Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2013, 09:01 PM
  #125471  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 7,000
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
If the airline were shrinking that would be true. The airline is finally entering a growth phase.

Sailing we have already shrunk. We did not replace any of the ER guys and others have been retiring, and none of these guys have been replaced.

In all fairness this was only the first of hopefully many bids on the 717 and so hopefully we will be entering a growth phase, but make no mistake - we have shrunk.

A lot of us were hoping this bid would finally start the movement we have been hearing about and hoping for. Yes, it was a step in the right direction, but it was a baby step at best. So even though many of have been looking forward to this bid for months, if not longer, and even though it is marginally positive - many, many individuals will be negatively impacted on this bid.

FWIW - I don't really blame the new contract for this but chalk it up to the final synergies of the merger along with pull-downs in capacity. Whatever the reason it is a bummer.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 09:33 PM
  #125472  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
I know exactly what your career has turned into daldude, and I'm one of those fairly senior guys. I pounded this keyboard like a maniac trying to warn guys in your seniority not to bite at this TA. As Bucking Bar so eloquently stated: our ability to perform flying for the Delta brand is our ONLY treasure. And we squandered it in this TA by agreeing to the changes in scope, and the ridiculous claim that we've done something about our JV's and code shares. Couple this with agreeing to further productivity increases, and the stagnation has turned into heavy displacements to lower paying aircraft.

None of our careers will get better until we fight for what is important. And that is our flying of our brand.

Carl
THIS !!!!

I couldn't have said it better. As someone who has deadheaded on Delta Connection 7 times in the past 4 months, the Delta Connection product sucks! Everyone knows it. Delta knows it. The DAL pilots know it. The passengers know it. Passengers hate waiting for their gate checked bags when its freezing in the jetway and their connection times are tight. I just don't understand why DAL likes this product? It is killing the brand.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 10:42 PM
  #125473  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 165
Default

Originally Posted by FIIGMO
FWIW, my 2006 W2 was $134/k as an LCA all on a CRJ200. I am not even close to that yet half way through year 5 at DL. Of course I am happy and would rather be here, but like a lot of people on this board it just gets old (and one gets older) being patient. I did vote for the TA because it capped RJ seats and RJ pilots flying DAL passengers. (IMHO 50 seats v. 76 seats is hard for some to accept) Short term is a drain but I am still hopeful that things will break free and when they do I am hoping that being on the front part of the 2007 wave will pay off!
No wonder you guys are so miffed. I never made more than $54K as a turboprop Captain and then haven't hit $134K here yet. I want to say you were overpaid as an RJ pilot...so confused...
hitimefurl is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 11:06 PM
  #125474  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Sailing we have already shrunk. We did not replace any of the ER guys and others have been retiring, and none of these guys have been replaced.

In all fairness this was only the first of hopefully many bids on the 717 and so hopefully we will be entering a growth phase, but make no mistake - we have shrunk.

A lot of us were hoping this bid would finally start the movement we have been hearing about and hoping for. Yes, it was a step in the right direction, but it was a baby step at best. So even though many of have been looking forward to this bid for months, if not longer, and even though it is marginally positive - many, many individuals will be negatively impacted on this bid.

FWIW - I don't really blame the new contract for this but chalk it up to the final synergies of the merger along with pull-downs in capacity. Whatever the reason it is a bummer.

Scoop
This is a example of how wrong the forum gets things. The bid that just closed in nov replaced those ER pilots in fact it replaced almost every single one. Around 94 awards were made. Add in the additional awards now and we may have added seats. The award is still available on delta net. The aug bid replaced many of the 747 captains who retired. The 330 was not back filled because of the lie flat mods.

Last edited by sailingfun; 03-10-2013 at 11:17 PM.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 11:10 PM
  #125475  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by Flamer
*Really? Let's play a game called who said this.

Flight Operations recently announced that they are prepared to begin the pilot hiring process as early as the fourth quarter of this year (2012). This is consistent with the analysis contained in this Touch & Gos.*

A. Company
B. Flight Operations
C. YOUR union

Then claim this wildly inaccurate data had no impact on TA voting? Another REALLY? Everyone should go back and read 12-06 today, then see how you feel about the information and presentation.
Begin the process is not hiring. That was to get the needed pipeline set up and start interviews. Hiring would have began in winter of13
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 11:12 PM
  #125476  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
No, they did not. It has always been stated that this bid the plan was to close the DC-9 categories.

Perhaps there were some discussions behind the scenes, but the only statements put out in crew planning memos in regard to the plan for this AE was to close the DC-9 categories.
Read the Dec crew planning letter about this bid.

e current unknown factor is the DC9. We did not expect the DC9 to remain in service into 2013, and as a result, the DC9 training department has been greatly reduced. With this reduction, we can now train only two DC9 crews a month. If a large number of DC9 pilots bid off the equipment on the October and early 2013 AE bids, we will be challenged to backfill those pilots in order to meet the summer DC9 flying demand. If DC9 pilots remain on the equipment, the situation is not as critical. Unfortunately, we are not very good at predicting pilot bidding behavior. The October 2012 bid has DC9 openings so we can create a buffer in the event a large number of DC9 pilots do bid off. The early 2013 bid may have DC9 openings as well depending on the number of DC9 pilots bidding off on the October bid.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 02:25 AM
  #125477  
Gets Weekends Off
 
capncrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,325
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
This is a example of how wrong the forum gets things. The bid that just closed in nov replaced those ER pilots in fact it replaced almost every single one. Around 94 awards were made. Add in the additional awards now and we may have added seats. The award is still available on delta net. The aug bid replaced many of the 747 captains who retired. The 330 was not back filled because of the lie flat mods.
Everybody I know has been moving backwards the last few years and the last three AEs have been the worst. You're the king of misrepresentation on this forum.
capncrunch is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 02:38 AM
  #125478  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Begin the process is not hiring. That was to get the needed pipeline set up and start interviews. Hiring would have began in winter of13
I have a hard time believing that it takes a whole year to start up the hiring/training department. Maybe a few months, but a whole year seems a bit extreme.

I'll give you that they are probably holding out for as long as they can before hiring, and then keep an even continuous stream of new hires coming to balance out retirees. Looks like they figured they could eek out another summer schedule before hiring. Not sure if that was the plan all along or not, but it certainly looks that way.
DeadHead is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 03:18 AM
  #125479  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by capncrunch
Everybody I know has been moving backwards the last few years and the last three AEs have been the worst. You're the king of misrepresentation on this forum.
He stated they have not replaced any of the 767 captains that retired. You can read the last bid yourself. I guess your stating that crew planning is posting fake results. They also had additional 767 awards on the Aug bid. I did not even count those because the results are no longer in Icrew. The truth is a far cry from no 767 captains being filled. In fact they appear to have added 767 captains beyond those that retired. In NY last summer we had 280 to 290 captains. Going to have 300 plus this summer. Very strange with the same block hours and the massive job loss from the contract.
The last two bids were net positive. This bid is net positive.
I guess you would have preferred that Delta furloughed the surplus FO,s. that would have made for lots of upward movement as they were brought back. Personally I think it was better to keep them on the property. In the Captains seats which were not overstaffed to the extent of the FO' we have now added over 215 new positions since the contract was signed. Crew planning has stated that with this bid they will have used up the surplus FO's and expect the bids going forward to be almost all AE's. I call this good news, you can call it whatever you want.

Last edited by sailingfun; 03-11-2013 at 03:28 AM.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 03:22 AM
  #125480  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,614
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
I have a hard time believing that it takes a whole year to start up the hiring/training department. Maybe a few months, but a whole year seems a bit extreme.

I'll give you that they are probably holding out for as long as they can before hiring, and then keep an even continuous stream of new hires coming to balance out retirees. Looks like they figured they could eek out another summer schedule before hiring. Not sure if that was the plan all along or not, but it certainly looks that way.
I have no idea where you come uo with a year. They planned to set things up in Nov of 12 to start interviews in Dec with pilots in class in Feb of 13.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices