Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,177
I will say that the current system has had the unexpected result of more junior pilots being able to hold lines as very senior pilots are bidding RSV by choice. That is something that I would have valued greatly when I was a junior commuter always stuck on RSV - now not as much, but it does open up options on down the list. It hasn't been unusual to see REG pilots on the last page of the awards nor RSV pilots on the first page... Just offering up some food for thought. It's simply a different way of doing things. If enough of us hate it then we will make sure it goes back the other way at our next opportunity.
To be clear I'm not defending all aspects of our reserve system. There are many things that need to be fixed. I just find it disingenuous to rail on the negatives while ignoring the upside. Only by understanding the full picture will be able to make sound decisions at our next opportunity, whenever that may be.
Last edited by LeineLodge; 05-20-2013 at 12:30 PM. Reason: Correcting autocorrect
Saw this elsewhere
On Friday, a respected aviation blog called“Operationally Speaking” said research is underway. Boeing and a number of big European manufacturers are reportedly interested.
It would work like this: a co-pilot would be stationed on the ground. That co-pilot would essentially act like the pilot of an unmanned drone. They would be able to take “remote control” of the flight if needed.
It would work like this: a co-pilot would be stationed on the ground. That co-pilot would essentially act like the pilot of an unmanned drone. They would be able to take “remote control” of the flight if needed.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
You assume pay is everything for everyone. Perhaps you misinterpreted the survey results. I think we all know what they said. More money AND More time off. Not one or the other.
Many of us don't want the extra money or the extra pay for flying to ALV +15. We're happy to make a little less money and be around for our kids' ball games in the summer.
During its sales blitz, DALPA lied about the change only affecting "international categories" and that hardly anyone would actually see it.
It's OK, though. You keep using your fuzzy math and telling us about how "we'll get them next time."
Many of us don't want the extra money or the extra pay for flying to ALV +15. We're happy to make a little less money and be around for our kids' ball games in the summer.
During its sales blitz, DALPA lied about the change only affecting "international categories" and that hardly anyone would actually see it.
It's OK, though. You keep using your fuzzy math and telling us about how "we'll get them next time."
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Two things, first read your contract. 8 hours is the limit. Second read and try and understand the new rule. It's likely we will see a increase in 3 man ops because of the severe duty day restrictions on 2 man ops.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
I flew ANC to HNL many times. If they are taking more then 8 hours they are flying it at Mach .4. It's 30 minutes longer then lax to HNL. 2400 verses 2200 miles.
Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,000
Sailing,
I don't think he is aying that DALPA said they would only affect international categories. I believe he is saying that he heard the reason the company wanted this change was because a lot of long trips in the international categories were not assingnable under the old contract.
I have heard that this was the main reason that the company wanted the ALV+15 which begs the question, why didn't we just push to allow ALV+15 in the international categories?
Like I have often posted, I don't think the ALV+15 is a big deal, but the above is a fair question: If the change was mainly to help the schedulers assign longer trips to reserves in the internaitonal categories then why not limit it to the international categories.
And like I said - I too have heard this as the reason the company wanted the change and why we obliged them.
At this point - its done, water under the bridge, make a note of it and lets revisit it next go around, if we as a group decide it is unsat.
Scoop
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
I don't know. Do you have any known absences that month? Will you actually get called for a trip? Would you have yellow highed to get above the cap as I was told on here many pilots often did to be shown full and get a big month?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Sailing,
I don't think he is aying that DALPA said they would only affect international categories. I believe he is saying that he heard the reason the company wanted this change was because a lot of long trips in the international categories were not assingnable under the old contract.
I have heard that this was the main reason that the company wanted the ALV+15 which begs the question, why didn't we just push to allow ALV+15 in the international categories?
Like I have often posted, I don't think the ALV+15 is a big deal, but the above is a fair question: If the change was mainly to help the schedulers assign longer trips to reserves in the internaitonal categories then why not limit it to the international categories.
And like I said - I too have heard this as the reason the company wanted the change and why we obliged them.
At this point - its done, water under the bridge, make a note of it and lets revisit it next go around, if we as a group decide it is unsat.
Scoop
I don't think he is aying that DALPA said they would only affect international categories. I believe he is saying that he heard the reason the company wanted this change was because a lot of long trips in the international categories were not assingnable under the old contract.
I have heard that this was the main reason that the company wanted the ALV+15 which begs the question, why didn't we just push to allow ALV+15 in the international categories?
Like I have often posted, I don't think the ALV+15 is a big deal, but the above is a fair question: If the change was mainly to help the schedulers assign longer trips to reserves in the internaitonal categories then why not limit it to the international categories.
And like I said - I too have heard this as the reason the company wanted the change and why we obliged them.
At this point - its done, water under the bridge, make a note of it and lets revisit it next go around, if we as a group decide it is unsat.
Scoop
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post