SEA reps (aka DALPA) specifically stated that this TA would be cost neutral. It was all in writing, yet you say nobody from management or DALPA ever said it. Why do you do this? Do you think it enhances your credibility? Are you just forgetful?
Carl
And you know our DTW, MSP and SEA reps (aka DALPA) specifically stated that this TA would be cost neutral. It was all in writing, yet you say nobody from management or DALPA ever said it. Why do you do this? Do you think it enhances your credibility? Are you just forgetful?
Carl
![Flamer is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Da Nile, its more than just a river in Egypt.
![scambo1 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Carl, No one in management or DALPA ever stated the contract was cost neutral. The statement often miss quoted here and by DPA from the company was that they expected the additional revenue generation from the fleet changes to offset the increased costs of the new contract. Total pilot expenses for the company go up substantially with this contract. 400 million the first year and more after that. It remains to be seen if the company can generate the additional revenue they plan since the fleet changes wont really start happening for another year. Regardless trying to tie revenue to the cost of the contract has no relevance. If they offered us all 1 million dollars a year because United and American went out of business and revenue soared would that also be a cost neutral contract? The total cost to Delta to crew their aircraft is going up substantially under this contract.
You're correct that the "cost neutral" comments from management are being misrepresented. The comments/fabrications from the former council 20 reps were addressed during the ratification process. Your recollection of what was said and the context it was stated is accurate.
I agree Jiffy. If you would have told us 8 months ago that we would have:
1. A closed corporate merger agreement with DOJ approval
2. A joint pilot working agreement
3. A combined seniority list
4. A pilot group NOT talking about suing each other but working together, and...
5. All this would happen by December of this year...
I would have thought you and anyone who agreed with you was nuts. In my opinion, this is a real testament to Lee Moak and the Delta MEC, the Northwest MEC, and the adult intellect of most DAL/NWA pilots.
I'm very proud of this group. Very proud indeed!
Carl
1. A closed corporate merger agreement with DOJ approval
2. A joint pilot working agreement
3. A combined seniority list
4. A pilot group NOT talking about suing each other but working together, and...
5. All this would happen by December of this year...
I would have thought you and anyone who agreed with you was nuts. In my opinion, this is a real testament to Lee Moak and the Delta MEC, the Northwest MEC, and the adult intellect of most DAL/NWA pilots.
I'm very proud of this group. Very proud indeed!
Carl
![slowplay is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,415
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Overall Delta's non pilot employee costs are at best industry average. If you count in the fact Delta was able to outsource many of those jobs the costs are probably well below industry average. We are industry leading. If you tried to use a argument about pilot costs verses other employee costs at Delta before the NMB you would look very foolish.
![sailingfun is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post