Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2013, 05:42 AM
  #127371  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
During the hey days of the Leo era in the late 90's, Delta was setting records for profitability. In fact, they started right after the concessionary POS 96 contract that brought us Express. Remember, got suckered again by the fine Mr. Terry Erskine. The pensions at the time were over funded. The C2K pay rates were sustainable at that point in time. It can be argued that Leo and Michelle's actions post 9/11 brought about the demise. Should we keep kicking the time is money can down the road?
Delta might have been setting records, but the music on those records was written during the Continental & US Air bankruptcies. When United filed in 2002 (using the same consulting group already on the Delta property) an astute watcher could correctly assume that the same model was going to be used on Delta. This began before C2K and before 9/11. The decision to strategically bankrupt Delta was probably made with the decision to bring on Leo Mullin with no experience in running an airline ... Leo Mullin was a banker / airline consultant who worked for the firm advising United on their bankruptcy.

In the spring of 2000 at a private lunch attended by Hollis Harris and other retired senior management the topic at the table was Delta's unsustainable pensions & pay (not just pilots, although that was a part of the puzzle) and the need for bankruptcy. For me this resonated with a couple of speeches I had heard from Fred Reid and Leo Mullin where they made the point that "costs do not matter. ... our competition will meet our costs and exceed them." Some friends who had helped with another airline's Section 6 bargaining were with me and none of us could believe what was being said. Some senior D-ALPA Admin were in this presentation as well, so Alpha, Slow and probably Sailing have institutional knowledge about the management roadshow during those days. I have spoken with some Delta pilots who had first hand conversations with Leo Mullin who had heard him reflect the same sort of "who cares? We will never honor those contracts anyway ...." attitude.

At the regional carriers money could not be spent fast enough. Collins was given tens of millions for equip RJ's with dual FMC / Heads Up Guidance Systems (of which more than $50,000,000 just sat on account for quite a while). The ASA and Comair divisions of Delta Air Lines Holdings reportedly paid 8 to 10 million MORE for per CRJ200 than AirTran acquired 717's for. Comair built new gates in CVG and MCO and ASA was brought out of the stone age to near Delta standard for tech and maintenance.

IMHO after 9/11 the plan got away from Leo Mullin and senior Delta management. American drastically cut costs and became a competitive monster, as did US Air. Leo, Fred and Michelle's profligate ways immediately put Delta into a much worse situation than they had anticipated. They had intended a well organized "planned burn off" (my term) and they now had an out of control forest fire on their hands.

IMHO D-ALPA did a very good job in a very tough situation, as did a lot of Delta managers. The airline had no legitimate long term plan other than to try to get through the next year, six months, week, etc. Senior management and their consultant buddies were picking the meat from Delta's bones. Leo Mullin was at best reactive according to this writer:

Airline Without A Pilot - Leadership Lessons/Inside Story of Delta's Success, Decline and Bankruptcy: Harry L. Nolan: 9780977207602: Amazon.com: Books

If I were to write a history of Delta's bankruptcy (and I've always thought one should be written), C2K would stand out as a last act of hubris which was irrelevant before it was signed (as was the United contract there). The agreement assumed economic conditions which no longer existed. It is my opinion management signed the agreement with the full expectation (at least among the senior management if not the actual signatories) that the contract would not be honored.

The scope sections of C2K began to fail within 6 months. Given that the aircraft commitments were made (and reported in the press) 18 months prior, it is pretty obvious at least one of the signatories at the table had no intention of honoring the agreement when they signed it. ... and the path to breaking that contract ... bankruptcy.

Conclusion: Management knew, and ALPA should have known, bankruptcy was coming. Why else order 500+ CRJ's to replace the 727 / 737 fleets, when your scope agreement predicates mainline growth? Why hire a banker and bankruptcy expert to run the airline? Why allow them to gild their exit packages? Why run around stating "costs don't matter" unless you never intended to pay when the bills came due?

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 03-27-2013 at 06:04 AM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 05:43 AM
  #127372  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
Johnso, not sure if you actually read the referenced Operational Excellence memo from KS.
The inefficiencies mentioned, are in the context of reducing gate latency and taxi time...

BTW, I'm not against improving our operation...

I'm just not sure how the law of unintended consequences will create some interesting results when gate-latency and D-0 are pitted against each other...

Do the airlines with the lower taxi times have the same success rate as Delta when it comes to D-0?
Should the APU-sheriff be made the Gate-sheriff to ensure a marshaling crew is ready when a jet pulls up at a gate?

Cheers
George

George,

I haven't read it yet. Thanks for filling me in. My response was to what's highlighted below.


Originally Posted by FlyZ
From the Excellence email, "as we cut inefficiencies out of the operation, Delta can funnel more flying back into the schedule to further benefit us all."

I might edit that to say as we cut inefficiencies out of the operation, Delta can continue to cut the number of pilots required and put off hiring for another two, three, or even four years.

That was probably the version that went up the chain...we saw the one that came down.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 05:55 AM
  #127373  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Airline economics is so depressing.

Time for a Wednesday morning mental health break.

Girls with hula hoops.



Check Essential is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 06:00 AM
  #127374  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
While you regale your decent deal, do you remember that you were lied to many times by the agent you pay to bargain for you? Do you look at the outsourcing and growth at code share partners, JVs and alliances and say your deal is decent?

Your deal is better than being kicked in the nutz, but it could have been much better.
Scambo:

How do you know?

I've been trying to dig into where ALPA gets it's numbers from and best I can tell (and I could be wrong because they are pretty secretive) the primary source is Delta management and whatever Delta management reports to the Feds on DOT Form 41.

(JMHO follows)

D-ALPA is characterized by its conservatism. It does not want to go out on a limb and risk being wrong, ever. It does not want to ever lose.

Many years ago I bragged about my trial record to my boss, who replied "If you win all of your trials, you are not trying enough." It was his opinion that 50/50 meant you were pushing as hard as you could push. While I don't agree completely with his position, he had a point.

If D-ALPA pushes, they are going to lose from time to time. That's fine with me; but, are our pilots who view this from 50,000 feet at Mach 3 going to understand the process and why really trying means the occasional loss?
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 06:05 AM
  #127375  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,000
Default

Also, we just covered only a small portion of the 717s on this last Advanced Displacement bid, hopefully the next few bids will actually be, ........... dare I say it, "Advanced Entitlements."


Originally Posted by johnso29
Actually, over half of the TOTAL B717 positions were funded via AE. Very few came from displacements.


Johnson,

My point was that overall the Bid was disappointing to many because the huge number of displacements cancelled out much of the potential upward movement.

I am hoping the next AE will have all/mostly AE's with little displacements. Trying to be optimistic.

Also, not sure that we have staffed, sorry, "funded," half of 88 jets with that last bid. Unless I am mistaken (happens often) At 7 crews per A/C we will need about 600 crews total

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 06:06 AM
  #127376  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Talking Now if only Delta could do that!

This forum is way too dreary and negative focused lately! I want more of everything too but complaining here is not gonna do it! So lets focus on other things that are fun to focus on! Red tomato's!!!

Air india

Cracking down on the "professionals". (Can one be a professional by answering an ad in the newspaper?) Imagine actually having to be fit to preform emergency duties!



Shape up or don't fly, Air India tells cabin crew over 40 - Travel Kit on NBCNews.com
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 06:08 AM
  #127377  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Also, we just covered only a small portion of the 717s on this last Advanced Displacement bid, hopefully the next few bids will actually be, ........... dare I say it, "Advanced Entitlements."

Johnson,

My point was that overall the Bid was disappointing to many because the huge number of displacements cancelled out much of the potential upward movement.

I am hoping the next AE will have all/mostly AE's with little displacements. Trying to be optimistic.

Also not sure that we have staffed, sorry, "funded," half of 88 jets with that last bid. Unless I am mistaken (happens often) At 7 crews per A/C we will need about 600 crews total

Scoop

Scoop,

I meant over half of the available B717 vacancies filled on the previous bid were filled via AE.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 06:20 AM
  #127378  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default Hmm Doug Parker!!

US Airways' Doug Parker on Future of Fares - CNBC


Glad we have Richard Anderson.
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 06:25 AM
  #127379  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default



forgot to bid is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 06:27 AM
  #127380  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,000
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Scoop,

I meant over half of the available B717 vacancies filled on the previous bid were filled via AE.


Gotcha. Hey, is it 7 crews per A/C or 7 Pilots, now I am not even sure.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices