Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2013, 01:29 PM
  #124841  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Originally Posted by Jughead
Nothing to do with the subject at hand, but my gripe d'jour - Flightline - I ordered that expense report on Dec 15, Turbotax was finished 3 weeks ago, and it's all that's holding me up.

I was on hold for 25 minutes to have somebody tell me it should be soon.

Anybody else having this problem?

Nevermore!

Yo Jughead! I e-mailed the company and cancelled my order. Less than satisfied.
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 02:01 PM
  #124842  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,412
Default

Originally Posted by Roadkill
Ok, let's have some speculation on DTW73N B.
Crew resources posted they will open the category with 20 "crews", so that means 20A and 20B.

LAX and SLC already go through DTW and layover there all the time, 50% of our trips could be built with DTW as the start/stop. So I'm going to assume that most of the flying will look the same as what 73n is already seeing. Crew resources doesn't say DTW will be a 900 base, just that it will be a 73n base in preparation for receiving the 900s. They don't say where those 900s will be, still.

Does anyone have some thoughts on how senior DTW73n B will go? Let's keep the focus on 2000 and later hires, since that is where the whip-saw will be for possible displacements.

After they build the base up, how will seniority at DTW compare to ATL for 73? I suspect it will reflect the same levels as other DTW vs. ATL current categories, so ER and 320 for 2000 and later hires ("new hires" lol). That means DTW would be a good bit more junior.

I have to stick DTW73n into my lineup for displacement bids, trying to decide how it might be vs. ATL for commuting, trips, seniority... And dat AE is taking sooooo long to arrive! Let's hear some thoughts!

I am not totally sure what your driving at when you discuss 900 bases. There won't be any 900 bases. It will just be the 73N category. Pilots from any base could fly the aircraft and almost certainly it will vary month to month regardless of what city pairs marketing chooses to operate the aircraft on.
As far as DTW I would suspect it will see a continued addition of 737 time as more 900's are delivered. The company loves to open a base when adding block hours to a category. It greatly reduces their training required. As each 900 is delivered the 73N pool of block hours will increase. I would expect crew planning to want a absolute minimum base size of about 60 crews for efficiency. Crew planning will decide which base to allocate those block hours into however I would be very secure saying DTW will get to at least the 60 crew number.. There have been occasions where the company has restricted a variant aircraft to a specific base because of differences. I don't think that will be the case with the 900 but it could be a option initially until they get enough aircraft in the system to insure currency.
Keep in mind the following. This is a one year bid. That does not however mean that it will be inclusive of all increases or reductions in flying the next year. There will almost certainly be 2 to 3 more bids before next March. 20 crews are only 3 airframes. I think we take delivery of about 15 airframes before March of next year. Crew planning could choose to staff all those airframes in this bid but more then likely they will fund enough flying to keep the sims full and wait to see future marketing decisions before staffing for all the new 900's arriving by March of 14. It will be interesting to see the total increase in 73N positions system wide. Will the only increase be the DTW opening or will they staff additional block hours at existing bases or wait and post that flying in other bids this year?
Another issue in this bid is the DC-9. The pilots displaced off the nine can't really be used to fund the 717 flying since they start flying in Sep and the nines will be around at least through Feb of next year unless something changes. That is one of the reasons that flight ops wanted to hire 100 to 150 pilots this winter. They were not approved for funding the additional bodies. Adding those pilots would have really smoothed out the training flow. Now they face pilots displacing into the 717 and then bidding right out as we finally start to see significant upward movement with the block hour shift to the mainline. Carry the FO surplus a bit longer in existing aircraft while putting new hires into the 717 would really have simplified the training pipeline.
I think its a long shot at the moment but I understand that depending on the number of training events generate by this bid they might still consider a small summer hiring option to as I mentioned reduce training if they can sell it on a cost basis.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 02:18 PM
  #124843  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by Jughead
Nothing to do with the subject at hand, but my gripe d'jour - Flightline - I ordered that expense report on Dec 15, Turbotax was finished 3 weeks ago, and it's all that's holding me up.

I was on hold for 25 minutes to have somebody tell me it should be soon.

Anybody else having this problem?

Nevermore!

Spoke to them this morning. They told me they had to re-run some of the reports. I told them if I don't have it by Friday I'm canceling my order and going to another vendor.

Ordered mine over 5 weeks ago. I'm also done with them as well.
Over heard plenty of other venders with turnaround times of less than a few days.

Someone recommended Expert Per Diem Calculation Service Pilots Flight Attendants that seems to be my plan B. Anyone else use them before?


Originally Posted by Elvis90
Yo Jughead! I e-mailed the company and cancelled my order. Less than satisfied.
Who you decide to go with Elvis?
DeadHead is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 02:26 PM
  #124844  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
Spoke to them this morning. They told me they had to re-run some of the reports. I told them if I don't have it by Friday I'm canceling my order and going to another vendor.

Ordered mine over 5 weeks ago. I'm also done with them as well.
Over heard plenty of other venders with turnaround times of less than a few days.

Someone recommended Expert Per Diem Calculation Service Pilots Flight Attendants that seems to be my plan B. Anyone else use them before?




Who you decide to go with Elvis?
Pro Diem could get you the report within a day. I had mine by Jan 5th. Awesome company and the service is outstanding. If you order and pay prior to December, they run the report through the end of October for you so when Jan 1st hits it only takes them a day to finish the report. I actually had mine within an hour of finishing the data download on the 5th of Jan. They also give you a discount if you do the preseason deal and will send you email reminders in the fall so you don't forget to do it.
RockyBoy is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 02:32 PM
  #124845  
On Reserve
 
Elvis90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Default

Deadhead, I guessed. Sounds like others are finding success with Prodiem.
Elvis90 is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 03:02 PM
  #124846  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 36N15
Posts: 323
Default

Originally Posted by Erdude32
Can we get off taxes and get back to predicting the Alaska codeshare meltdown? yes I'm bitter and un-apologetic about it. Rant over.

Get over it. It ain't happening in your career lifetime. Delta can't duplicate the AS system and the only way you're getting the green off your route map is if DAL buys AS.

Time to worry about something you might have some control over.
Moby Dick is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 03:18 PM
  #124847  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Another issue in this bid is the DC-9. The pilots displaced off the nine can't really be used to fund the 717 flying since they start flying in Sep and the nines will be around at least through Feb of next year unless something changes.
Does this includes Capt. Dickson's latest podcast info? I forgot when he stated the DC9 would be gone, but Network wanted it later and Flight Operations wanted it sooner for just the reasons you mentioned. Both sides made their case and Flight Ops won the earlier retirement date. Capt. Dickson said this would be good for pilots, as would reduce the need for displacements to the 717 since the new flying could be "funded" with DC9 crews.

Note (change in terms): We were pilots, then we were staff, now we are funds.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 03:22 PM
  #124848  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
Default

Originally Posted by Moby Dick
Get over it. It ain't happening in your career lifetime. Delta can't duplicate the AS system ...
Wasn't Western then what Alaska is now?

It already happened in my career lifetime, once. I'd be cautious before using absolute terms.

It may be as unlikely as ALPA recovering flying ... hey wait ... oh yah, I mean ... YAY!

717 isn't forecast for the left coast, but it would work quite well there.

Passengers prefer 2 x 3 seating too.

P.S. Anyone know if we are moving the MD95 / 717 seats t go with the DL standard?

P.S. #2: It has been noted that Delta pilots exclaim some pleasure in the idea of getting to fly Delta passengers and Alaska's pilots get whiny. Ahem ... what's wrong with us flying our own passengers?

If you're really PO'd just get Lee Moak to let you do an Alaska scope deal with Delta management. Apparently national sees no problem with making the Delta negotiating table a family style meal, and you don't even have to be family.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 03-06-2013 at 03:35 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 03:32 PM
  #124849  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 36N15
Posts: 323
Default

Originally Posted by ITSALLGOOD
We will soon have three mega-carriers with strong and expansive route structures. It only makes sense to me they will not let AS dominate the west coast. AS will be a victim of collateral damage. Or I am way off...just as likely.
You forget we already codeshare with two of the "big" three. So, unless UCAL decides to make a run at us, neither of the other two are willing to pay what it takes to buy us.

Why should they, after all? They're getting it for free now.

Originally Posted by ITSALLGOOD
Agreed. I guess my point is this LA/SEA build up on core AS routes is no warning shot. It's the real deal...a long term strategic move.
Step away from the crack pipe. Unless DAL is willing to drop 500 flights a day up and down the West Coast, you're cream skimmers at best. And the AS FF program will show you the error of your ways.

You should read your own propaganda. The new flying out of LAX is aimed at UCAL and USAAir, not AS. And, that's from YOUR own puzzle palace.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Wasn't Western then what Alaska is now?
It certainly was. And DAL stripped the West Coast and put the assets into their East/West network. AA did the same thing with Air Cal and Reno Air. USAir did it to PSA. That's how we got where we are today.

Unfortunately for the biggies, its too expensive to buy us and too expensive to replace us.

If I were you, I'd sweat the sub commander uniforms worrying that SWA will scoop us up and your West Coast feed will disappear. If you really want to grab Alaska, better do it quick because the bidding war will be UGLY for YOUR bottom line.

Or you could just quit worrying about the left seats you're not holding and concentrate on the flying Mama Delta wants you to do. After all, if you want to be a Captain so bad, you could always bid JFK.
Moby Dick is offline  
Old 03-06-2013, 03:44 PM
  #124850  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Does this includes Capt. Dickson's latest podcast info? I forgot when he stated the DC9 would be gone, but Network wanted it later and Flight Operations wanted it sooner for just the reasons you mentioned. Both sides made their case and Flight Ops won the earlier retirement date. Capt. Dickson said this would be good for pilots, as would reduce the need for displacements to the 717 since the new flying could be "funded" with DC9 crews.

Note (change in terms): We were pilots, then we were staff, now we are funds.
I'll lay money on DC9A 80kts Clamp if he bids it. or voluntary displacement to it.
scambo1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices