Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2013, 03:41 PM
  #129541  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Roadkill
I don't understand the "no credit" portion of this... how can you fly a trip with actual block time, and NOT get credit from the company and FAA for the trip? Am I not understanding what "credit" means here? What's the purpose of this no-credit, how does it help the company, or us? Can't understand it...
Thanks
It helps the company because the trip operates. It helps the greenslipper because he is "legal" to fly the trip regardless of current monthly block hours. IOW, it is not counted for "time" as far as you or the company is concerned it just counts for pay.

I have no idea if it is tracked for FAR limits.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 04:35 PM
  #129542  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL FO
Posts: 2,165
Default

Originally Posted by orvil
Here is what struck me.

First, is he doing anything against ALPA National's policies? No, he isn't employed by ALPA National. He is an independent contractor who was recommended by ALPA National.

Second, is he doing anything that would violate DALPA's policies? Probably not. He isn't a current MEC administrator. He isn't on the LEC. If he receives any trip drops for this business, then it would require some very serious examination. To date, there haven't been any allegations of DALPA trip drops.

Third, is his business in violation of any Delta employment policies? Maybe. This is a really grey area. My personal opinion is the Company might not be too thrilled to discover his "side" business is helping two of their competitors.

He has expertise to sell. I just hope his activities don't get him into trouble with Delta. They could.

If Delta has a problem with this consulting, DALPA and ALPA will have to let him hang out to dry. It's a independent consulting business.
Don't know who we're talking about here, but how is consulting for another pilot group "helping" a competitor? I seriously doubt if RA cares which pilot group "wins" in the UAL/CAL SLI process. What am I missing?
LeineLodge is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 05:04 PM
  #129543  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: A big one that looks like a little one
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge

Don't know who we're talking about here, but how is consulting for another pilot group "helping" a competitor? I seriously doubt if RA cares which pilot group "wins" in the UAL/CAL SLI process. What am I missing?
For as low strife as our SLI appeared to have been, and as difficult as the UAL/CAL SLI is going to be, they need all the help they can get. They deserve a fair and equitable list - I don't know why anyone would get aggravated over someone assisting to that end. You're not missing anything.

And I doubt he's getting ALPA dropped to help UAL. Has anyone checked the policy manual?
SailorJerry is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 05:04 PM
  #129544  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
Don't know who we're talking about here, but how is consulting for another pilot group "helping" a competitor? I seriously doubt if RA cares which pilot group "wins" in the UAL/CAL SLI process. What am I missing?

The butthurt some guys have because someone figured out how to make mo' money then themselves.
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 06:15 PM
  #129545  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Yes, at slow airspeeds, Dutch Roll can be even more critical because the yaw motion used to induce Dutch Roll results in one wing moving forward while the other wing is moving aft. At slow airspeeds, the wing that's moving aft will stall while the other wing is at or near L/D max. When that's happens, the roll rate becomes extremely fast until you unload the airplane.

At slow speeds (all the way up to stall), the ailerons give you all the roll rate you need for this recovery technique. Those few sim instructors at American who were advocating this technique came from the fighter world, specifically the F-4 which (I'm told) had a significant adverse yaw characteristic when ailerons were used at low speeds. This technique was wholly inappropriate for a swept wing airliner that has no adverse yaw issues, but is very vulnerable to Dutch Roll. That's why as far as I know, that technique has been completely discredited by the NTSB and the manufacturers.

Carl
Thanks, Carl. That AA briefing was pretty good it seemed, but definitely overemphasized the rudder which I understood. I didn't think it overemphasized it so much to where you shouldn't use it at high alpha which is where it is most effective at assisting roll control. Did you you at least use rudder to keep coordinated?

Last edited by 80ktsClamp; 05-02-2013 at 07:22 PM.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 07:07 PM
  #129546  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
I channeled my inner Bar to beat him to the punch. It was fun.
OK Mods, I edited it.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 09:19 PM
  #129547  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

Alaska Air connects Portland hub to Atlanta, DFW

That's nice of them to feed our largest hub. Now we can cut back some more. Or maybe we will fight for this route...by placing some of those fancy new 76 RJ's waiting for delivery on it.
Jack Bauer is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 12:25 AM
  #129548  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: A big one that looks like a little one
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
Alaska Air connects Portland hub to Atlanta, DFW

That's nice of them to feed our largest hub. Now we can cut back some more. Or maybe we will fight for this route...by placing some of those fancy new 76 RJ's waiting for delivery on it.
And when the 76 seater runs out of gas over southern Idaho on the way to PDX?

Agreed, however - ALK needs to mind their own business. Or at least politely suggest to their passengers that they give us their business.

This will be a great 737-900ER route someday.
SailorJerry is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 04:27 AM
  #129549  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

BISHKEK | Fri May 3, 2013 7:41am

(Reuters) - A U.S. military refueling plane caught fire in mid air and crashed near the border between Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan on Friday, Kyrgyzstan's Emergencies Ministry said.

The aircraft took off from the U.S. military transit center at Kyrgyzstan's Manas airport, which U.S. forces maintain for operations in Afghanistan, the Interfax news agency reported.

The plane, used for inflight refueling, disappeared from radar screens at 3.10 p.m. (0910 GMT), as it flew near the Kyrgyz village of Chaldovar, the ministry said.

"(The plane) caught fire in the air and crashed," said an official responsible for the southern Kyrgyz province of Chuisk, where Chaldovar is located.

Officials did not say how many people were on board and staff at the U.S. transit center declined to comment.

The Manas base is used to transport U.S. personnel in and out of Afghanistan and has been used by other international forces fighting in the country.

U.S. military plane crashes near Kyrgyz-Kazakh border | Reuters
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 05:15 AM
  #129550  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by Elvis90
BISHKEK | Fri May 3, 2013 7:41am

(Reuters) - A U.S. military refueling plane caught fire in mid air and crashed near the border between Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan on Friday, Kyrgyzstan's Emergencies Ministry said.

The aircraft took off from the U.S. military transit center at Kyrgyzstan's Manas airport, which U.S. forces maintain for operations in Afghanistan, the Interfax news agency reported.

The plane, used for inflight refueling, disappeared from radar screens at 3.10 p.m. (0910 GMT), as it flew near the Kyrgyz village of Chaldovar, the ministry said.

"(The plane) caught fire in the air and crashed," said an official responsible for the southern Kyrgyz province of Chuisk, where Chaldovar is located.

Officials did not say how many people were on board and staff at the U.S. transit center declined to comment.

The Manas base is used to transport U.S. personnel in and out of Afghanistan and has been used by other international forces fighting in the country.

U.S. military plane crashes near Kyrgyz-Kazakh border | Reuters
Sad day for the tanker community. Seems things have not been good flying in that area of the world recently.
PilotFrog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices