Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,049
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
RE Seniority on ATL 717 A
How much do you think the schedules will play into people bidding the 717? If you look at our DC9 schedules they are not good. Lots of 5 legs days short overnights and your variety is weak.
Will that affect some people and their desire to move up?
Also on a related note has it been addressed if the 717 will have 5 day trips? The DC9 has a few but does that mean the 717 will too?
How much do you think the schedules will play into people bidding the 717? If you look at our DC9 schedules they are not good. Lots of 5 legs days short overnights and your variety is weak.
Will that affect some people and their desire to move up?
Also on a related note has it been addressed if the 717 will have 5 day trips? The DC9 has a few but does that mean the 717 will too?
It took a while to figure out why there were so many senior FO's vs. junior Captains out of seniority, but take the in QOL and the way you "can" pick up trips if you want, the 10-20K per year gets much smaller with the options.
![boog123 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sailing,
So while I don't refute that Delta added Capt positions. The way this bid is falling out the Jr. FO's like me, Roadkill and many others see mass displacements to smaller aircraft as well as crew resources stating "we do not plan to hire to replace vacancies" I know you keep saying we are going to hire. But that is not what crew resources is publishing they are saying "we do not plan to hire to replace vacancies". I did go to the road show a couple of weeks ago and they pumped everybody up by saying we are going to hire, then they decide to shut down the DC9's a year early so they can continue to delay hiring. If SD and company had just said that we are going to displace 700 pilots and shut down the DC9's early so we can fund the 717 and build up 737's, I feel other than the short term riot in the pilot lounge I could have at least respected them for telling the truth.
Keep posting though, we all need the pep talks to counter the reality of being displaced off of narrow body aircraft after 13 years.
So while I don't refute that Delta added Capt positions. The way this bid is falling out the Jr. FO's like me, Roadkill and many others see mass displacements to smaller aircraft as well as crew resources stating "we do not plan to hire to replace vacancies" I know you keep saying we are going to hire. But that is not what crew resources is publishing they are saying "we do not plan to hire to replace vacancies". I did go to the road show a couple of weeks ago and they pumped everybody up by saying we are going to hire, then they decide to shut down the DC9's a year early so they can continue to delay hiring. If SD and company had just said that we are going to displace 700 pilots and shut down the DC9's early so we can fund the 717 and build up 737's, I feel other than the short term riot in the pilot lounge I could have at least respected them for telling the truth.
Keep posting though, we all need the pep talks to counter the reality of being displaced off of narrow body aircraft after 13 years.
But your overall career stagnation does stink.
![Frown](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/frown.gif)
![johnso29 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Bar, Good posts!
Still feel depressed about this MD bid! Looking at my W2 from last year wondering how things will shape up next year and will inflation compound the down grade losses!
Fiig
Still feel depressed about this MD bid! Looking at my W2 from last year wondering how things will shape up next year and will inflation compound the down grade losses!
Fiig
Last edited by FIIGMO; 03-10-2013 at 08:58 AM.
![FIIGMO is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't believe that 9E will be costing Delta much money going forward. It will be dirt cheap feed for Delta for many years to come and they don't have to pay the middle man since we own them.
![TeddyKGB is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 272
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I do not have enough information about the inner working of crew resources to argue or refute. But at the crew resources lounge visit a couple of week ago they did not lead us to believe they were going to shut down the DC9 category this bid, there was concern about people bidding of of it though. However, I could have missed the shut down DC9 to avoid hiring slide though. Even a week ago Sailing was warning on this forum that the DC9's were going to be shut down early so they could avoid hiring. Because if they were going to keep the 9's open and man the 717 the company would have to hire pilots for sufficient manning. He also stated the ops would like to hire pilots but Delta would prefer to avoid hiring. And once again, crew resources in the second paragraph of the bid says "we do not plan to hire pilots to fill vacancies". So if you do not fill vacancies you are shrinking, no growth, no progression. Obviously what we don't know is how far delta plans to shrink. But what we do know is that at this point on this bid they are planning to shrink and do not plan to hire.
![daldude is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I took the plunge and bid ATL 717B. Maybe I'll finally be able to hold a line...then I'll select DTW 717B in the next bid, and perhaps they 'll eventually establish a MSP 717 base. I'll minimize my training footprint and get some time off for my move from TX to MN.
![Elvis90 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,412
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
They were going to keep the nines through the summer of 14. That changed in the last 45 days. They will now be gone around the first of the year. I think once flight ops had a firm look at the block hour program they were able to make a solid case that they could not staff the airline unless they hired. The final choice was sadly to park the nines earlier then the last plan and avoid hiring. This is not good news but does again support that the TA did not cost us a significant number of jobs. If it had they would have easily been able to staff the nines without hiring and keep the nines.
![sailingfun is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Has a business or other lucrative income stream on the side. Bids very senior into a category. The pilot then bids prime trips that are easy to get off their schedule and easy to pick up and integrate by others onto their lines of times.
Most Western guys fit this description and many made much more from their side interests than they did from flying. Flying became like a hobby for them where they would come fly a good trip with a nice Mexican resort layover and stay current.
![TheManager is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
............
Last edited by johnso29; 03-10-2013 at 09:38 AM. Reason: Nevermind
![johnso29 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
They were going to keep the nines through the summer of 14. That changed in the last 45 days. They will now be gone around the first of the year. I think once flight ops had a firm look at the block hour program they were able to make a solid case that they could not staff the airline unless they hired. The final choice was sadly to park the nines earlier then the last plan and avoid hiring. This is not good news but does again support that the TA did not cost us a significant number of jobs. If it had they would have easily been able to staff the nines without hiring and keep the nines.
Was the trade off to keep some 757s flying?
![johnso29 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post