Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,420
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You are correct, and I stand corrected.
![Herkflyr is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Permanently scarred
Posts: 1,707
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If that were the case the TA should have had ALV+15 apply only to the categories needed. So IF DALPA said as much, the company pushed back and said NO--every category gets ALV+15. IF DALPA did not counter, well, I wouldn't be surprised. Disappointed, but not surprised. Bottom line--they got it for domestic narrowbody flying as well because they wanted it, and they plan to use it.
![GunshipGuy is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,420
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's funny because on 3 different occasions in the past 2 years I have either hit ALV or come within 2 hrs of it. On 2 other occasions I've probably come within 3-5 hrs of ALV and the result was more less the same. This was all in a domestic category. So I don't buy this idea that reserves in those categories don't fly enough to see a degradation of QOL. I understand that the summers means working more but now that we've moved the summer months to 30 day periods now we're talking min days off. When you're working every on call day the added extra 2 days that you could look forward to were valuable.
The idea that you have to be ALV+15 to be screwed is flawed. Not being full is bad enough but there will a lot of ALV+5 and ALV+10 going on which is bad enough. Taking OPTIONS away from pilots is never a good thing. Furthermore if ALV+15 is a rule to cover 12-14 day trips, why not make AlV+15 a intl category only reserve rule?
The idea that you have to be ALV+15 to be screwed is flawed. Not being full is bad enough but there will a lot of ALV+5 and ALV+10 going on which is bad enough. Taking OPTIONS away from pilots is never a good thing. Furthermore if ALV+15 is a rule to cover 12-14 day trips, why not make AlV+15 a intl category only reserve rule?
Look, few guys, even ones like me who voted for this last agreement, are not admitting that these rules are not concessionary. I just think that they will not be as bad as some here think, and it was overall part of a tradeoff that resulted in my voting for the contract.
Also, while it may be onerous in the short term, especially this summer coming up, with the new FT/DT rules, a lot of this will be mitigated.
I could be wrong, and two autumns from now I might be stating "what were the negotiators thinking, and what was I thinking voting for this system?"
I would just say, give the new system a summer and fall to be implemented before claiming anything. And, as with anything needing contractual improvement, contact your reps frequently and fervently, to keep them honest and accountable to you as the line pilot, so that they can beat up the negotiating committee to be the same.
Many improvements (especially from the Scheduling Optimization Team 2) came about this way--as I bid for CQ, instead of letting the company computer decide for me, as I slid my vacation in January 19 days earlier in the month, as ATL commuters now get hotel rooms for CQ, etc etc.
Last edited by Herkflyr; 02-27-2013 at 05:47 AM.
![Herkflyr is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm going to jump in on this one.
DALPA is very aware of what the deficit is, what it will take to be in compliance at the end of the measurement period, and what it will take to be in compliance a year later. (End of the Cure period)
The measurement period is three years with Air France/KLM/AZ. The contract does not have any corrective mechanisms in place before the end of the measurement period, and then there is a 12 month cure period after that. That means that even if it does not look like DAL will be in compliance there is no trigger to claim they are in violation of the contract until the end of the cure period. Good or bad, what we see today is a measurement and is not contractually significant. Until there is a true violation of the PWA, any action taken will be dismissed because no violation as yet to occur.
DALPA measures this constantly and is aware of the EASK balance.
*Of note labor laws in France just recently changed and the Q1 2013 pull down by Air France is quite significant. Apparently these changes to French Labor law allow AF more flexibility in their block plan. Again, your union is watching the EASK balance.
DALPA is very aware of what the deficit is, what it will take to be in compliance at the end of the measurement period, and what it will take to be in compliance a year later. (End of the Cure period)
The measurement period is three years with Air France/KLM/AZ. The contract does not have any corrective mechanisms in place before the end of the measurement period, and then there is a 12 month cure period after that. That means that even if it does not look like DAL will be in compliance there is no trigger to claim they are in violation of the contract until the end of the cure period. Good or bad, what we see today is a measurement and is not contractually significant. Until there is a true violation of the PWA, any action taken will be dismissed because no violation as yet to occur.
DALPA measures this constantly and is aware of the EASK balance.
*Of note labor laws in France just recently changed and the Q1 2013 pull down by Air France is quite significant. Apparently these changes to French Labor law allow AF more flexibility in their block plan. Again, your union is watching the EASK balance.
![scambo1 is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 581
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Contrary to many recent posts, I see most reserves are sitting at home getting paid to grow a beard. Most widebody reserves aren't getting close to half the ALV, much less to the ALV. "Yeah but wait till summer" you say. Well, hmmm..., isn't that how things always are in this industry? Summertime flying picks up and pilots fly more? Or did I miss something?
The entire ALV+15, while I admit concessionary, isn't going to be nearly as onerous as you think, due to those pesky things called FARs. There is no way a domestic pilot is going to be flying 95 hours a month except as a statistical outlier--it certainly won't be the norm. Further, the 7 short call thing only takes effect when the new FT/DT rules are in effect, which limits any short call (domestic or international) to 14 hours.
The true reason for ALV+15 was the long 12-14 day trips flying to the Pacific that in the summertime frequently are worth 85+ hours.
Under the old contract if a pilot sicked out of one of those, not one reserve in the entire airline would be eligible to be assigned it, even if he had 15 or more continuous on call days, because you could not be assigned a trip that would cause you to exceed the ALV.
In prior eras, DAL (south) rarely had such trips, but the NWA side always did.
I do not believe it is unreasonable for the company to expect a reserve with zero hours to be assigned a published trip completely over his on call days. Any reserve in a WB category whose line started out with 18 straight on call days (which is common in such categories) should be eligible for such. Apparently the thinking on this forum disagrees.
As for "reserves are going to be slaughtered." I disagree. Reserves flying a bunch over summer?...yes, but isn't that what the airline industry is all about? At least now they have the calendar day average going for them, which applies to reserves and deadhead-only duty periods. While not perfect, now a two-day trip is always worth at least 9 hours to a reserve, where it might have only been worth four before!
The entire ALV+15, while I admit concessionary, isn't going to be nearly as onerous as you think, due to those pesky things called FARs. There is no way a domestic pilot is going to be flying 95 hours a month except as a statistical outlier--it certainly won't be the norm. Further, the 7 short call thing only takes effect when the new FT/DT rules are in effect, which limits any short call (domestic or international) to 14 hours.
The true reason for ALV+15 was the long 12-14 day trips flying to the Pacific that in the summertime frequently are worth 85+ hours.
Under the old contract if a pilot sicked out of one of those, not one reserve in the entire airline would be eligible to be assigned it, even if he had 15 or more continuous on call days, because you could not be assigned a trip that would cause you to exceed the ALV.
In prior eras, DAL (south) rarely had such trips, but the NWA side always did.
I do not believe it is unreasonable for the company to expect a reserve with zero hours to be assigned a published trip completely over his on call days. Any reserve in a WB category whose line started out with 18 straight on call days (which is common in such categories) should be eligible for such. Apparently the thinking on this forum disagrees.
As for "reserves are going to be slaughtered." I disagree. Reserves flying a bunch over summer?...yes, but isn't that what the airline industry is all about? At least now they have the calendar day average going for them, which applies to reserves and deadhead-only duty periods. While not perfect, now a two-day trip is always worth at least 9 hours to a reserve, where it might have only been worth four before!
You make an interesting point, but if the intent was reserve coverage for 15-day international trips, why wasn't the ALV+15 concession limited to international categories? I surmise because DAL thought it had a domestic benefit as well.
To me, anyway, the combination of ALV+15, a seventh short call day and the 30 day bid periods in the summer months all add up to potential "reserve h*ll".
I've been on reserve when the company is short staffed and it's not fun. You're literally flying a trip, on short call or on X-days. And with reserve pilots getting different credit for the same trip - they work a lot of days.
I'm fortunate in that I'm senior enough to hold a "decent" regular line. Since last fall I've been voluntarily bidding reserve most months. However there is no way I'll bid reserve in the summer.
I realize some categories may not be getting much usage from their reserve pilots but that's decidedly not the case in mine (SLC A-320A). Just looking at the availability list for today: Five pilots available. Two in RAW group two. Two in RAW group three. One in RAW group four (and he's the most senior pilot on reserve this month, IIRC). Of the total number of short calls that could be assigned so far to this group of pilots 68% have been used. Guys aren't growing beards on reserve here...
![Wasatch Phantom is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,420
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Herk,
You make an interesting point, but if the intent was reserve coverage for 15-day international trips, why wasn't the ALV+15 concession limited to international categories? I surmise because DAL thought it had a domestic benefit as well.
To me, anyway, the combination of ALV+15, a seventh short call day and the 30 day bid periods in the summer months all add up to potential "reserve h*ll".
I've been on reserve when the company is short staffed and it's not fun. You're literally flying a trip, on short call or on X-days. And with reserve pilots getting different credit for the same trip - they work a lot of days.
I'm fortunate in that I'm senior enough to hold a "decent" regular line. Since last fall I've been voluntarily bidding reserve most months. However there is no way I'll bid reserve in the summer.
I realize some categories may not be getting much usage from their reserve pilots but that's decidedly not the case in mine (SLC A-320A). Just looking at the availability list for today: Five pilots available. Two in RAW group two. Two in RAW group three. One in RAW group four (and he's the most senior pilot on reserve this month, IIRC). Of the total number of short calls that could be assigned so far to this group of pilots 68% have been used. Guys aren't growing beards on reserve here...
You make an interesting point, but if the intent was reserve coverage for 15-day international trips, why wasn't the ALV+15 concession limited to international categories? I surmise because DAL thought it had a domestic benefit as well.
To me, anyway, the combination of ALV+15, a seventh short call day and the 30 day bid periods in the summer months all add up to potential "reserve h*ll".
I've been on reserve when the company is short staffed and it's not fun. You're literally flying a trip, on short call or on X-days. And with reserve pilots getting different credit for the same trip - they work a lot of days.
I'm fortunate in that I'm senior enough to hold a "decent" regular line. Since last fall I've been voluntarily bidding reserve most months. However there is no way I'll bid reserve in the summer.
I realize some categories may not be getting much usage from their reserve pilots but that's decidedly not the case in mine (SLC A-320A). Just looking at the availability list for today: Five pilots available. Two in RAW group two. Two in RAW group three. One in RAW group four (and he's the most senior pilot on reserve this month, IIRC). Of the total number of short calls that could be assigned so far to this group of pilots 68% have been used. Guys aren't growing beards on reserve here...
I will withhold further opinions until after this fall, and perhaps I will come back and say "what a bad deal we mistakenly agreed to."
![Herkflyr is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 581
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm going to go out on a limb and say our pal sailing isn't going to pick this opportunity to give the usual "but we have the best and brightest" (lawyers, negotiators, analysts, consultant, etc) on staff at ALPA National... because this is direct evidence of (yet another) poor job on their part.
![Wasatch Phantom is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Decoupled
Posts: 922
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That's just it. There was never a provision that didn't allow a pilot to go above the ALV if they chose to. Now we force them to.
It's funny because on 3 different occasions in the past 2 years I have either hit ALV or come within 2 hrs of it. On 2 other occasions I've probably come within 3-5 hrs of ALV and the result was more less the same. This was all in a domestic category. So I don't buy this idea that reserves in those categories don't fly enough to see a degradation of QOL. I understand that the summers means working more but now that we've moved the summer months to 30 day periods now we're talking min days off. When you're working every on call day the added extra 2 days that you could look forward to were valuable.
The idea that you have to be ALV+15 to be screwed is flawed. Not being full is bad enough but there will a lot of ALV+5 and ALV+10 going on which is bad enough. Taking OPTIONS away from pilots is never a good thing. Furthermore if ALV+15 is a rule to cover 12-14 day trips, why not make AlV+15 a intl category only reserve rule?
It's funny because on 3 different occasions in the past 2 years I have either hit ALV or come within 2 hrs of it. On 2 other occasions I've probably come within 3-5 hrs of ALV and the result was more less the same. This was all in a domestic category. So I don't buy this idea that reserves in those categories don't fly enough to see a degradation of QOL. I understand that the summers means working more but now that we've moved the summer months to 30 day periods now we're talking min days off. When you're working every on call day the added extra 2 days that you could look forward to were valuable.
The idea that you have to be ALV+15 to be screwed is flawed. Not being full is bad enough but there will a lot of ALV+5 and ALV+10 going on which is bad enough. Taking OPTIONS away from pilots is never a good thing. Furthermore if ALV+15 is a rule to cover 12-14 day trips, why not make AlV+15 a intl category only reserve rule?
It should have been split into two operations.
The Company won in both instances. We solved their international problem with 7+ day trips. We gave them the ability to really abuse the domestic reserve.
![orvil is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 841
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, the 747 rumor has had a very quiet death.
![firstmob is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,014
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"If the Company’s EASK capacity share is out of compliance with its minimum 11 EASK allocation for the three-year measurement period ending March 31, 2014, then the Company will return its EASK capacity share to compliance with its minimum EASK allocation for the three year measurement period ending March 31, 2015."
According to D-ALPA's published work; we are at a 1.4% deficit which needs to be cured by March 2014. That is the equivalent of 9 daily flights to the Euro zone daily, IF IF IF nothing changes on the AF/KLM/AZ side.
But, Air France and Alitalia turned in some ugly numbers and Alitalia's growth spurt would appear to have run its course. The other way to bring this into balance is a decrease by our European partners. Just as ACL65 alluded to, an European pull down is likely with some marginal growth by Delta may bring this into balance.
(thanks to the Delta MEC for publishing it's work from our most recent MEC meeting)
![Bucking Bar is offline](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post