Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2013, 08:38 AM
  #125351  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,049
Default

Originally Posted by ilinipilot
RE Seniority on ATL 717 A

How much do you think the schedules will play into people bidding the 717? If you look at our DC9 schedules they are not good. Lots of 5 legs days short overnights and your variety is weak.
Will that affect some people and their desire to move up?

Also on a related note has it been addressed if the 717 will have 5 day trips? The DC9 has a few but does that mean the 717 will too?
Well, I have done those trips. 3-5 legs a day for 3-5 days straight. A grind when the weather is good, ugh when the wx is bad. I remember thinking "awesome, a 13 hour layover so I can eat, workout and sleep 8 hours". Now, the 717 will take a bit of the sting out of it with the FMS, GPS, but the trips will be a bit worse than before on the DC-9 a few years back, IMO.

It took a while to figure out why there were so many senior FO's vs. junior Captains out of seniority, but take the in QOL and the way you "can" pick up trips if you want, the 10-20K per year gets much smaller with the options.
boog123 is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 08:38 AM
  #125352  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by daldude
Sailing,

So while I don't refute that Delta added Capt positions. The way this bid is falling out the Jr. FO's like me, Roadkill and many others see mass displacements to smaller aircraft as well as crew resources stating "we do not plan to hire to replace vacancies" I know you keep saying we are going to hire. But that is not what crew resources is publishing they are saying "we do not plan to hire to replace vacancies". I did go to the road show a couple of weeks ago and they pumped everybody up by saying we are going to hire, then they decide to shut down the DC9's a year early so they can continue to delay hiring. If SD and company had just said that we are going to displace 700 pilots and shut down the DC9's early so we can fund the 717 and build up 737's, I feel other than the short term riot in the pilot lounge I could have at least respected them for telling the truth.

Keep posting though, we all need the pep talks to counter the reality of being displaced off of narrow body aircraft after 13 years.
The DC9s are not being parked a year early. They originally were supposed to be parked in 2012, then 2013, & now 2014. And that's when they're scheduled to be parked, 2014.

But your overall career stagnation does stink.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 08:48 AM
  #125353  
Sho me da money!
 
FIIGMO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: B25, Left
Posts: 947
Default

Bar, Good posts!


Still feel depressed about this MD bid! Looking at my W2 from last year wondering how things will shape up next year and will inflation compound the down grade losses!

Fiig

Last edited by FIIGMO; 03-10-2013 at 08:58 AM.
FIIGMO is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 08:53 AM
  #125354  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TeddyKGB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: 7er
Posts: 1,673
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Singapore had complained more about having 50% of Virgin's losses more than the acquisition cost.

Anyone know if the losses at Pinnacle, GOL and Virgin harm our profit sharing, or just our seat progression ?
I don't believe that 9E will be costing Delta much money going forward. It will be dirt cheap feed for Delta for many years to come and they don't have to pay the middle man since we own them.
TeddyKGB is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 08:59 AM
  #125355  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 272
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
The DC9s are not being parked a year early. They originally were supposed to be parked in 2012, then 2013, & now 2014. And that's when they're scheduled to be parked, 2014.

But your overall career stagnation does stink.

I do not have enough information about the inner working of crew resources to argue or refute. But at the crew resources lounge visit a couple of week ago they did not lead us to believe they were going to shut down the DC9 category this bid, there was concern about people bidding of of it though. However, I could have missed the shut down DC9 to avoid hiring slide though. Even a week ago Sailing was warning on this forum that the DC9's were going to be shut down early so they could avoid hiring. Because if they were going to keep the 9's open and man the 717 the company would have to hire pilots for sufficient manning. He also stated the ops would like to hire pilots but Delta would prefer to avoid hiring. And once again, crew resources in the second paragraph of the bid says "we do not plan to hire pilots to fill vacancies". So if you do not fill vacancies you are shrinking, no growth, no progression. Obviously what we don't know is how far delta plans to shrink. But what we do know is that at this point on this bid they are planning to shrink and do not plan to hire.
daldude is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 09:15 AM
  #125356  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

I took the plunge and bid ATL 717B. Maybe I'll finally be able to hold a line...then I'll select DTW 717B in the next bid, and perhaps they 'll eventually establish a MSP 717 base. I'll minimize my training footprint and get some time off for my move from TX to MN.
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 09:26 AM
  #125357  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,412
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
The DC9s are not being parked a year early. They originally were supposed to be parked in 2012, then 2013, & now 2014. And that's when they're scheduled to be parked, 2014.

But your overall career stagnation does stink.
They were going to keep the nines through the summer of 14. That changed in the last 45 days. They will now be gone around the first of the year. I think once flight ops had a firm look at the block hour program they were able to make a solid case that they could not staff the airline unless they hired. The final choice was sadly to park the nines earlier then the last plan and avoid hiring. This is not good news but does again support that the TA did not cost us a significant number of jobs. If it had they would have easily been able to staff the nines without hiring and keep the nines.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 09:31 AM
  #125358  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by LivingTheDream
Just for fun, looked at 717A ATL. I'm 25xx and there is one above me with 717A as first choice... was a bit surprised at that... I get that being no. 1 is kewl... just not 25yrs kewl at that pay rate (even with GS's)!
Guessing this individual is like some others we have.

Has a business or other lucrative income stream on the side. Bids very senior into a category. The pilot then bids prime trips that are easy to get off their schedule and easy to pick up and integrate by others onto their lines of times.

Most Western guys fit this description and many made much more from their side interests than they did from flying. Flying became like a hobby for them where they would come fly a good trip with a nice Mexican resort layover and stay current.
TheManager is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 09:34 AM
  #125359  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

............

Last edited by johnso29; 03-10-2013 at 09:38 AM. Reason: Nevermind
johnso29 is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 09:39 AM
  #125360  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
They were going to keep the nines through the summer of 14. That changed in the last 45 days. They will now be gone around the first of the year. I think once flight ops had a firm look at the block hour program they were able to make a solid case that they could not staff the airline unless they hired. The final choice was sadly to park the nines earlier then the last plan and avoid hiring. This is not good news but does again support that the TA did not cost us a significant number of jobs. If it had they would have easily been able to staff the nines without hiring and keep the nines.

Was the trade off to keep some 757s flying?
johnso29 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices