Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2013, 12:13 PM
  #130541  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
If you have a week of vacation which system would you rather have?
Pilots who can not hold a line typically do not have the seniority to hold vacation over the summer, or holiday season.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 05-20-2013, 12:25 PM
  #130542  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,177
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Pilots who can not hold a line typically do not have the seniority to hold vacation over the summer, or holiday season.
I'm not trying to get in a tit for tat - to the contrary I was pointing out that there are pluses and minuses to our current system. Unfortunately there will always be a downside and someone will always feel they are being slighted.

I will say that the current system has had the unexpected result of more junior pilots being able to hold lines as very senior pilots are bidding RSV by choice. That is something that I would have valued greatly when I was a junior commuter always stuck on RSV - now not as much, but it does open up options on down the list. It hasn't been unusual to see REG pilots on the last page of the awards nor RSV pilots on the first page... Just offering up some food for thought. It's simply a different way of doing things. If enough of us hate it then we will make sure it goes back the other way at our next opportunity.

To be clear I'm not defending all aspects of our reserve system. There are many things that need to be fixed. I just find it disingenuous to rail on the negatives while ignoring the upside. Only by understanding the full picture will be able to make sound decisions at our next opportunity, whenever that may be.

Last edited by LeineLodge; 05-20-2013 at 12:30 PM. Reason: Correcting autocorrect
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 05-20-2013, 12:30 PM
  #130543  
veut gagner ŕ la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Saw this elsewhere
On Friday, a respected aviation blog called“Operationally Speaking” said research is underway. Boeing and a number of big European manufacturers are reportedly interested.

It would work like this: a co-pilot would be stationed on the ground. That co-pilot would essentially act like the pilot of an unmanned drone. They would be able to take “remote control” of the flight if needed.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 05-20-2013, 12:31 PM
  #130544  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
You assume pay is everything for everyone. Perhaps you misinterpreted the survey results. I think we all know what they said. More money AND More time off. Not one or the other.

Many of us don't want the extra money or the extra pay for flying to ALV +15. We're happy to make a little less money and be around for our kids' ball games in the summer.

During its sales blitz, DALPA lied about the change only affecting "international categories" and that hardly anyone would actually see it.

It's OK, though. You keep using your fuzzy math and telling us about how "we'll get them next time."
Show me one piece of info where DALPA ever said the changes only effect international. I read what they put out and attended a road slow. That was never put out and the contract was available in full language to read and does not say that.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-20-2013, 12:35 PM
  #130545  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by redship
With Part 117 allowing us to fly up to 9 hours it wouldn't surprise me. 737 pay and only 2 pilots! This sounds like a no brainer. Only time will tell...
Two things, first read your contract. 8 hours is the limit. Second read and try and understand the new rule. It's likely we will see a increase in 3 man ops because of the severe duty day restrictions on 2 man ops.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-20-2013, 12:39 PM
  #130546  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by Going2Baja
Alaska is already flying the -800 ANC to ORD...check that out. 8+ every time, blocked to 7:52 I think. And many of the ANC to Hawaii exceed 8. It's not a happy place to be for over 7.

Baja.
I flew ANC to HNL many times. If they are taking more then 8 hours they are flying it at Mach .4. It's 30 minutes longer then lax to HNL. 2400 verses 2200 miles.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-20-2013, 12:45 PM
  #130547  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,000
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Show me one piece of info where DALPA ever said the changes only effect international. I read what they put out and attended a road slow. That was never put out and the contract was available in full language to read and does not say that.

Sailing,

I don't think he is aying that DALPA said they would only affect international categories. I believe he is saying that he heard the reason the company wanted this change was because a lot of long trips in the international categories were not assingnable under the old contract.

I have heard that this was the main reason that the company wanted the ALV+15 which begs the question, why didn't we just push to allow ALV+15 in the international categories?

Like I have often posted, I don't think the ALV+15 is a big deal, but the above is a fair question: If the change was mainly to help the schedulers assign longer trips to reserves in the internaitonal categories then why not limit it to the international categories.

And like I said - I too have heard this as the reason the company wanted the change and why we obliged them.

At this point - its done, water under the bridge, make a note of it and lets revisit it next go around, if we as a group decide it is unsat.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 05-20-2013, 12:47 PM
  #130548  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
See below.....



If the ALV is 80, guarantee is 78, and youre at 77 hours with 4 days left on reserve which system would you rather have, the old or new one?
I don't know. Do you have any known absences that month? Will you actually get called for a trip? Would you have yellow highed to get above the cap as I was told on here many pilots often did to be shown full and get a big month?
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-20-2013, 12:49 PM
  #130549  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Pilots who can not hold a line typically do not have the seniority to hold vacation over the summer, or holiday season.
However they do mil leave and go to training.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-20-2013, 12:55 PM
  #130550  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Sailing,

I don't think he is aying that DALPA said they would only affect international categories. I believe he is saying that he heard the reason the company wanted this change was because a lot of long trips in the international categories were not assingnable under the old contract.

I have heard that this was the main reason that the company wanted the ALV+15 which begs the question, why didn't we just push to allow ALV+15 in the international categories?

Like I have often posted, I don't think the ALV+15 is a big deal, but the above is a fair question: If the change was mainly to help the schedulers assign longer trips to reserves in the internaitonal categories then why not limit it to the international categories.

And like I said - I too have heard this as the reason the company wanted the change and why we obliged them.

At this point - its done, water under the bridge, make a note of it and lets revisit it next go around, if we as a group decide it is unsat.

Scoop
Do you really want to go down the path of creating B scale work rules? The company did want it to cover longer trips however domestic has lots of long trips also. There are significant numbers of 4 and 5 day trips. Near the end of the month they often were impossible for the company to cover. You also have the issue of what is domestic. I once flew 12 day trips on the 727.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices