Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2013, 03:44 PM
  #124851  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
Default

Originally Posted by Moby Dick
you're cream skimmers at best.

If you want to be a Captain so bad, you could always bid JFK.
Don't make it too impossible for us. Let me tell you what happens next.

Our own Alpha does some spreadsheet jujitsu and next think you know you got all these long hair, mustached, guys with Minnesotan accents bidding your base. Then you'll be back on some Douglas product that inspired Denzel Washington to become an alcoholic. So when you look at a People's Magazine 2012 "Sexiest Man Alive" seated to your left in a Douglas jet, you'd better call him Captain Cream Skinner, then run.


Did I manage to annoy everyone in one post?
  • ALPA - check
  • Delta pilots, too smart by half, that worked on the integration - Check
  • Northwest Pilots - check
  • Alaska pilots - check
  • Drunks - check
  • Douglas Pilots - Check
  • Garrison Keilor's neghbors - check
  • OBAP - check
  • Captains = Check
  • First Officers - Check
Mission Accomplished!
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 03:48 PM
  #124852  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 581
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Also, I think there is a clause to say your safety and ability to do your job requires you to use a corporate jet over airlines when there are airline options available to you. I think Tiger would qualify.
I apologize for the late reply. I've been gone all day, but I just could not let that paragraph go by without a comment.

YGTBFSM,

The airline industry has demonstrated by a preponderance of statistical evidence over many, many years that it is the safest way to travel. Nothing else even comes close.

I think I saw a statistic that you're more likely to die from choking on your Thanksgiving turkey than on the airline flight to Grandma's house.

So... I live at 7,200 feet in elevation. I get a sh*tload of snow at my house. My job requires that I get to the airport on time, every time, regardless of the weather.

Suppose I buy a Mercedes Unimog and try and write that expense off, because "I have to have that to get to my job". How far will that fly with the IRS?

I'm guessing that expense would be denied...
Wasatch Phantom is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 03:48 PM
  #124853  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 36N15
Posts: 323
Default

Nah, I'll bid JFK and be super senior.
Moby Dick is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 03:49 PM
  #124854  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 36N15
Posts: 323
Default

Are you kidding? A Unimog is WAY to slow for any Type A airline pilot to even consider buying for a commuter car. The IRS would be on you like a duck on a June bug.
Moby Dick is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 03:52 PM
  #124855  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Wasatch Phantom
I apologize for the late reply. I've been gone all day, but I just could not let that paragraph go by without a comment.

YGTBFSM,

The airline industry has demonstrated by a preponderance of statistical evidence over many, many years that it is the safest way to travel. Nothing else even comes close.

I think I saw a statistic that you're more likely to die from choking on your Thanksgiving turkey than on the airline flight to Grandma's house.

So... I live at 7,200 feet in elevation. I get a sh*tload of snow at my house. My job requires that I get to the airport on time, every time, regardless of the weather.

Suppose I buy a Mercedes Unimog and try and write that expense off, because "I have to have that to get to my job". How far will that fly with the IRS?

I'm guessing that expense would be denied...
Actually, as a section 179 expense, a Unimog would fit the requirements. You just have to be eligible to take that expense - like I am. You can write it off the top the year it is put into operation - no depreciation required. This is not tax advice dyodd.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 03:58 PM
  #124856  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,410
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Does this includes Capt. Dickson's latest podcast info? I forgot when he stated the DC9 would be gone, but Network wanted it later and Flight Operations wanted it sooner for just the reasons you mentioned. Both sides made their case and Flight Ops won the earlier retirement date. Capt. Dickson said this would be good for pilots, as would reduce the need for displacements to the 717 since the new flying could be "funded" with DC9 crews.

Note (change in terms): We were pilots, then we were staff, now we are funds.
I did not catch his podcast. I know there has been a big struggle. Flight ops wanted the nines gone to time the training with the 717. Last spring they were told by marketing they had to keep them longer. Flight ops came back with that would require hiring pilots because of the training. The bean counters refused to fund the hiring. Perhaps in the end there was a compromise and the nines retirement was moved back up. It would make sense.
sailingfun is online now  
Old 03-06-2013, 04:00 PM
  #124857  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 581
Default

Originally Posted by Erdude32
Can we get off taxes and get back to predicting the Alaska codeshare meltdown? Ok I'll admit I have skin in the game and a vested interest in seeing more west coast block hours back at DAL. Since my displacement (which I attribute directly to flying transferred to our DCI carrier Alaska)... I've lost at least 180extra days away from my family and over $12,000 in commuting/crash pad expense. The faster this unravels the better and yes I'm bitter and un-apologetic about it. Rant over.
Sorry ERdude...

Okay so Tiger Woods gets to write off his G-V...

I'll use FTB ('cuz I'd like to meet the legendary FTB and buy him a beer, or three).

Suppose the best he can hold in ATL (closest pilot domicile to his residence) is MD-88B. Now let's suppose Mrs. FTB decides she wants to redecorate the house, and to pay for all this FTB bids NYC-ERB for the extra money.

In doing so he must commute. He must spend money on hotels and meals, etc. to increase his earnings. Why can't he write off those expenses? At least to the extent of the extra income?

That is, suppose for the sake of argument by bidding the ER in NYC FTB earns an extra $15K in income, and he spends $5K in expenses. Why can't he write that off?

Tiger has to (couldn't possibly lower himself to fly an airline) go to The Master's in his G-V. Presumably because it reduces his stress so he will do better in the tournament and earn more money.

I submit FTB should be able to write off his commuting expenses!

(FTB, No offense meant.)
Wasatch Phantom is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 04:02 PM
  #124858  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Wasn't Western then what Alaska is now?

It already happened in my career lifetime, once. I'd be cautious before using absolute terms.

It may be as unlikely as ALPA recovering flying ... hey wait ... oh yah, I mean ... YAY!

717 isn't forecast for the left coast, but it would work quite well there.

Passengers prefer 2 x 3 seating too.

P.S. Anyone know if we are moving the MD95 / 717 seats t go with the DL standard?

P.S. #2: It has been noted that Delta pilots exclaim some pleasure in the idea of getting to fly Delta passengers and Alaska's pilots get whiny. Ahem ... what's wrong with us flying our own passengers?

If you're really PO'd just get Lee Moak to let you do an Alaska scope deal with Delta management. Apparently national sees no problem with making the Delta negotiating table a family style meal, and you don't even have to be family.
The MD-90s are normal instead of backwards like the honey badgers, so it would be logical that the 717s are the same. They apparently DO care.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 04:07 PM
  #124859  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cubdrick's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: #41
Posts: 283
Default

Originally Posted by Wasatch Phantom

The airline industry has demonstrated by a preponderance of statistical evidence over many, many years that it is the safest way to travel. Nothing else even comes close.

I think I saw a statistic that you're more likely to die from choking on your Thanksgiving turkey than on the airline flight to Grandma's house.
They're not referring to safe modes of transportation, rather "personal safety" as in limited access by the general public. Keeping high profile CEOs and politicians safe and out of public reach is probably beneficial to all of us. Although I personally wouldn't mind if Pelosi and Nancy Grace were forced to ride in the middle of a hooligan packed 777.

Last edited by Cubdrick; 03-06-2013 at 04:45 PM.
Cubdrick is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 04:17 PM
  #124860  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 269
Default

Originally Posted by Moby Dick
Nah, I'll bid JFK and be super senior.

Now isn't that smack talk?

I would not even try to imply how a SLI would go. Anyone you might have to do a SLI with has a much broader reach and larger jets.
Rogue24 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices