Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2013, 01:47 PM
  #125401  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by SailorJerry
Not even Crew Resources is expecting everyone to go to 65. The data is pretty clear on a mid 62 average retirement age.
Everyone won't make it to 65. They know that because not everyone made it to 60. Yet somehow we can count on ONLY 578 retirements in the next 5 years, but none of the 4200+ the following 5 years? How convienent.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 01:49 PM
  #125402  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by SailorJerry
Not even Crew Resources is expecting everyone to go to 65. The data is pretty clear on a mid 62 average retirement age.
What Data and can you send it to me?

I do not know where they are getting their numbers and I have asked both crew resources and the union. But, they are not getting them from historical or empirical numbers since 2007, anything prior to that is irrelevant. If they are including the early out guys they need to be removed from the formula as well since they were given incentives to retire.

See my previous post on how I arrived at 64 years and 4 months.
daldude is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 01:51 PM
  #125403  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: A big one that looks like a little one
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29

Everyone won't make it to 65. They know that because not everyone made it to 60. Yet somehow we can count on ONLY 578 retirements in the next 5 years, but none of the 4200+ the following 5 years? How convienent.
The DJI and the retirement age will move inverse to one another. I'm not surprised many were stretching for 65, or took an early out close to it over the last few years. But anyone who may have been 55 and reasonably invested to retire in early 2009 is gonna be ready to go here real soon.
SailorJerry is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 01:52 PM
  #125404  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by APCLurker
Precisely some of the points I was making, and examples of what could happen in the future, especially based on current/recent/past events. Emphasis on -could- for the reading impaired.
Another weak argument on your part. We -could- also recapture RJ flying on the next contract. We -could- order WBs resulting in immediate growth resulting in the need to hire. We -could- see over half of our scheduled retirements go by 62 years of age.

It goes both ways. Apparently you're reading impaired as well.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 01:57 PM
  #125405  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: A big one that looks like a little one
Posts: 633
Default

Originally Posted by daldude

What Data and can you send it to me?

I do not know where they are getting their numbers and I have asked both crew resources and the union. But, they are not getting them from historical or empirical numbers since 2007, anything prior to that is irrelevant. If they are including the early out guys they need to be removed from the formula as well since they were given incentives to retire.

See my previous post on how I arrived at 64 years and 4 months.
The DAL Openboard. Publishes the age of all people that drop off the seniority list. I lopped off everyone that was under 55 and arrived at 62 and 7 months.

If the company can buy people out at 62.5 and make it make financial sense, then they'll continue to do so. They wouldn't be doing it if they didn't think it'd make sense.

I'm pretty sure someone in Crew Resources is smart enough to make a histogram.
SailorJerry is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 01:59 PM
  #125406  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 488
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
So while you didn't use the word "solid" you most certainly did state that any numbers beyond 5 years were "entirely irrelevant." Yet somehow the 578 retirements from now until 2017 are all we are going to get? Do you have solid proof that no one will retire early?

No. I absolutely never said the bolded part whatsoever, and again: "prove it" as you so liked to tell others.

Where did I ever say that 578 are all the retirements we are going to get during that time period? That is the number that turn 65 during that period. I never said that is all we would get. Once again, as apparently it needs to be repeated, it was referencing people's belief that we have alot more than that retiring very soon due to turning 65. I'm not talking about what -might acutally- happen in addition. That is the number turning 65 in that period. I said that there are 578 turning age 65 durinig that period. And I'm not even the one that originally said it!

Again, I never said that 578 retirements is all we are going to get. Prove that I did.

And I noticed you conveniently avoided my challenge on the age 65 accusation. Still waiting for your proof on that one as well. I never said it (a change) was happening.

I also find it interesting that the opinions I expressed are basically the same as daldudes, yet his posts are ok....

Last edited by APCLurker; 03-10-2013 at 02:14 PM.
APCLurker is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 01:59 PM
  #125407  
Gets Weekends Off
 
finis72's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 777 Sim Instructor
Posts: 745
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Just wondering if there are any 'yes' voters here who have realized they made a mistake.
Two and a half months into this contract ? No, ask me summer of 2014. By then I will have enough info to know.
finis72 is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 02:02 PM
  #125408  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by daldude
Fair Post but it is always good to keep perspective.

First lets talk age 65 retirement. The union and company keep pitching 62 1/2 as avg retirement age. Well I do not feel this is reality. Since they raised the age to 65, raped the pension and cut pay I would argue that most stay until 64 years and 4 months. Here is how I arrived at my number, definitely 2 hours I will never get back. Basically, I took total number of retired pilots since 2007, subtracted all retirements affiliated with early retirement programs then averaged age of remaining pilots (Why not include early out pilots? Because these pilots were induced to retire, so they artificially reduce natural retirement age). So TA DA avg. Age 64 and 4 months. I have asked the union for verification but they have yet to provide any numbers.

Now for some perspective on the mass retirements between now 2017 and 2023. Even with 4,258 retirements plus the 578 in next 5 years. A 2001 hire will not quite be into the top 50% of the seniority list after 23 years I will be 51 numbers short of cracking top half of list on 31 December 2023 and many NW and summer 2001 Delta hires will actually be further than me.

But here is the worst part. All of this assumes that they replace the pilots that retire. But we know that they have chosen to shrink the airline and have not replaced the last 800 ish retirements and they just announced in the most recent bid package (5th paragraph line 1) that they do not plan to hire to fill pilot vacancy's. We also have Sailing who is very smart and informative, already dropping hints that they plan to continue the the 757 retirements. Just like he dropped hints that they would accelerate the retirement of the DC9's. Kinda letting us down gently with accurate tidbits of information.

With all of that said, Johnson I don't know how old you were when you got hired in 2008 but I was at 34, fairly average I think. My career is nearly half over and when I crack the top half of the seniority list I will have 8 years 1 month until I am forced to retire. So that is why my generation of pilot is distraught. Even if the so called rocket ship of retirements takes off it makes no difference our careers will be over. They have essentially been over since the merger and age 65 took place.

Yes it is a good job, that is why we all don't quit. But all of this hiring this and hiring that is not supported by reality or what is actually happening.

daldude,

I'm not trying to downplay the sour turn your career took. Please understand that. I won't pretend to know how you feel. I simply can't. I was 28 when I was hired. Two guys in my class were junior to me, the youngest @ 25 years of age. The last decade of this career is likely the worst ever experienced. It shattered the dreams and expectations of many, & it sucks. But it's over, & it's not coming back. We are witnessing a crazy transformation of the way the industry will do business, & Delta is leading the pack. I feel it will pay off for the pilots, and that will happen soon.

As I said before, I hope your left seat comes sooner then you expect. And thanks for the cordial discussion.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 02:04 PM
  #125409  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 488
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Another weak argument on your part. We -could- also recapture RJ flying on the next contract. We -could- order WBs resulting in immediate growth resulting in the need to hire. We -could- see over half of our scheduled retirements go by 62 years of age.

Exactly. What part of my opinion vs your opinion is escaping you?


You and others seem to think that retirements in the future are going to be the cause of the rocketship. I am saying I don't think so for various reasons. I have not tried to present anything as "fact."
APCLurker is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 02:04 PM
  #125410  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 167
Default

2023 is a DECADE away
MD88Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices